FAB Performance Plan - Second Reference Period (2015-2019) - Signatories

Sep 22, 2026

Upload by Levi

FAB Performance Plan document detailing the structure and purpose for the NEFAB FAB, including versioning and key dates. It defines mapping between the FAB performance plan template and Annex II of the Performance Regulation, and lists signatories. The content provides an introduction, macroeconomic scenario assumptions, stakeholder consultation outcomes, actions at FAB and guiding principles level, airport lists for RP2, investment and local performance targets, incentive schemes, military dimension considerations, sensitivity analysis, and implementation guidance with annexes for consultation, documentation, reporting tables, investment plans, and additional material.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryPresentations

FormatPDF

Pages95

Reading Time33 min

AccessFree to download

STRUCTURE AND PURPOSE

MAPPING BETWEEN THE TEMPLATE FOR THE FAB PERFORMANCE PLAN AND ANNEX II OF THE PERFORMANCE REGULATION

SIGNATORIES

1 INTRODUCTION

2 INVESTMENT

3 PERFORMANCE TARGETS AT LOCAL LEVEL

4 INCENTIVE SCHEMES

5 MILITARY DIMENSION OF THE PLAN

6 ANALYSIS OF SENSITIVITY AND COMPARISON WITH THE PREVIOUS PERFORMANCE PLAN

7 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PERFORMANCE PLAN

8 ANNEXES

| | | --- | |
FAB Performance Plan
NEFAB | | Second Reference Period (2015-2019)
1 | 2 Signatories | Performance plan details | | | --- | --- | | FAB Name | NEFAB | | Version number | 0.93 | | Date of issue | 03.03.2014 | | Date of adoption | xx.xx.2014 | | Member State | Name, title and signature of representative | | --- | --- | | Estonia | | | Finland | | | Latvia | | | Norway | | | Additional comments | | | --- | --- | 4 Table of Content STRUCTURE AND PURPOSE MAPPING BETWEEN THE TEMPLATE FOR THE FAB PERFORMANCE PLAN AND ANNEX II OF THE PERFORMANCE REGULATION SIGNATORIES 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 THE SITUATION 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE MACROECONOMIC SCENARIO INCLUDING OVERALL ASSUMPTIONS 1.3 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 1.4 ACTIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE NETWORK STRATEGY PLAN AT FAB LEVEL AND OTHER GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1.5 LIST OF AIRPORTS FOR RP2 2 INVESTMENT 3 PERFORMANCE TARGETS AT LOCAL LEVEL 3.1 KEY PERFORMANCE AREAS 3.1.(a) Safety 3.1. (a) . (i) Safety KPI \#1: Level of Effectiveness of Safety Management 3.1. (a) . (ii) Safety KPI \#2: Application of the severity classification based on the Risk Analysis Tool (RAT) methodology 3.1. (a) . (iii) Safety KPI \#3: Just Culture 3.1. (a) . (iv) Optional section-Additional Safety KPI(s) 3.1.(b) Environment 3.1. (b) . (i) Description of the process to improve route design 3.1. (b) . (ii) Environment KPI \#1: Horizontal en route flight efficiency (KEA) 3.1. (b) . (iii) Optional section-Additional Environment KPI(s) 3.1.(c) Capacity 3.1. (c) . (i) Capacity KPI \#1: En route ATFM delay per flight 3.1. (c) . (ii) Capacity KPI \#2: Terminal and airport ANS ATFM arrival delay per flight 3.1. (c) . (iii) Capacity plans 3.1.(c) . (iv) Optional section-Additional Capacity KPI(s) 3.1.(d) Cost-efficiency 3.1. (d) . (1) Cost efficiency KPI \#1: Determined unit cost (DUC) for en route ANS 3.1. (d) . (2) Cost efficiency KPI \#1: Determined unit cost (DUC) for en route ANS aggregated at FABlevel 3.1. (d) . (3) Cost efficiency KPI \#2: Determined unit cost (DUC) for terminal ANS 3.1. (d) . (4) Optional section-Additional Cost-Efficiency KPI(s) 3.2 CONSISTENCY WITH UNION-WIDE TARGETS 3.3 INTERDEPENDENCIES AND TRADE-OFFS 3.4 CONTRIBUTION OF EACH ANSP 4 INCENTIVE SCHEMES 4.1 ENVIRONMENT 4.1 CAPACITY 4.1 COST-EFFICIENCY 5 MILITARY DIMENSION OF THE PLAN ADDITIONAL (KEY) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (AND TARGETS) 6 ANALYSIS OF SENSITIVITY AND COMPARISON WITH THE PREVIOUS PERFORMANCE PLAN 6.1 ANALYSIS OF SENSITIVITY 6.2 COMPARISON WITH RP1 7 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PERFORMANCE PLAN 8 ANNEXES ANNEX A. PUBLIC CONSULTATION MATERIAL ANNEX B. RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION IN LINE WITH THE NSP ANNEX C. REPORTING TABLES ANNEX D. ANSPS INVESTMENT PLANS ANNEX E. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL Mapping between the template for the FAB performance plan and Annex II of the performance Regulation IMPORTANT NOTE FOR SECTION 3.1.(d)– Cost-efficiency: The data and justifications for the cost-efficiency targets at local level are split into two distinct parts of the performance plan, aiming at optimising workload and avoiding duplication of reporting. They comprise: 1. In the body of the performance plan document, the information to be presented at charging zone level (some of the data requested being pre-filled by the PRB): • The targets with a description of the contribution to, and consistency with, the EU-wide target and/or their contribution to the performance of the European ATM network;: • The entries and justification requiring data from external sources i.e. o The traffic forecast used and, if applicable, their justification against STATFOR o The inflation assumptions used and, if applicable, their justification against Eurostat/ IMF. • The local alert thresholds, if any, and their justification. • A presentation of the consolidation of the targets at FAB level. 2. In Annex C, the information needed at t

FAQs

What is the document’s purpose and how does it relate to the Performance Regulation?

It explains the structure and purpose of the FAB performance plan and provides a mapping between the template used and Annex II of the Performance Regulation.

Who are the signatories and where are they listed?

Signatories are listed under a dedicated section, with Member State entries intended to capture the representative’s name, title, and signature.

How is cost-efficiency information organized for local level targets?

Cost-efficiency targets are split into two parts: information presented in the body at charging zone level and complementary details in Annex C at entity level, including reporting-table data and justifications.

Sep 22, 2026

Upload by Levi