Nature Knows No Color-Line - Research into the Negro Ancestry in the White Race - J. A. Rogers

Aug 2, 2026

Nature Knows No Color-Line examines racial categories as historical and biological constructs, arguing that “race” is not fixed but changes over time under natural and environmental influence. The text traces competing theories about human origins and explains how older worldviews shifted with discoveries from the New World to scientific and philosophical debates. It then surveys claims and evidence across multiple regions and eras, including ancient Europe, Rome, Iberia, Greece and the Ottoman sphere, early Anglo-Saxon and colonial America, and later mixed marriages.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages252

Reading Time10 h 35 min

AccessFree to download

Contents

Foreword

Where Did the Color Problem Originate? And Why

Color Prejudice among Whites Themselves

Negroes in Ancient Europe—Greece

Whites and Blacks in Ancient Rome

Racial Intermixture in Spain and Portugal

The Negro as “Moor” Aristocratic European Families

Whites and Blacks in Greece, Turkey, Italy, Germany

Negro Ancestry in the French

Negro Ancestry in the Anglo-Saxons

Negro Ancestry in White America

Recent Mixed Marriages

Appendix—Miscellany on Race Mixture

Appendix—General Miscellany

Index

Nature Knows No Color-Line RESEAR9q INTO TqE NEGRO AN9ESTRY IN TqE WqITE RA9E bŮ J. A. ROGERS Authoł ɦFłoĞ SupełĞağ to Mağ,ɧ ɦSeŭ ağd RaceɧɌ Wołldɩs Głeat Meğ of 9oloł,ɧ etc. etc. 8eautŮ, thou Ũild fağtastic ape Who dost iğ eŧełŮ couğtłŮ chağge thŮ shape qełe black, hełebłoŨğ, hełe taŨğŮ ağd thełe Ũhite. AbłahaĞ 9oŨleŮ ɘȒȗȒș-ȒȗȘȘə ɦThou ałe Ũhite ağd I aĞ black but daŮ Ğustjoiğ Ũith ğight to błiğg fołth the daŨğ ağd the tŨilight Ũhich ałe Ğołe beautiful thağ theŮ .ɧ Victoł qugo. qELGA M. ROGERS ȓșș 8each Dłiŧe NE Ȗ9 St. Petełsbułg FL ȔȔȘȑȒ © 9opŮłight ȒȚȖȓ ReğeŨed ȒȚșȑ qelga M. Rogełs All łights łesełŧed Thiłd Editioğ IS8Nɋ ȑ-ȚȗȑȓȓȚȕ-Ȗ-ȑ Płiğted iğ the Uğited States ofAĞełica. CONTENTS FOREWORD I. WqERE DID TqE 9OLOR PRO8LEM ORIGINATE? AND WqY II. 9OLOR PREJUDI9EAMONGWqITES TqEMSELVES III. NEGROES IN AN9IENT EUROPE—GREE9E IV. WqITES AND 8LA9KS IN AN9IENT ROME V. RA9IAL INTERMIXTURE IN SPAIN AND PORTUGAL VI. TqE NEGRO AS ɦMOOR.ɧ ARISTO9RATI9 EUROPEAN FAMILIES VII. WqITESAND 8LA9KS IN GREE9E, TURKEY, ITALY, GERMANY VIII. NEGRO AN9ESTRY IN TqE FREN9q IX. NEGRO AN9ESTRY IN TqE ANGLO-SAXONS X. NEGRO AN9ESTRY IN WqITE AMERI9A XI. RE9ENT MIXED MARRIAGES APPENDIX—MIS9ELLANY ON RA9E MIXTURE APPENDIX—GENERAL MIS9ELLANY INDEX Ȓ ȗ ȒȘ ȓȘ ȕȔ ȖȖ ȗȚ ȒȒȒ ȒȕȔ ȒȖȗ ȒșȚ ȓȑș ȓȒȕ ȓȒș ȓȔȖ FOREWORD ɠIğ the histołical aĞplitude of life oğ eałth łaces haŧe beeğ iğ a state of fluŭ. Authołities oğ płehistołic łaces poiğt to this as a fact ağd eŧeğ the błief spağ of histołic łecołd affołds iğstağcesas illustłatioğs of hoŨ łaces haŧe falleğ. It does ğot ğeed thepłophetic eŮe theğ to see that łaces Ũill coğtiğue to chağge. Iğ coğseŁueğce łace as soĞethiğgpełĞağeğtbecoĞes ağ ałtificial ğotioğ, a ĞŮth. What Ũe call łaces ałe ĞełelŮ teĞpołałŮ eddies iğ the histołŮ of huĞağkiğd. ɡ T. R. Gałth.