Narrative review template: journal of educational evaluation for health professions

Sep 1, 2026

Manuscript template for an editor-commissioned narrative review submitted to the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. It specifies title formatting and author/affiliation details including corresponding author contact information, ORCID requirements, and submission constraints for abstract, main text, references, tables, and figures. The template merges purpose, methods, results, and conclusion into a single abstract section, requires MeSH terms via MeSH on Demand for keywords, and outlines introduction background, objectives, and a conclusion tied to the stated hypotheses, questions, usefulness, contributions, conflicts of interest, funding, and data availability sections.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryPresentations

FormatDOCX

Pages6

Reading Time2 min

AccessFree to download

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Background

Objectives

Conclusion

ORCID and author information

Authors’ contributions

Conflict of interest

Funding and data availability

Funding

Data availability

Acknowledgments

[Review] (Publication types are listed in Table 1, available at HYPERLINK "https://www.jeehp.org/authors/authors.php" https://www.jeehp.org/authors/authors.php. [It is the template for a narrative review that is commissioned by the editor. The template for the publication type of the systematic review-metaanalysis is different]. Title Write the title in lowercase characters except for the first word’s first character and any proper nouns, which should be capitalized. The study design information (narrative or systematic review) should be added after a colon. A Ra Cho1, Sun Huh2* 1Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea; 2Department of Parasitology and Institute of Medical Education, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea * Corresponding author: Sun Huh Department of Parasitology and Institute of Medical Education, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea Tel: +82.33.248.2652 e-mail: HYPERLINK "mailto:xxxxx@jeehp.org" xxxxx@jeehp.org (It is strongly recommended to use the author’s institutional e-mail rather than an e-mail address from a commercial company. An e-mail address from a commercial company can be added as secondary e-mail with a semicolon to separate the e-mail addresses.) Word count of abstract: 250 (maximum) Word count of main text: 5,000 (maximum) Number of references: 50 (maximum) Number of tables and figures: 10 (maximum) - The word count limits are negotiable with the editor. (The recommended word count, number of references, tables, and figures for manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions according to publication type are presented in Table 1, available at https://www.jeehp.org/authors/authors.php. Submissions beyond the suggested limitations should be negotiated with the editorial board.) Abstract Sections of purpose, methods, results, and conclusion are merged into one. Keywords: Cohort studies; Educational measurement; Program evaluation; Republic of Korea; Research design (It is mandatory to use MeSH terms through MeSH on Demand, available at: HYPERLINK "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MeSHonDemand.html)" https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MeSHonDemand.html). The use of other terms is negotiable with the editorial board. Introduction Background Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being reported: what is known, what is unknown and important to know; what is the specific topic addressed in the manuscript; and why addressing that particular topic is important Objectives: Specific objectives, including any pre-specified hypotheses or research questions, should be described in one paragraph. (Text) If the main text should be presented within a total word count of 5,500, attach the full data as a supplement. Conlusion Deduce the conclusion from the main text. If there were research hypotheses or questions in the introduction section, they should be answered. It is meaningful to mention the usefulness of the content in educational evaluations to promote medical or health education. ORCID An ORCID number is essential for all authors. Full information should be added to the authors’ ORCID. Without full information, the manuscript will not be considered for review. No chance for resubmission will be provided to authors. A Ra Cho: HYPERLINK "http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0458-5256" http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0458-5256 Sun Huh: HYPERLINK "http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8559-8640" http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8559-8640 Authors’ contributions Please describe all of the following: Conceptualization: SH (ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims.) Data curation: ARC (management activities to annotate [produce metadata], scrub data, and maintain research data including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself for initial use and later re-use.) Methodology/formal analysis/validation: ARC,

FAQs

What sections should be included in the narrative review abstract?

Purpose, methods, results, and conclusion are merged into one abstract section.

How should keywords be selected for the submission?

Keywords should use MeSH terms through MeSH on Demand; other terms are negotiable with the editorial board.

What are the main limits for the manuscript in this template?

The template sets limits for abstract word count (250 max), main text word count (5,000 max), references (50 max), and numbers of tables/figures (10 max), with possible negotiation with the editor.

What must be provided for ORCID and author contributions?

Full ORCID information is required for all authors. Authors’ contributions should describe roles using items such as conceptualization, data curation, methodology/formal analysis/validation, project administration, and writing.

Sep 1, 2026

Upload by Emma Mercer