Tokyo to LA Story - How Southern California Became the Gateway for Japanese Global Pop Art

Aug 20, 2026

The analysis traces how Los Angeles developed into a gateway for imports of Japanese contemporary culture in the West, using Japanese contemporary art as a focal case. It challenges simplistic globalization claims that cultural products move instantly by media, instead showing how success depends on networks of people and places and on selection, amplification, and transmission over time. The study highlights “Cool Japan,” industry links, and the roles of Takashi Murakami and Yoshitomo Nara.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages15

Reading Time38 min

AccessFree to download

Introduction

Rethinking Globalization and Cultural Mobility

From Peripheral Japan to the Dominant West

Cool Japan and Institutional Promotion

Los Angeles as the Key Entry Point

Case Focus: Contemporary Art and Global Success

ADRIAN FAVELL Tokyo to LA Story How Southern California became the Gateway for a Japanese Global Pop Art Phenomenon An analysis of the demographic and geographic conditions that have enabled Los Angeles (LA) to become a gateway for imports of Japanese contemporary cultures in the West, illustrated with the case of Japanese contemporary art, and the international success stories of Takashi Murakami and Yoshitomo Nara. By Adrian Favell Globalization’s most enthusiastic proponents (Lash and Urry 1994, Appadurai 1996, Friedman 2005) often talk about global culture as if, with new technology and ubiquitous media and internet saturation, cultural forms are now effortlessly mobile, and simply flash around the planet at the speed of light. Space and time have collapsed, and we are all allegedly consuming the same global cultural products from Beijing to Bratislava, or Los Angeles to Kuala Lumpur. Trace the actual movements of any particular product, however, and it can be seen it often took many years and any numbers of entrepreneurial hands and minds for a local cultural phenomenon to turn into a global success. Invariably this process involves connections between particular people and places, as well as quite specific dynamics of selection, amplification and transmission. There is a role for global sociology, therefore, to restore empirical good sense to the excesses of global social theory (see Smith and Favell 2007; a parallel agenda can be found in Burawoy 2000) . It might aim to trace in very human terms how and why, via social networks, mobile biographies and contingent events, certain cultural products – but not others – have moved around the planet, transcended their origins, changed meanings, and shifted given power hierarchies. As befits a more global age, it can be particularly interesting to see how certain cultural products have, via these dynamics, moved from peripheral or nonWestern locations to the still culturally dominant West. Japanese popular culture is often mentioned in this context as a characteristic new kind of culture of the recent global age, coming out of a geographical and societal source that is neither America nor Europe (Iwabuchi 2002) . There has, without doubt, been a craze for Japanese popular culture in the West, centring on the contents and visual industries of manga/anime, videogames, and character based toys (Kelts 2006, Allison 2006) . After the potential of Japan’s new “Gross National Cool” was anointed by the American journalist Douglas McGray (2002), as an alternative source of international “soft power” for a Japan facing steep industrial and financial decline in the post-80s’bubble era, the Japanese government has sought to seize all possible opportunities to promote these cultural products in the West as a way of restoring the brand image of the nation (Shiraishi 1997, Watanabe and McConnell 2008). Interestingly, the national self-promotion that can easily work with popular forms of culture such as manga/anime, is also often linked with certain forms of“high” culture, that seem to draw on or connect in someway with the obvious appeal of such pop culture, and which have also become variably noted or influential in the West in recent years: notably fashion, design, architecture, literature and contemporary art. While there has been much analysis of the meaning and critical significance of these cultural transmissions in contemporary cultural studies (i.e., in Japanese studies, Richie 2003, Looser 2006, Napier 2007), the predominantly textual and semiotic methodologies used by such scholars are not well placed to really get behind the imagery or semantics of globalisation, and reveal the selection mechanisms and business dynamics that might account for how and why some of these cultural products have become globally successful. I here intend to offer a case study that might be a model for a particular kind of alternative global sociology of culture. The success of “Cool Japan

FAQs

Why does the article argue that cultural products do not move effortlessly in globalization?

It contends that real diffusion usually takes years and multiple entrepreneurial actors. Movement relies on specific social connections and on selection, amplification, and transmission dynamics rather than instant media circulation.

What role does “Cool Japan” play in promoting Japanese culture in the West?

The article explains that “Cool Japan” required active fabrication by creators and business entrepreneurs. It also describes how Japanese self-promotion leverages popular and “high” culture forms to restore national brand image.

Why is Los Angeles singled out as the gateway for Japanese contemporary culture?

Los Angeles is presented as a starting point for diffusion across the US and a central hub in global visual and music industries. The Tokyoto-LA pathway is framed as a concrete example of how Japanese cultural success was incubated and transmitted.

Aug 20, 2026

Uploaded by นรินทร์