PEMEX Exploración y Producción Trial - Ordinary Civil Federal Trial Lawsuit - Claim for Contract Payments and Expenses

Aug 26, 2026

Upload by Terk

Ordinary civil federal trial lawsuit concerning Pemex Exploración y Producción and related companies, filed under federal procedural and civil code provisions. The document states authority for administering estimations, billing, payment presentation, and common administrative and representation acts, including notification address and authorization to use electronic means. It sets out requested benefits: contractual differences in minimum sums, payment of non-recoverable expenses due to work suspensions, and financial expenses tied to delayed or unpaid estimations, with amounts to be determined through an incident of execution of sentence.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages3

Reading Time8 min

AccessFree to download

Case Background and Parties

Powers of Administration and Representation

Address for Notifications and Electronic Means

Claims and Benefits

Contractual Difference Payment

Non-Recoverable Expenses from Suspensions

Work Orders and Suspension Periods

Financial Expenses for Unpaid Claims

FINLEY RESOURCES, INC DRAKE-MESA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V. AND DRAKE-FINLEY S. DE R. L. DE C.V. v. PEMEX EXPLORACIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN TRIAL: ORDINARY CIVIL FEDERAL TRIAL LAWSUIT […] In this sense, through this document it is agreed that the company Drake-Finley, S. de R. L. de C.V. , will be the one in charge of presenting the estimations, the bills of everyone and each one of the payments derived from the contract, to charge for the works carried out under the contract No. 421004821, as well as to carry out each one of the common acts of administration and representation in the contract. Likewise, I state that the address to hear and receive all kinds of notifications is the one located in the Puente de San Francisco street, No. 53, Barrio Cuadrante de San Francisco, Coyoacán, Zip Code 04230, in Mexico City. Similarly, we require to be authorized to use the electronic mobile devices, in accordance to the Communication 12/2009, of March 18, 2009, issued by the Executive Secretary of the Full Council of the Federal Judiciary. Authorizing to hear and receive all kinds of notifications, documents, securities, the use of electronic means, as well as to attend Hearings and stand before decisions, to the Attorneys at Law Cristina Vizcaíno Díaz, José Alejandro Jiménez Chaires, César Herrera García and Mario Alejandro Solís Sisniega, and for the same effects to the Law students Karla Lisset Sierra Vizcaíno, Adriana Viridiana Fuentes Valencia, Susana Campos Mérida, Raúl Ramírez González and Erick Velázquez Hernández before your Honor, with all due respect, hereby set out: That by means of this writ, and in accordance to what is established in articles 322, 323 and 324 of the Federal Code of Civil Procedures and 1792, 1793, 1794, 1803 and 1851 of the Federal Civil Code. I come to sue in the FEDERAL CIVIL ORDINARY WAY to PEMEX EXPLORACIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN (hereinafter PEP and/or defendant and/or the parastatal company), whose address to be served is the one located in the Paseo Tabasco Avenue, number 1203, Enterprise Tower, 16th floor, Lindavista, Zip Code 86050, in Villahermosa City, Mexico. The above for the payment and compliance with the following: BENEFITS 1.- In contractual compliance for the difference in the minimum sum that amounts to $120’856,548 .84 USD (One hundred twenty million eight hundred fifty-six thousand, five hundred forty-eight American dollars 84/100 USD), to which PEP was obliged, in accordance to the clause 5 of contract No. 421004821, since it was due to causes attributable to the defendant it was not possible to exercise the minimum amount to which it was obliged and consequently the actualization of the original costs of the works so it can be adjusted to the real conditions. 2.-The payment of Non-recoverable expenses derived from the suspension of works that took place during the validity of the contract, in accordance to what is established in the clause 17 of the Contract No. 421004821, before the lack of budgetary sufficiency. The above with respect to the following terms: a) It is required the payment of the sum determined as non-recovered expenses corresponding to 108 days in suspension of the working order 012-2014 of October 28, 2014, from 14 to 19 November, 2014, and from November 20 to March 1, 2015, in attention to the arguments and elements of evidence that are submitted in the lawsuit. Accounting to be determined in Incident of Execution of Sentence. b) It is required the payment that is determined as non-recovered expenses corresponding to 98 days in the Suspension of the working order No. 023/2015 of July 20, 2015, from August 8 to November 2, 2015, in attention to the arguments and elements of evidence that are submitted in the lawsuit. Accounting to be determined in Incident of Execution of Sentence. c) It is required the payment that is determined as non-recovered expenses corresponding to 105 days in the Suspension of the working order No. 027-2015 of December 24, 2015, fro

FAQs

What is the lawsuit procedure and defendant described in the document?

The filing is brought in the federal civil ordinary way, against PEMEX EXPLORACIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN (PEP) as defendant.

What kinds of payment does the plaintiff request under the benefits section?

The document requests payment of the contractual minimum-sum difference, non-recoverable expenses arising from suspension of works, and financial expenses derived from delayed or unpaid estimations.

How does the document handle the amounts for suspensions and related costs?

It specifies sums tied to suspension days under multiple work orders, and states that accounting will be determined in an Incident of Execution of Sentence.

Aug 26, 2026

Upload by Terk