Panel Review 2021 -- Session 1 (IDAL, PBSI, ERI, & SEDS-AG)

Sep 2, 2026

This document outlines the procedures and deadlines for Panel Review 2021 – Session 1, specifically for the IDAL, PBSI, ERI, & SEDS-AG panels. It emphasizes the importance of consulting with session Chairs to develop panel schedules, including dates and times for panel review and the Panel Manager (PM) meeting. The document details that initial draft summary reports are due to the PM by specific dates in July, with the first draft due Wednesday, July 7th, followed by subsequent drafts on Thursday, July 15th, Monday, July 26th, and Wednesday, August 4th. It also provides a table for tracking panel review schedules, including meeting order, application number, reviewer comments due date, panel discussion times, and the panel summary report submission deadline. Additionally, the document provides guidelines for writing effective review comments, distinguishing between good and bad practices. Good comments are described as complete, grammatically correct sentences that refer to specific application page numbers, suggest improvements, reference elements with examples and analysis, align scores with comments, refer to the application (not the applicant), and are objective. Conversely, bad comments include merely listing application contents, being grammatically incorrect, repeating weaknesses/strengths across sub-criteria, having misaligned scores, referring to the applicant instead of the application, and being overly brief or lacking analysis.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryForms

FormatPDF

Pages14

Reading Time5 min

AccessFree to download

Panel Review 2021 -- Session 1

Guidelines for Panel Review Comments

Panel Review Schedule

FAQs

What are the key deadlines for submitting draft summary reports for Panel Review 2021 - Session 1?

The initial draft summary reports are due to the Panel Manager (PM) on specific dates in July: Draft 1 on Wednesday, July 7th; Draft 2 on Thursday, July 15th; Draft 3 on Monday, July 26th; and Draft 4 on Wednesday, August 4th. Exact dates for further drafts are not specified.

What are the characteristics of a "good" review comment, according to the document?

Good review comments should be complete, grammatically correct sentences that refer to specific application page numbers, suggest potential improvements, include examples and analysis, align scores with the comments, refer to the application itself, and be objective.

What constitutes a "bad" review comment?

Bad review comments are characterized by simply listing application contents, being grammatically incorrect or lacking proper punctuation, repeating comments across multiple sub-criteria, having scores that conflict with other comments, referring to the applicant rather than the application, and being too brief or lacking analysis.

Sep 2, 2026

Upload by Riley West