Demesne or leasehold? - Estate management in southern Flanders during the price shocks of the fourteenth century

Sep 17, 2026

This article examines how large landlords in southern Flanders managed grain production during late medieval crisis conditions marked by fourteenth-century price shocks. It analyzes the two principal channels of harvest and control—direct demesne exploitation and leaseholds—and asks how landlords adapted property use toward cereal production. By linking grain income and expenditure management to provisioning outcomes, the study evaluates landlords’ influence on urban access to food amid systemic transition.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages45

Reading Time1 h 53 min

AccessFree to download

Introduction

Focus and research questions

Context: market shocks and landlord adaptation

This item is the archived peer-reviewed author-version of: Demesne or leasehold? Estate management in southern Flanders during the price shocks of the fourteenth century Reference: Espeel Stef.-Demesne or leasehold? Estate management in southern Flanders during the price shocks of the fourteenth century Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire / Société pour le progrès des études philologiques et historiques [Bruxelles] - ISSN 0035-0818-100(2022), p. 275-304 To cite this reference: [https://hdl.handle.net/10067/2004620151162165141](https://hdl.handle.net/10067/2004620151162165141) Institutional repository IRUA Demesne or Leasehold? Estate Management in Southern Flanders during the Price Shocks of the Fourteenth Century(1) Stef ESPEEL University of Antwerp, Centre for Urban History Introduction In many respects, the price history of the fourteenth century confirms the idea of an ‘Age of Shocks’, a century characterised by a rapid succession of disruptive events. In his recent The Great Transition, Bruce Campbell provides a powerful argument for the existence of a period of pronounced socio-environmental instability between the ‘enabling environment’ of the Medieval Warm Period, and the more challenging Little Ice Age conditions(2) . Confronted with the ‘wrath of nature’, fourteenth-century European society might appear rather vulnerable and powerless. Nevertheless, people did not stop reacting and adapting and the diversity in reactions to the great shocks ofthe fourteenth century might reveal part of the causal mechanisms behind them. This article focuses on the strategies for grain production by large landlords in times of crisis. The two main channels through which these landlords could harvest grain in late medieval Flanders were the direct exploitation of demesnes on the one hand, and leaseholds on the other. ( 1) This article is based on a chapter of my doctoral dissertation entitled Prices and Crises. The Grain Economy in Fourteenth-Century Flanders, defended in August 2021 at the University of Antwerp under the supervision of Prof Dr Tim Soens and Prof Dr Alexis Wilkin (Université Libre de Bruxelles) . I thank Tim Soens and Alexis Wilkin for their valuable aid and feedback and the members of the jury of my dissertation as well as the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and expert comments on this article. The doctoral project was financially supported by the Flemish Research Foundation (FWO) Grant Shock Cities? Food Prices and Access to Food in an Age of Crises (1280-1370) and this article was also realised with the financial support of the UAntwerp TOPBOF Grant Food from Somewhere. (2) Bruce M.S. CAMPBELL, The Great Transition. Climate, Disease and Society in the LateMedieval World, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016. Landlords could easily manipulate or alter the way their land holdings were being employed in the agricultural organisation, and it is important to analyse this latter in an age of systemic transition. Which adaptations were carried out and in what direction landlords shifted the usage of their property with respect to cereal production is central. Were the price shocks, and the broader mid-fourteenth-century crisis, instrumental to the adaptations in the production and distribution of cereals? As major grain producers and collectors, sellers and consumers, landlords reacted to these price shocks on the grain market, and perhaps also shaped them, via their agricultural policies, market involvement, consumption and their collective power over producers. By focusing on the management of their grain income and expenditure during such price shocks, it is possible to understand the role the larger landlords played during grain crises, what they prioritised and what the impact of their actions was on the general urban population’s access to food. Even though convincing evidence of speculation for the maximizing of profits is limited or absent for the fourteenth centur

FAQs

What two main channels did large landlords use to harvest grain in late medieval Flanders?

They harvested through direct exploitation of demesnes and through leaseholds.

What research problem does the article center on?

It focuses on how landlords adapted property usage relating to cereal production during price shocks and broader mid-fourteenth-century crisis conditions.

How does the article connect landlord actions to food access in towns?

By examining how landlords managed grain income and expenditure during price shocks, it evaluates their role in grain crises and the impact of those actions on urban populations’ access to food.

Sep 17, 2026

Uploaded by supergirl