Question 1

What is the main purpose of comparing TGR and MCGR in this study?

Accepted Answer

To evaluate radiographic outcomes at graduation, along with unplanned returns to the operating room (UPROR) and complication profiles for traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods.

Question 2

How were the study participants selected and what exclusions were applied?

Accepted Answer

Patients from the PSSG database who underwent either TGR or MCGR with spine-based proximal anchors were included and followed to graduation; crossover or hybrid procedures were excluded.

Question 3

What differences in outcomes did the study report between TGR and MCGR groups?

Accepted Answer

Both groups showed radiological improvement after implantation, but kyphosis normalization and further curve reduction occurred alongside differences in mechanical complications; the MCGR group had fewer complications and a lower overall risk of UPROR.