Asteroids co-orbital motion classification based on Machine Learning - arXiv preprint

Aug 2, 2026

This work classifies asteroids in co-orbital motion with a given planet using Machine Learning. Four resonance-related motion regimes are considered: Tadpole, Horseshoe, and Quasi-satellite, with three datasets built for training and testing. Real data use JPL Horizons ephemerides, while Ideal and Perturbed data come from simulations obtained by propagating initial conditions under two dynamical systems. A time-series pipeline extracts features from the resonance angle with tsfresh, then applies dimensionality reduction and classification, enabling performance ranking and physical interpretability plus SHAP-based explainability.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages15

Reading Time38 min

AccessFree to download

Abstract

Introduction

arXiv :2309 . 10603v1 [ astro-ph .EP] 19 Sep 2023 Asteroids co-orbital motion classification based on Machine Learning Giulia Ciacci 1★ Andrea Barucci 1† Sara Di Ruzza2‡ and Elisa Maria Alessi3 § 1IFAC-CNR, Istituto di Fisica Applicata “Nello Carrara”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy 2 Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università di Palermo, Via Archirafi 34, 90123 Palermo, Italy 3IMATI-CNR, Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie informatiche “E. Magenes”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Alfonso Corti 12, 20133 Milano, Italy Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT In this work, we explore how to classify asteroids in co-orbital motion with a given planet using Machine Learning. We consider four different kinds of motion in mean motion resonance with the planet, nominally Tadpole, Horseshoe and Quasi-satellite, building 3 datasets defined as Real (taking the ephemerides of real asteroids from the JPL Horizons system), Ideal and Perturbed (both simulated, obtained by propagating initial conditions considering two different dynamical systems) for training and testing the Machine Learning algorithms in different conditions. The time series of the variable 􀁜 (angle related to the resonance) are studied with a data analysis pipeline defined ad hoc for the problem and composed by: data creation and annotation, time series features extraction thanks to the tsfresh package (potentially followed by selection and standardization) and the application of Machine Learning algorithms for Dimensionality Reduction and Classification. Such approach, based on features extracted from the time series, allows to work with a smaller number of data with respect to Deep Learning algorithms, also allowing to define a ranking of the importance of the features. Physical Interpretability of the features is another key point of this approach. In addition, we introduce the SHapley Additive exPlanations for Explainability technique. Different training and test sets are used, in order to understand the power and the limits of our approach. The results show how the algorithms are able to identify and classify correctly the time series, with a high degree of performance. Key words: co-orbital motion – machine learning – asteroids 1 Introduction In the last decades, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for data analysis has significantly increased in scientific applications, in particular thanks to its sub-field known as Machine Learning (ML), where an algorithm is said to improve its performance on a specific task by experience (e.g., Hastie et al. 2009b; Jordan & Mitchell 2015) . More recently, many authors started to use such methods in astronomy and solar system science (e.g., Ball & Brunner 2010; Ivezić et al. 2014) . Although well-known and broadly applied in several contexts, we recall here the general concepts of AI and ML, for the sake of completeness. With AI we mean methods by which a computer makes decisions or discoveries that would usually require human intelligence, while with ML we mean automated processes that learn by examples in order to classify, predict, discover or generate new data. Part of ML is the class of algorithms known as Deep Learning (DL) which is based on artificial neural networks (e.g., LeCun et al. 2015; Goodfellow et al. 2016) . ML and DL are the key of the success of AI nowadays. There are three classes of ML algorithms (see, for example, Hastie et al. (2009a) for more ★ E-mail: [giuliaciacci8@gmail.com](giuliaciacci8@gmail.com) † E-mail: [a.barucci@ifac.cnr.it](a.barucci@ifac.cnr.it)[ ](a.barucci@ifac.cnr.it)‡ E-mail: [sara.diruzza@unipa.it](sara.diruzza@unipa.it) § E-mail: [elisamaria.alessi@cnr.it](elisamaria.alessi@cnr.it) details): supervised learning, where a labeled dataset is used to help to train and tune the algorithm, with the goal to create a map that links inputs to outpu

FAQs

How are asteroid co-orbital motion types classified in this study?

The method builds feature-based time series for the resonance angle and applies dimensionality reduction and ML classification to label the motion regimes.

What datasets are used for training and testing?

Three datasets are used: Real (from JPL Horizons ephemerides) and two simulated sets, Ideal and Perturbed, generated by propagating initial conditions under two dynamical systems.

What is the role of tsfresh and SHAP in the pipeline?

tsfresh extracts time-series features from the resonance-angle signal, and SHAP provides explainability by attributing contributions of features to the classification decisions.

Aug 2, 2026

Upload by Lucas Martin