Validation of the Higher Education Commission’s Quality Assurance Indicators Used for Self-Assessment Mechanism at Universities in Punjab Province

Oct 15, 2026

Uploaded by Fans

The study determines content validation of Higher Education Commission (HEC) quality assurance indicators used for universities’ self-assessment of academic programs in Punjab province. Forty faculty members from eight public sector universities served as expert respondents and rated indicators using a scale derived from HEC quality assurance guidance. Quantitative analysis employed percentage, mean, and standard deviation, while demographic effects were examined using ANOVA. Results confirmed the necessity of content validation and supported the indicators as a baseline for ongoing quality improvement through self-assessment.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages14

Reading Time35 min

AccessFree to download

Abstract

Introduction

Background on quality of education

Role of Higher Education Commission (HEC) and self-assessment

Review of Literature

Concepts of self-assessment

Definitions and purpose of indicators

Validation of the Higher Education Commission’s Quality Assurance Indicators Used for Self-Assessment Mechanism at Universities in Punjab Province Muhammad Ilyas Aslam * and Rafaqat Ali Akbar ** Abstract The objective of the study was to determine content validation of Higher Education Commission’s quality assurance indicators used for self-assessment of academic programs at universities. The recommendations of the study might be helpful for HEC, university authorities, teachers, students and policy-making agencies to assure quality of education at higher education level. Total forty faculty members from eight public sector universities from Punjab province randomly consulted as experts in this study and answered a rating scale. The rating scale derived from HEC quality assurance indicators, ‘Survey of Graduating Students’input on quality of education was administered. The results determined the content validity of quality assurance indicators with reformulations. Quantitative and qualitative data was analyzed focusing percentage, mean value, and standard deviation. Demographic effects were measured by calculating ANOVA statistics. It was noted that majority of the experts restated and given comments on existing indicators. The results confirmed that the procedure of content validation of indicators is indispensable for the development of self-assessment mechanism. These indicators provide base line for taking measures regarding quality of education through self-assessment mechanism. Quality of education can be enhanced through a quality assurance system and quality assurance system stays alive based on self-assessment process. Keywords: Quality of education, indicators (statements), validation, quality assurance, mechanism, self-assessment. * ** Ph.D Scholar IER, University of the Punjab, [Lahore. E-mail:](Lahore. E-mail: mianiub@gmail.com)[ ](Lahore. E-mail: mianiub@gmail.com)[mianiub@gmail.com](Lahore. E-mail: mianiub@gmail.com) Professor IER, University of the Punjab, Lahore Introduction Quality of education is an important area under discussion as focal point among the Higher Education Institutions all over the world. Internationally intensive efforts are being made to enhance the quality of education to face contemporary challenges. Quality of education is a fundamental aspect to get compatibility with growing global knowledge based societies (Ismail, 2010) . The academic quality describes how well the learning opportunities are available to students, and helps them to achieve their award or degree (Royse, Thyer, & Padgett, 2010) . The above assertion illustrates making sure suitable and effective teaching is a way towards best learning outcomes which are the fundamentals of quality of education. The quality of education provides base line for survival in global knowledge based societies. Government of Pakistan aspires in national education policies, the quality of education should be improved (Govt of Pakistan, 2004) . Therefore the quality of education will be assured through establishing National Testing Service (Govt of Pakistan, 2003) . Ministry of Education indicated alarming situation concerning quality of education (Govt of Pakistan, 1998) . It is evident from above statements that Government of Pakistan is determined to assure and enhance the quality of education at higher education level in Pakistan. It is being increasingly complicated for Pakistan to get benefits from the worldwide information based economy without quality of higher education, (Govt of Pakistan, 2005) . It seems poor quality education system may be one of the mainly significant grounds behind the incompatibility of education and economic development. In Pakistan the purpose of establishing Higher Education Commission (HEC) is to facilitate the indigenous universities for the development of Higher Education Institutions (HEI) as centers of excellence for learning and research (Govt of Pakistan, 2002) . The HEC is maki

FAQs

What was the objective of the study?

To determine content validation of HEC quality assurance indicators used for self-assessment of academic programs at universities in Punjab province.

How were the quality assurance indicators validated?

Forty faculty experts rated the indicators using a rating scale derived from HEC quality assurance indicators, and the responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.

What methods were used to analyze the data?

The study used percentage, mean value, and standard deviation for quantitative analysis, and ANOVA to measure demographic effects.

Oct 15, 2026

Uploaded by Fans