Quality Plan - WP7 (Deliverable 7.1) - Quality and Risk Management

Sep 12, 2026

Upload by Himbo

Quality Plan for WP7 (Deliverable 7.1) defines how the Enricher – Hubs project monitors and achieves quality, structure, processes, and results. University of Genova leads the design and validation of the plan using a plan-do-check-act framework, while partners provide feedback and reporting inputs. The document specifies multi-layered internal quality control roles, an external auditor for quality monitoring, and a three-fold risk management approach covering early identification, likelihood/impact assessment, mitigation, and continuous follow-up. It also sets indicators for implementation and quality assurance milestones.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryPresentations

FormatPDF

Pages27

Reading Time9 min

AccessFree to download

Quality Plan Introduction

Risk management

Indicators

Activity 0-Monitoring and Evaluation

Activity 1-Quality

Activity 2-Quality

Activity 3-Quality

Activity 4-Monitoring and Evaluation

External evaluator

Activities and Timetable

External evaluator

INTERMEDIATE AND FINAL REPORTS

Annex 1: Quality Board composition

Annex 2: Evaluation short report

Annex 3: Online management meeting template

Annex 4: Face-to-face management meeting template

Quality Plan WP7 (Deliverable 7.1) | Work Package: | WP7 | | --- | --- | | Lead Beneficiary: | University of Genova-UNIGE | | Other participating Beneficiaries: | HHUAS, CU, ATSU, TeSau, USPEE, MSU, KDU, MCI | | Due date: | M3 | | Submission Date: | 03.2024 | | Deliverable Type: | Document | | Dissemination Level: | Public | Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or EACEA. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. INDEX INDEX 2 Quality Plan Introduction 3 Risk management 4 Quality activities and processes 5 External evaluator 6 Activities and Timetable 7 Activity 0-Monitoring and Evaluation 8 QUALITY BOARD SETTING UP 8 Activity 1-Quality 9 INDICATORS SETTING UP 9 Activity 2-Quality 10 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 10 Activity 3-Quality 11 RESULT EVALUATION AND FEEDBACK 11 Activity 4-Monitoring and Evaluation 13 INTERMEDIATE AND FINAL REPORTS 13 Indicators 14 Annex 1: Quality Board composition 18 Annex 2: Evaluation short report 19 Annex 3: Online management meeting template 23 Annex 4: Face-to-face management meeting template 24 Quality Plan Introduction In the frame of the project ENRICHER – Hubs, Designing Green Tourism Concepts Through Learning, the aim of the WP7 Quality and Risk Management is to ensure that the quality, structure, processes, and results of the project are monitored and achieved. University of Genova ( UniGe) is responsible for the design of the quality plan, for monitoring, evaluation and learning, which has been validated by the partners at the first team meeting. UniGe will check the activities and outputs of the project using the plan-do-check-act model as a framework. All partners are supporting in this process through feedback, development inputs occurring in their countries, reporting systems etc. to ensure the project is progressing in the right direction. To guarantee optimal quality management of the output from the actions, responsibilities are clearly defined with multi-layered control. The following mechanisms are used to ensure the monitoring and evaluation of the project, its deliverables and outcomes: - Each Work Package Leader (WPL) is responsible of the quality of its activities and deliverables. - An internal review process ensures that each deliverable is systematically validated by other consortium partners. WPLs will overview their related tasks and deliverables. - The Project Coordinator ( PC) will make a final check of the quality of the deliverables. - Where necessary, the WPL and PC can request further work from partners on a deliverable, to ensure that it complies with the project’s contractual requirements. - Internal quality control is distributed and organised in several stages, the formal responsibility for the quality of deliverables resides within the PMB. - An external auditor is sub-contracted to monitor the quality of the project (WP7) . Risk management In addition to the quality management of the project, there are risks associated with any type of project running over several years. The approach to risk management is three-fold: - First, risk monitoring and identification: the consortium will seek to identify potential issues early before they cause an actual problem, by encouraging an open working atmosphere and regular meetings. - Second, the project will use the estimation of likelihood and impact against the key risks. It will detail the risk with their date, classification and impact assessment (features, cost, time), detailing effects of each risk element using flow charts. The quantification of project risks will be performed considering the most likely outcome scenario for all identified risks. - Third, risk management: the consortium will deal with any potential or actual issues in a rapid and flexible manner. All the partn

FAQs

What is the purpose of WP7 Quality and Risk Management?

WP7 aims to ensure the project’s quality, structure, processes, and results are monitored and achieved throughout implementation.

Who is responsible for designing and validating the quality plan?

University of Genova (UniGe) is responsible for designing the quality plan and for monitoring, evaluation, and learning, validated by partners at the first team meeting.

How does the consortium manage risks in WP7?

Risk management follows three steps: early risk monitoring and identification, estimating likelihood and impact, and responding in a rapid and flexible way with mitigation actions coordinated through the PC and relevant work package leadership.

Sep 12, 2026

Upload by Himbo