SECTION 21 - LEGAL STAFF TRACK - Intake Fundamentals for an Effective and Efficient Process

Oct 14, 2026

Upload by dbqoiu

SECTION 21 LEGAL STAFF TRACK outlines how law-firm intake calls should be structured to create a strong first impression and gather the information needed to evaluate potential cases. It emphasizes respectful, nonjudgmental communication, active listening, and managing call control to balance efficiency with client comfort. The guidance highlights common pitfalls, such as focusing on “what happened” instead of the injury and condition, and proposes using prompts to separate case facts from resulting harm.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryLetters

FormatPDF

Pages114

Reading Time40 min

AccessFree to download

SECTION 21 - LEGAL STAFF TRACK

The Fundamentals of Intakes: Toward an Effective and Efficient Process

I. Introductions to the Firm

II. Case Assessment Issues

A. Description of Injury and Condition

| | | --- | | | | SECTION 21
LEGAL STAFF TRACK | THE FUNDAMENTALS OF INTAKES: TOWARD AN EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT PROCESS By James West The importance of the intake process should not be underestimated. It not only provides information about why a caller is reaching out to the firm, but it also does much more. A potential client’s call is usually that person’s first interaction with the firm, and that first impression is vital to the prospective relationship and reputation of the firm. The call is also necessary for obtaining information to the firm to assess the potential case and ultimately decide whether that potential case should be accepted or rejected. For law firms representing plaintiffs, intake calls often involve individuals who have been harmed, threatened, offended, or who are otherwise devastated because of what happened to them or to one of their loved ones. Frequently, questions arise during the intake process ranging from callers seeking advice to callers wanting to tell a complete story and get off their chests what happened to them or to someone they care about. It is imperative to find a process that works to manage these calls, as well as to understand the underlying reasons as to why a lot of the information is needed and obtained. Proper training, including working with others who have experience in handling these intake processes, is often useful and necessary to a firm having an intake process that is both efficient and reliable. I. Introductions to the Firm It is important to bear in mind that when a potential client calls the firm about their potential case, that one call often forms a lasting first impression on that caller. The reputation of the firm is at stake during the course of that call, a point that should not be taken lightly. For firms that represent plaintiffs, the callers are often individuals rather than a representative of companies, and they have stories to tell and are looking for someone simply to help them. As such, it is important to be polite, sympathetic, and understanding as to why they are calling. The person doing the intake should listen to the caller carefully and to be responsive to them without passing judgment and without giving advice. The intake process is challenging for any firm because it is time consuming and often leads to a number of cases being rejected. It is easy to see this as a process where much of the time spent on the phone maybe futile, or at least may seem futile at the time, depending on how many cases and what types of cases the firm accepts or rejects. However, potential clients who call for the first time should never get a sense that their case is not important or that what they have to say is not valuable. A lot of the callers have no experience working with attorneys, or at least with law firms handling litigation cases on their behalf, so this is a world that is completely unfamiliar when they call. Bearing those things in mind will go a long way to making the intake process one in which the potential client is comfortable and that builds confidence in that person and the firm. The potential client should get a sense that the person doing the intake knows what he or she is doing, cares about them, and that the information that is taken will be handled appropriately. The intake process should also be one in which the person doing the intake stays in control of the call both to manage the length of the call and to give the potential client confidence that the firm knows what information is needed. II. Case Assessment Issues A. Description of Injury and Condition In my experience working in the intake process, both doing the intakes myself and as an attorney who reviews the intakes that are done, I have found that there is an overwhelming tendency to focus on the facts of what happened rather than the injury that the client ultimately suffered. One of the most intuitive things to do when a potential client calls in is to a

FAQs

Why is the intake process considered crucial for law firms?

It creates the first impression with the prospective client and supplies key information to assess the potential case and decide acceptance or rejection.

What should the intake person do during introductions for plaintiff-side matters?

Listen carefully, respond without judgment, remain polite and sympathetic, and avoid giving advice while supporting the caller’s need to share their story.

What is a common mistake in case assessment during intake calls?

Overemphasizing “what happened” rather than clearly identifying the injury and the client’s current condition, which makes the information harder to evaluate.

Oct 14, 2026

Upload by dbqoiu