Generalist Practice - Summary of Outcomes - Updated 9/3/26

Sep 29, 2026

Upload by OmBimo

Generalist Practice summary detailing student competency assessment outcomes and reporting plans for the 09/25–05/26 timeframe. Results are presented by competency with an expected achievement level of 80% and program option outcomes for Xavier University. The plan section lists instruments used to measure each competency, including rubric-based writing and cultural immersion, evidence-based practice assignments, communication demonstration videos, client risk/protective factor evaluations, interprofessional reflection, and field evaluations requiring minimum scores across component behaviors.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryExam

FormatPDF

Pages4

Reading Time10 min

AccessFree to download

Generalist Practice | Summary of Outcomes

Timeframe, posting date, and update

Competency outcomes (expected vs. program option 1)

Form AS B5.0.1(d) | Public Reporting of Assessment Outcomes

Generalist Practice | Summary of Plan

Competency-to-instrument mapping and expected achievement

Generalist Practice | Summary of Outcomes Timeframe of Student Competency Assessment: 09/25-05/26 Date Publicly Posted on Program’s Website: 09/26 Updated 9/3/26 | Competency | Competency:
Expected Level of Achievement Inclusive of All Instruments | Program Option 1 Outcomes:
Xavier University n = (26) | | --- | --- | --- | | Competency 1 | 80% | 96.5% | | Competency 2 | 80% | 73.5% | | Competency 3 | 80% | 95.5% | | Competency 4 | 80% | 93.5% | | Competency 5 | 80% | 95% | | Competency 6 | 80% | 100% | | Competency 7 | 80% | 100% | | Competency 8 | 80% | 92% | | Competency 9 | 80% | 76.5% | Form AS B5.0.1(d) | Public Reporting of Assessment Outcomes Xavier University Generalist Practice | Summary of Plan | Competency | Instrument | Instrument:
Expected Level of Achievement for Instrument | Competency:
Expected Level of Achievement for Competency | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Competency 1 | Instrument 1: Religion, Ethics, and Professional Practice Competency Assessment | Students must achieve a rating of competent in both Code of Ethics (Question A) and Ethical DecisionMaking (Question C) . | 80% | | | Instrument 2: Final Field Evaluation | Students must score a minimum of 3 out of 5 on all component behaviors (1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 1g,1i, 1j) | | | Competency 2 | Instrument 1: Write an Effective Letter (to a legislator) | Students must achieve a rating of “competent” or higher in 3 out of 4 criteria on the grading rubric. | 80% | | | Instrument 2: Final Field Evaluation | Students must score a minimum of 3 out of 5 on all component behaviors (2a, 2b) | | | Competency 3 | Instrument 1: Cultural Immersion (assignment and reflection) | Students must score competent or higher on rubric line items 1, 2, & 3. | 80% | | | Instrument 2: Final Field Evaluation | Students must score a minimum of 3 out of 5 on all component behaviors (3a, 3b) | | | Competency 4 | Instrument 1: Evidence-Based Practice Assignment | Student is rated as good or excellent on rubric line item 1 (Comp 4: specifically, thoughtfully, and | 80% | | | | critically connected the article to their practice.) | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | Instrument 2: Final Field Evaluation | Students must score a minimum of 3 out of 5 on all component behaviors (4a, 4b) | | | Competency 5 | Instrument 1: Policy Analysis Paper | Students must score 80% of the total points available for criterion line items 1, 2, & 3. | 80% | | | Instrument 2: Final Field Evaluation | Students must score a minimum of 3 out of 5 on all component behaviors (5a, 5b) | | | Competency 6 | Instrument 1: Communication Skills Demonstration Video | Students’ demonstration of empathic skills was rated competent in at least 4 out of 5 criterion line items on the assessment rubric (nonverbal comm, active listening, reflecting, ease, mistakes in comm) | 80% | | | Instrument 2: Final Field Evaluation | Students must score a minimum of 3 out of 5 on all component behaviors (6a, 6b) | | | Competency 7 | Instrument 1: Video Client Assessment | Students must be rated competent or above on item 1 (Identification of risk factors) & 2 (identification of Protective factors) on the grading rubric. | 80% | | | Instrument 2: Final Field Evaluation | Students must score a minimum of 3 out of 5 on all component behaviors (7a, 7b) | | | Competency 8 | Instrument 1: Interprofessional Teaming Symposium Reflection | Students must be rated as competent on rubric line-item 1. | 80% | | | Instrument 2: Final Field Evaluation | Students must score a minimum of 3 out of 5 | | | | | on all component behaviors (8a, 8b) | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Competency 9 | Instrument 1: Evaluate the Program Evaluation | Students must achieve a rating of “competent” or higher in 2 out of the 3 rubric line items (1, 2, 3 -Formative Evaluation
-Outcome Evaluation
-Conclusion) | 80% | | | Instrument 2: Final Field Evaluation | Students must score a minimum of 3 out of 5 on all component be

FAQs

What is the assessment timeframe and when were results publicly posted?

The student competency assessment timeframe is 09/25-05/26, and the date publicly posted on the program’s website is 09/26. The document is updated 9/3/26.

What expected achievement level is used for the competencies?

Each competency uses an expected level of achievement inclusive of all instruments of 80%.

Which types of instruments are used to evaluate competencies?

The plan lists rubric-based instruments (e.g., ethical decision-making, effective letters, cultural immersion reflection, evidence-based practice assignment, policy analysis paper, communication skills demonstration video, and client assessment video) plus a Final Field Evaluation that requires minimum scores across component behaviors.

Sep 29, 2026

Upload by OmBimo