ɒ ȓ ɓ ɠEŧełŮoğe aliŧe is, I aĞ coğŧiğced, of Ğiŭed ağcestłŮ but soĞe of us ałe Ğołe Ũhite, soĞe of us ĞołeNegło, soĞe of us Ğołe Chiğese. ɡ q. G. Wells. ɒ Ȕ ɓ What Ũas the fiłst Ğağ like ağd of Ũhat ɦłaceɧ? Was he 9aucasiağ oł Negło, black oł Ũhite? Oł ałe both the eŧolutioğ of soĞe otheł tŮpe? The ağcieğt Głeeks belieŧed that black Ğağ Ũas Ũhite Ğağ dałkeğed bŮ the suğ . Theił ĞŮthologŮ saŮs that Phaetoğ, soğ of qelios, the Suğ-God, iğduced his fatheł to let hiĞ dłiŧe the chałiot ofthe suğ oğe daŮ ağd iğ his lack of skill dłoŧe it too ğeał cełtaiğ lağds ağd bułğt black Ũith iğteğse heat the peoples thełe. Theił poet, Theodectes, attłibuted the ɦsootŮɧ skiğ ağd ɦcułledɧ haił of the Ethiopiağs to this Ğishap, ağd 9aedĞağ, Ağglo-Saŭoğ poet of about ȗȘȑ A.D., called the Ethiopiağs ɦa łace bułğed błoŨğ bŮ the heat of the suğ .ɧ This belief held uğtil the discoŧełŮ of the NeŨ Wołld iğ the fifteeğth ceğtułŮ Ũheğ it gładuallŮ shifted to the theołŮ that Ğağ ołigiğated iğ the tłopicsɌ that soĞe peoples, eitheł because theŮĞigłated iğto cold sğoŨŮ lağds, oł because the cliĞate chağged to that, lost soĞe oftheił coloł ağdtheił haił głeŨ loğgeł to płotect the scalp. AĞoğg the eałlieł Ũłitełs Ũho Ũełe iğcliğed to this theołŮ Ũełe Pallas, Lacepede, quğteł, Dołğik ağd Liğk. Lateł oğes Ũełe Płichałd, Schopeğhaueł, 9haĞbełs, ağd DałŨiğ . 9haĞbełs Ũhose ɦVestiges of the Natułal qistołŮ of the 9łeatioğ,ɧ Ũas to haŧe iĞĞeğse iğflueğce oğ DałŨiğ, said that, Ğağ begiğiğg as a Negło, passed thłough MalaŮ, Iğdiağ ağd Moğgoliağ ağd fiğallŮ łeached 9aucasiağ . ɦThe leadiğg chałacteł, iğ shołt,ɧ he said, ɦof the ŧałious łaces of Ğağkiğd ałe siĞplŮ łepłeseğtatioğs of pałticulał stages of deŧelopĞeğt ofthe highest, oł 9aucasiağ tŮpe.ɧ ɘ Ȕ ə AĞoğg łeceğt oğes Ũho thought that Ũhite Ğağ eŧolŧed fłoĞ a Ğuch dałkeł tŮpe ałe Voğ Luschağ, Fiğot, Vełğeau, Głiffith TaŮloł W. K. GłegołŮ ağd 8iğet-Sağgle. Sełgi thought Eułopeağs ŨełeołigiğallŮ Afłicağs. ɘ ȕ ə This is cełtaiğɋ Abuğdağt eŧideğces that Afłicağ Negłoids oğce iğhabited Eułope as fał ğołth as Russia haŧe beeğ fouğd ağd ałe to be seeğ iğ the ĞuseuĞs of

FAQs

What central idea does the book present about race categories?

The work argues that race is not a stable, natural boundary; it changes through time and is shaped by natural conditions and historical processes.

Why does the foreword emphasize that the “color problem” is historical?

It links changing beliefs about human origins to shifting evidence and scientific-philosophical developments, implying that race notions evolve with time and discovery.

What regions and historical periods does the book cover?

It surveys claims across ancient Europe and classical Rome, Iberia, Greece and surrounding regions, then moves to the “Moor” in European families, the French, Anglo-Saxons, and White America, ending with recent mixed marriages.

Aug 2, 2026

Upload by Clementine