EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE MODULE IN ENHANCING WORKING DRAWING MASTERY AMONG ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS

Oct 28, 2026

This research analyzes the effectiveness of a step-by-step learning module for improving working drawing mastery among Semester 2 Diploma in Architecture students taking DCA20333: Working Drawing 1. The study focuses on how the module supports the transition from manual drafting to CADD applications, addressing students’ difficulties in interpreting technical symbolism, annotation standards, and drawing arrangement logic aligned with industry practice. A survey questionnaire gathers student feedback on assessment achievement, and results are expected to improve technical understanding and drawing quality efficiency. Findings aim to underpin a Step-By-Step Guide: Working Drawing 1 reference.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages7

Reading Time18 min

AccessFree to download

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Problem Statement

3. Objectives

4. Literature Review

4.1 Significance of Working Drawings and Learning Challenges

4.2 Pedagogical Approach

4.3 Synergy of Manual Skills and Digital Adaptation

EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE MODULE IN ENHANCING WORKING DRAWING MASTERY AMONG ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS Rafidah bt Suib 1 , Norzalina bt Md Yusop2 , Siti Amirah Mohtaram3 , 1,2,3 Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Port Dickson, Malaysia [rafidahsuib@polipd.edu.my](rafidahsuib@polipd.edu.my) ABSTRACT Objective: This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of a step-by-step learning module in improving the mastery of working drawings among Semester 2 Diploma in Architecture students for the course DCA20333: Working Drawing 1. The primary focus of the study is to evaluate the extent to which this module assists students in mastering the transition between manual drawing skills and CADD applications, which form the core of the course assessment. A common problem faced by students at this stage is confusion in understanding technical symbolism, annotation standards, and the logic of drawing arrangement that complies with industry practices. Research Method: This study utilizes a survey method involving the distribution of questionnaires to obtain student feedback on the effectiveness of the module regarding their assessment achievement Findings: The results are expected to show that the systematic use of the module significantly enhances technical understanding and accelerates the process of completing quality drawings. Originality: The research findings will serve as a solid foundation to support the publication of the book Step-By-Step Guide: Working Drawing 1 as a primary reference material for the DCA20333 course, thereby bridging the gap between academic theory and practical requirements in the field of architecture. Keywords: working drawing, CADD, architecture, technical 1. INTRODUCTION Course DCA20333: Working Drawing 1 is essential for establishing a foundation in construction documentation. Mastery of manual drafting is mandatory before progressing to CADD, ensuring students grasp technical details thoroughly. As noted by Ibrahim et al. (2019), this proficiency signifies the capacity to interpret structural logic and maintain industry compliance. Therefore, it is crucial to equip students with systematic workflows to ensure the production of high-quality, comprehensive architectural drawings. 2. PROBLEM STATEMENT Second-year students often encounter significant challenges in adapting to the working drawing phase, which demands high technical precision. Based on observations, the identified issues include: 2.1 Procedural Confusion: Students demonstrate an inability to organize drawing elements according to the correct hierarchy, a critical requirement as discussed by Wakita et al. (2022) . 2.2 Digital Adaptation Constraints: There is a notable gap in applying technical understanding derived from manual methods into the digital CADD environment (Hamzah & Yusof, 2021) . 2.3 Lack of Specific Reference Materials: The limited availability of structured reference materials aligned specifically with the DCA20333 curriculum increases student over-reliance on continuous lecturer guidance. This situation reinforces Hassan’s (2021) argument regarding the urgent need for more systematic, phased teaching aids. 3. OBJECTIVES 3.1 To identify the level of student understanding regarding the sequence of working drawing production through the step-by-step module. 3.2 To evaluate the effectiveness of the module in assisting students to complete manual drawing and CADD assessments. 3.3 To examine student perceptions of the necessity of the "Step-By-Step Guide: Working Drawing 1" guidebook as a self-referenced learning tool. 4. LITERATURE REVIEW 4.1 SIGNIFICANCE OF WORKING DRAWINGS AND LEARNING CHALLENGES Within the architectural discipline, working drawings serve as critical communication instruments and legal documents essential for translating design visions into physical execution on-site. Wakita et al. (2022) emphasize that failure toadhere to technical drawi

FAQs

What is the main objective of the study?

To analyze how effectively a step-by-step learning module enhances working drawing mastery among Semester 2 Diploma in Architecture students for DCA20333: Working Drawing 1.

What research method is used to evaluate the module?

A survey method using questionnaires to collect student feedback about the module’s effectiveness in relation to their assessment outcomes.

What challenges are students expected to face that the module targets?

Confusion in interpreting technical symbolism and annotation standards, as well as difficulty managing the logic of drawing arrangement and transitioning from manual drawing to CADD.

Oct 28, 2026

Upload by cryingin4k