BSD #7 LRSP Strategic Objective 1.09 - C&I Math Intervention 2009-10

Sep 15, 2026

Uploaded by Mason

BSD #7 LRSP Strategic Objective 1.09 outlines a district-wide mathematics intervention action plan for 2009-10, aiming to improve student achievement and raise outcomes on the CRT and end-of-year math assessments. The evaluation approach tracks growth in P+ performance targets and includes baseline and follow-up MSEC surveys across grades. The plan investigates best practices, identifies instructional time and strategy needs, revises standards aligned with NCTM, and implements Everyday Math and CMP2 with Holt Algebra I alongside targeted small-group support and staff training.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages3

Reading Time8 min

AccessFree to download

Strategic Objective

SO 1.09 Implementation Approach

Evaluation Plan and Targets

Best Practice Investigation

Action Steps and Responsibilities

Action Steps Overview

Staffing, Training, and Support

Timeframe and Completion Dates

BSD\#7 LRSP Strategic Objective ACTION PLAN: 1.09 C&I Math Intervention 2009-10 | Action Plan Projected Completion Date: On-going | Leader: Assistant Superintendent
Team Members: K-5 Principals, K-5 Teachers, Curriculum Director, Instructional Coaches, Math paraprofessionals | | --- | --- | Strategic Objective (SO): 1.09 Implement plans in math intervention to improve student achievement. Evaluation Plan: (Describe steps you’ll take to determine if you’ve reached your strategic objective.) Scores on the CRT, End-of-Year Math Assessment and other formative assessments will increase with 83% of students achieving P+ by 2011. Best Practice Investigation (What information is uncovered looking at best practice in relation to your strategic objective.) Research indicates that some students need a greater amount of time and variety of strategies in order to achieve proficiency. The math intervention plan provides additional time and resources for students with demonstrated need in the area of mathematics. | Action Steps
What actions will be taken to achieve this SO? Include what staff may need to learn to accomplish this SO. | Who?
Who will be responsible for what actions? |

Timeframe What is a realistic timeframe
for each action?

1. Completed fall 2006
2. Completed fall 2006
3. Completed spring 2007
4. Completed spring 2007
5. Completed spring 2007
6. On-going
7. Completed spring 2008 – review and evaluation ongoing
8. On-going | | --- | --- | --- | | 1. Examine CRT data to determine areas of relative strength and weakness across the district.
2. Examine district mathematics standards, looking for alignment with state and NCTM standards.
3. Examine standards from other districts and states, including Rockville Center, New York.
4. Revise district mathematics standards to align with NCTM standards and focal points and promote implementation of Algebra for All by 2011.
5. Conduct baseline MSEC survey in grades 7, 8 and 9.
6. Implement Everyday Math in grades K-5 and CMP2 in grades 6- 8 in conjunction with Holt Algebra I.
7. Conduct MSEC survey in grades 6-9.
8. Examine CRT scores in grades 3-8 and 10. | 1. Math CLT
2. Math CLT
3. Math CLT
4. Math CLT with input from principals and teachers
5. All math teachers in grade 7-9
6. All teachers and principals grades K-8
7. All math teachers in grades 6- 9
8. All teachers K-5, all math teachers grades 6-12 | | |

9. Hire math intervention paraprofessionals to work with students in grades 3-5 performing below proficiency on the CRT and demonstrated need indicated by a variety of formative assessments in the area of mathematics.
10. Train math intervention paraprofessionals and math volunteers in the use of Everyday Math instructional materials.
11. Math paraprofessionals work with targeted students in small groups under the guidance of building principals and grade 3-5 teachers and with the assistance of instructional coaches.
12. Examine CRT scores and end-of-year grade level math assessments
13. Provide training in effective math instructional practices regarding differentiated instructional strategies and teaching multiple algorithms
14. 4th and 5th grade teachers participate in grant-funded PLC program investigating trends in student performance
15. Examine alignment of Bozeman math standards with new MT math standards.
16. Utilize Americorp members to provide support in both middle schools.
17. America Counts volunteers trained in the foundations of Everyday Math and CMP2 .
18. Utilize PLC format to provide time for data analysis, pacing, and instructional strategies to differentiate instruction.
19. Work with Special Education Director and staff to examine math instructional materials, identify gaps for struggling learners and materials that will address identified need (reference RtI and Special Education Action Plans 1.09) . |

9. Buil

FAQs

What is the purpose of Strategic Objective 1.09 for math intervention?

It implements a math intervention plan to improve student achievement by increasing CRT and end-of-year math assessment performance and targeting 83% of students reaching P+ by 2011.

How will progress toward the objective be evaluated?

Progress will be determined using scores on the CRT, end-of-year math assessments, other formative assessments, and MSEC surveys across specified grades, with results compared to the spring 2008 baseline.

Which instructional programs and support structures are included in the action steps?

The plan includes implementing Everyday Math in grades K-5 and CMP2 in grades 6-8 alongside Holt Algebra I, hiring and training math intervention paraprofessionals, and providing small-group support and instructional coaching.

Sep 15, 2026

Uploaded by Mason