DSWD - SB - GF - 101 - Assessment Tool for the Accreditation of Center-Based Non-Residential Social Welfare and Development (SWD) Programs and Services

Sep 2, 2026

Upload by Ivy

Assessment tool form for accrediting center-based, non-residential Social Welfare and Development (SWD) programs and services. Captures identifying information for the center and other findings, including focus group discussion highlights comparing previous and current situations and documenting effects of delivered programs. Provides scoring tables across accreditation levels with point thresholds based on mandatory requirements and higher-set standards, followed by recommendations, including non-issuance actions and compliance timelines.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryForms

FormatDOCX

Pages48

Reading Time17 min

AccessFree to download

Identifying Information

Other Findings

Highlights of Focus Group Discussion

Table of Scores per Work Area

Scores for Each Level of Accreditation

Recommendations

A. Issuance of Accreditation Certificate

B. For Non-Issuance of Accreditation Certificate

Prepared by and Concurred by

Confidentiality and Data Privacy Note

ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF CENTER-BASED, NON-RESIDENTIAL SOCIAL WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT (SWD) PROGRAMS AND SERVICES Identifying Information: Name of Center: _______________________________________________________________________ Complete Address: _______________________________________________________________________ Center Head and Designation: _______________________________________________________________________ Telephone/Mobile Number/s: _______________________________________________________________________ Social Media Account (if there is any): _______________________________________________________________________ E-mail Address and Website: _______________________________________________________________________ Registration No: ________________________ Date Issued: _______________________ License No: _______________Date Issued: ___________ Expiration Date: ___________ OTHER FINDINGS: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Highlights of Focus Group Discussion (Include the effect of programs and services delivered by the agency for their development, cite the previous situation and compare with the current situation) _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Scores per Work Area: Scores for each Level of Accreditation: For Level 1 Accreditation– compliance to all of the Mandatory Requirements or an actual score of not less than 211 points For Level 2 Accreditation – compliance to all of the Mandatory Requirements and 80% in each Work Area of the Higher Set of Standards or an actual score of at least 313 points. For Level 3 Accreditation – compliance to all of the Mandatory Requirements and all or 90% of the indicators in the Higher Set of Standards or an actual score of 326 points. Recommendations: A. In view of the above findings, the ________ (Name of SWA) has satisfactorily met the standards for accreditation under Level _____. The issuance of Certificate of Accreditation is hereby recommended with validity period of ____ years for implementing center-based, non-residential programs and services to _________________________________________________________________. (Type of beneficiaries/clients) B. For Non- Issuance of Accreditation Certificate In view of the above findings, the issuance of accreditation certificate for _________________________________________________ is hereby held in abeyance. (Name of SWA) The

FAQs

What information is required in the Identifying Information section for the center?

It requires the center name, complete address, center head and designation, telephone/mobile numbers, social media account (if any), and e-mail address and website, plus registration and licensing details with issuance and expiration dates.

How are accreditation levels determined in the scoring section?

Level 1 requires compliance to all mandatory requirements or a score of not less than 211 points; Level 2 requires mandatory compliance plus 80% in each work area of the higher set of standards or at least 313 points; Level 3 requires mandatory compliance plus all or 90% of indicators in the higher set of standards or at least 326 points.

What happens under the recommendation for non-issuance of an accreditation certificate?

Issuance is held in abeyance for the specified SWA, and the agency must comply with an agreed action plan within six months; failure to comply after the grace period requires re-application as a new application with a new processing fee.

How is confidential information handled in this assessment tool?

Recipients must access and use the information strictly for DSWD’s mandate to register, license, and accredit SWD agencies. Processing, disclosure, copying, or distribution for any other purpose is prohibited, in line with the Data Privacy Act of 2012.

Sep 2, 2026

Upload by Ivy