The efficacy and the safety of supraglottic airway in therapeutic procedure of trachea via flexible bronchoscopy compared with endotracheal intubation

Q: Why is airway management difficult during flexible bronchoscopy for tracheal lesions?

Because ventilation and instrumentation must share the airway, making breathing management challenging during the procedure.

Q: How did supraglottic airway performance compare with endotracheal intubation?

Supraglottic airway use reduced repeated airway manipulations, improved lowest oxygen saturation, and was associated with earlier weaning and shorter hospital stays, while ventilation measures were comparable.

Sep 29, 2026

Uploaded by Finn

Flexible bronchoscopy is widely used for therapeutic interventions in tracheal lesions, yet airway management is challenging because clinicians must share the airway for both ventilation and instrumentation. Endotracheal intubation offers airway security but may require repeated tube insertion/removal and can restrict bronchoscope maneuverability due to a smaller internal lumen. This study compared supraglottic airway use with endotracheal intubation during tracheal therapeutic procedures under general anesthesia, evaluating repeated airway manipulations, oxygenation, ventilation, recovery, and complications.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryHealthcare

FormatPDF

Pages5

Reading Time13 min

AccessFree to download

Abstract

1. INTRODUCTION

Background and challenges of airway management

J Chin MedAssoc Original article The efficacy and the safety of supraglottic airway in therapeutic procedure of trachea via flexible bronchoscopy compared with endotrachealintubation Chao-Lan Huanga,b, Chien-Sheng Huangc,d, Yi-Ying Leec,d, Chun-Ching Lue,f, Ting-Yun Chianga,b, Wei-Nung Tenga,b, Wen-Kuei Changa,b Chien-Kun Tinga,g,* aDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; bDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; cDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; dDivision of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; eDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan, ROC; fDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; gInstitute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC Abstract Background: Flexible bronchoscopy is frequently employed for therapeutic interventions in tracheal lesions, but airway management during these procedures is challenging due to the need to share the airway for both ventilation and instrumentation. Endotracheal intubation, while providing a secure airway, often requires repeated insertion and removal of the tube to allow for bronchoscopic access. Additionally, the narrower internal diameter of the endotracheal tube can limit the maneuverability of the bronchoscope, making procedures more technically demanding. In contrast, the supraglottic airway (SGA)—originally developed by an anesthesiologist known as laryngeal mask—is a less invasive device that sits above the larynx and forms a seal around the glottic opening to allow for effective ventilation. SGAs typically have a wider lumen and do not require repeated placement during procedures, offering a more convenient and potentially safer conduit for flexible bronchoscopy. Despite these advantages, direct comparative evidence on the safety and efficacy of SGA vs endotracheal intubation in this context remains lacking. Methods: We reviewed charts and perioperative data regarding patients who underwent tracheal therapeutic procedures using flexible bronchoscopy under general anesthesia at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2019 and 2024. The primary outcome was the total number of repeated airway manipulations required. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation, ventilation, length of hospital stay, and procedure-related complications. Results: A total of 65 procedures were analyzed. There was a significantly higher proportion of female patients in the SGA group (67 .7%) compared with the endotracheal intubation group (22 .9%, p < 0 .001) . Mann–Whitney U tests revealed a significant reduction in the requirement for repeated airway manipulations with the SGA compared with endotracheal intubation (p < 0.001) . The median lowest oxygen saturation was higher with SGA (97% vs 94%, p = 0.001), while end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) levels were comparable (45 vs 44 mmHg, p = 0.94) . In addition, patients in the SGA group were weaned from mechanical ventilation earlier and had significantly shorter hospital stays (5 .5 vs 30 days, p < 0 .001) . Conclusion: Compared with endotracheal intubation, the SGA is an effective alternative for airway management during therapeutic tracheal procedures using flexible bronchoscopy. It reduces the need for repeated airway manipulation, provides better oxygenation with comparable ventilation, maintains continuous airway control, and serves as a reliable conduit for bronchoscope insertion. Keywords: Airway management; Endotracheal intubation; Flexible bronchoscopy Supraglottic airway; Therapeutic tracheal procedures [www.ejcma.org](www.ejcma.org) 681 Huang et al. J Chin MedAssoc Lay Summary:

FAQs

Why is airway management difficult during flexible bronchoscopy for tracheal lesions?

Because ventilation and instrumentation must share the airway, making breathing management challenging during the procedure.

What was the primary outcome in this study?

The primary outcome was the total number of repeated airway manipulations required.

How did supraglottic airway performance compare with endotracheal intubation?

Supraglottic airway use reduced repeated airway manipulations, improved lowest oxygen saturation, and was associated with earlier weaning and shorter hospital stays, while ventilation measures were comparable.

Sep 29, 2026

Uploaded by Finn