Learning and Adapting for Outcomes through the Management Action Record 2023 - Report to the Board from the Committee on Development Effectiveness

Jul 19, 2026

Report of the World Bank Group Committee on Development Effectiveness detailing how the Management Action Record (MAR) 2023 and the IEG validation address implementation of IEG recommendations. The committee reviews management progress on strengthening evidence quality and the assessment framework linked to results chains for intended outcomes. It notes differences between IEG and management assessments in selected recommendations, emphasizes MAR’s role in the WBG Evolution Roadmap, and discusses actions to improve prioritization, retirement, and effective implementation via appointed champions, including continued reporting for specified evaluations.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages1

Reading Time3 min

Meeting overview

Review of MAR and IEG validation

Assessment framework and evidence quality

Progress, disagreements, and prioritization of recommendations

Retirement decisions and continued tracking

Implementation support through champions

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Learning and Adapting for Outcomes through the Management Action Record 2023: A World Bank Group Management Report on Implementation ofIEG Recommendations and IEG Validation of the Management Action Record 2023 Report to the Board from the Committee on Development Effectiveness 􀀍 Meeting of September 20, 2023 The Committee on Development Effectiveness met to consider the Report Learning and Adapting for Outcomes through the Management Action Record 2023: A World Bank Group Management Report on Implementation of IEG Recommendations (CODE2023-0042/1), together with the IEG Validation of the Management Action Record 2023 (CODE2023-0041) . The Committee welcomed the WBG Management Action Record (MAR) Report and IEG’s Validation Report and commended IEG and WBG Management for their collaborative work in enhancing the quality of the MAR and strengthening the process. Members noted Management’s progress on efforts towards improving the quality of evidence in the MAR report and the assessment framework used to assess progress towards intended outcomes. They were pleased to note that Management and IEG applied the same categories to assess progress on the recommendations for the MAR through application of a resultschain aligned with these categories for each recommendation. While they were encouraged by some progress in the implementation of many of IEG’s recommendations, however in 13 of the 59 recommendations from the 22 evaluations considered, IEG and Management assessed progress differently (noting that IEG provided higher assessment levels than Management had self-assessed in four of these 13 areas of assessment differences) . Members underscored the importance of the MAR in support of the WBG Evolution Roadmap. They noted the need to improve implementation ofIEG’s recommendations to achieve a change of direction and as such, agreed with IEGs three recommendations proposed to further strengthen the MAR process and ensure achievement of expected outcomes. Noting the disagreement between World Bank Management and IEG in retiring some recommendations coupled with the fact that four out of the five evaluations due for automatic retirement have not achieved their expected outcomes, some members requested a clearer process of prioritizing recommendations and retiring recommendations. They acknowledged the growing buildup of unmet IEG recommendations and Management’s concern about the growth of recommendations and desire to have a manageable set of prioritized recommendations for timely implementation, and expressed support for Management’s plan to appoint “champions”, starting in FY24, to ensure effective and efficient implementation of IEG recommendations. Members encouraged WBG Management and IEG to further improve the quality of evidence and outcomes. The Committee took note of Management’s proposal to retire thirteen recommendations, excluding the retirement of recommendation 3 on the urban resilience evaluation as initially proposed. They welcomed Management’s agreement with IEG to continue reporting on the recommendation on urban resilience evaluation for the upcoming fourth year of review. They also appreciated Management’s commitment to track, for an additional year (when otherwise due for auto-retirement), the recommendations on Regional Integration (final recommendation – which Management considered useful to show continued progress even though Management and IEG had both agreed that the recommendation had fully met the ‘change of direction’ assessment level) and Citizen Engagement (with recommendation 3 continuing, with the rest being retired) . 􀀍 This report is not an approved record.

FAQs

What is the purpose of the Committee on Development Effectiveness meeting on September 20, 2023?

To consider the MAR 2023 report on implementation of IEG recommendations together with IEG’s validation of the MAR 2023, and to review progress and next steps for strengthening outcomes.

How does the committee describe the assessment approach for MAR recommendations?

It notes that both WBG Management and IEG applied the same categories to assess progress, using a results chain aligned with those categories for each recommendation.

What issues did committee members raise regarding assessment differences and recommendation retirement?

Members highlighted that in 13 of 59 recommendations considered, IEG and Management assessed progress differently, with IEG assigning higher levels in four cases. They also requested a clearer process for prioritizing recommendations and retiring them.

Jul 19, 2026

Upload by Emma Wilson