Nipah pseudovirus system enables evaluation of vaccines in vitro and in vivo using non-BSL-4 facilities - Correction

Sep 30, 2026

Uploaded by Putri

Correction notice for the journal article "Nipah pseudovirus system enables evaluation of vaccines in vitro and in vivo using non-BSL-4 facilities". The original online version contained an incorrect Figure 2: in Figure 2d, the image labeled 2.0×105 was mistakenly duplicated from the 1.0×106 image. Review of the underlying data confirmed the corrected group outcomes, with no impact on the results for animal infectious dose determination or the study’s overall conclusions, and the figure is updated for manuscript rigor.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryHealthcare

FormatPDF

Pages1

Reading Time3 min

AccessFree to download

Correction

Incorrect Figure 2d assembly

Data review and impact assessment

Corrected Figure 2

Emerging Microbes & Infections 2026, VOL. 15, 2609512 (1 pages) [https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2025.2609512](https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2025.2609512) Correction Article title: Nipah pseudovirus system enables evaluation of vaccines in vitro and in vivo using non-BSL-4 facilities Authors: Nie J., Liu L., Wang Q., Chen R., Ning T., Liu Q., Huang W. and Wang Y. Journal: Emerging Microbes & Infections Volume 8 Issue 1 DOI: [https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2019.1571871](https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2019.1571871) When this article was first published online Figure 2 was incorrect. An inadvertent figure-assembly error in Figure 2d where the image for the 2 .0×105 incorrectly duplicated the 1 .0×106 image (marked with a red square) . This figure (Fig. 2d) is intended to determine the animal infectious dose. By reviewing the original data, we found the original image of this group. The number of mice with positive detection in this dose group was also four (out of five), which is consistent with the positive-conversion rate in the misused image. Therefore, this will not affect the results of this part or the conclusions of the article. We have thoroughly reviewed the data and confirm this error does not affect the overall conclusions ofthe study. However, to ensure the rigor of the manuscript and avoid potential misunderstandings, we wish to correct this figure as follows. Corrected Figure 2. © 2025 The Author(s) . Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of Shanghai Shangyixun Cultural Communication Co., Ltd This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

FAQs

What was the mistake in the original online version?

Figure 2 was incorrect due to an inadvertent figure-assembly error in Figure 2d, where the 2.0×10^5 image duplicated the 1.0×10^6 image.

Does the correction change the study’s results or conclusions?

No. The authors reviewed the original data and state the error does not affect the results of that part (animal infectious dose determination) or the article’s overall conclusions.

Why did the authors publish a correction?

To ensure the rigor of the manuscript and avoid potential misunderstandings by correcting the figure accordingly.

Sep 30, 2026

Uploaded by Putri