APPENDIX - The Effects of Job Corps Training on Wages of Adolescents and Young Adults

Sep 4, 2026

Uploaded by Margaret

Appendix tables provide complete numerical results underpinning Figure 1 from a study evaluating how Job Corps training affects the wages of adolescents and young adults. Table A1 reports bounds and 95% Imbens and Manski (2004) confidence intervals for QTE in the EE stratum for ages 16–19 under specified assumptions. Table A2 presents the corresponding estimates for ages 20–24. Values include upper and lower bounds, confidence interval limits, and bootstrap-based standard errors.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages3

Reading Time8 min

AccessFree to download

Table A1

Bounds and 95% confidence intervals for adolescents (16–19)

Table A2

Bounds and 95% confidence intervals for young adults (20–24)

APPENDIX The E􀀋ects of Job Corps Training on Wages of Adolescents and Young Adults German Blanco Department of Economics, State University of New York at Binghamton [gblanco1@binghamton.edu](gblanco1@binghamton.edu) [Carlos A. Flores](Carlos A. Flores) Department of Economics, University of Miami ca􀀍ores@miami.edu Alfonso Flores-Lagunes Department of Economics, State University of New York at Binghamton and IZA a􀀍ores@binghamton.edu November 1, 2012 APPENDIX The following tables present the complete numerical results used to construct Figure 1 in the paper. Table A1 and A2 corresponds to Figure 1 (a) and (b), respectively. Table A1. Bounds and 95 percent Imbens and Manski (2004) confidence intervals for QTE of the EE stratum for adolescents (ages 16-19), under Assumptions 1, 2, 4 and X. | α-percentile | UB | UB CI | LB | LB CI | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 0.05 | 0.200 | 0.306 | 0.151 | 0.028 | | 0.10 | 0.066 | 0.118 | 0.019 | 0.001 | | 0.15 | 0.075 | 0.127 | 0.021 | -0.013 | | 0.20 | 0.051 | 0.096 | 0.043 | 0.004 | | 0.25 | 0.041 | 0.093 | 0.000 | -0.015 | | 0.30 | 0.080 | 0.143 | 0.041 | 0.018 | | 0.35 | 0.073 | 0.129 | 0.036 | 0.010 | | 0.40 | 0.074 | 0.121 | 0.041 | 0.008 | | 0.45 | 0.033 | 0.083 | 0.011 | -0.012 | | 0.50 | 0.069 | 0.128 | 0.049 | 0.022 | | 0.55 | 0.097 | 0.169 | 0.038 | 0.004 | | 0.60 | 0.065 | 0.128 | 0.065 | 0.049 | | 0.65 | 0.071 | 0.117 | 0.041 | 0.011 | | 0.70 | 0.082 | 0.144 | 0.061 | 0.039 | | 0.75 | 0.076 | 0.153 | 0.057 | 0.033 | | 0.80 | 0.080 | 0.160 | 0.075 | 0.048 | | 0.85 | 0.034 | 0.126 | 0.017 | -0.029 | | 0.90 | 0.091 | 0.252 | 0.057 | -0.006 | | 0.95 | 0.094 | 0.468 | 0.086 | 0.001 | Note: Upper and lower bounds are denoted by UB and LB, respectively. CI denotes confidence interval. Standard errors were computed by bootstrap (500 replications) . Table A2 . Bounds and 95 percent Imbens and Manski (2004) confidence intervals for QTE of the EE stratum for young adults (ages 20-24), under Assumptions 1, 2, 4 and X. | α-percentile | UB | UB CI | LB | LB CI | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 0.05 | 0.182 | 0.251 | 0.030 | -0.035 | | 0.10 | 0.132 | 0.198 | 0.017 | -0.025 | | 0.15 | 0.123 | 0.191 | 0.027 | -0.020 | | 0.20 | 0.118 | 0.176 | 0.000 | -0.031 | | 0.25 | 0.113 | 0.195 | 0.039 | -0.001 | | 0.30 | 0.130 | 0.197 | 0.051 | 0.005 | | 0.35 | 0.114 | 0.182 | 0.059 | 0.010 | | 0.40 | 0.115 | 0.162 | 0.069 | 0.044 | | 0.45 | 0.098 | 0.162 | 0.066 | 0.018 | | 0.50 | 0.089 | 0.145 | 0.065 | 0.032 | | 0.55 | 0.061 | 0.112 | 0.019 | -0.019 | | 0.60 | 0.115 | 0.179 | 0.058 | 0.026 | | 0.65 | 0.096 | 0.178 | 0.057 | 0.007 | | 0.70 | 0.080 | 0.143 | 0.054 | 0.008 | | 0.75 | 0.051 | 0.125 | 0.051 | 0.003 | | 0.80 | 0.061 | 0.124 | 0.025 | -0.017 | | 0.85 | 0.082 | 0.166 | 0.047 | -0.005 | | 0.90 | 0.093 | 0.240 | 0.054 | -0.029 | | 0.95 | 0.111 | 0.404 | 0.089 | -0.053 | Note: Upper and lower bounds are denoted by UB and LB, respectively. CI denotes confidence interval. Standard errors were computed by bootstrap (500 replications) .

FAQs

What do Table A1 and Table A2 contain?

They present complete numerical results used to construct Figure 1, including bounds and 95% Imbens and Manski (2004) confidence intervals for QTE under stated assumptions.

Which age groups are covered by Table A1 and Table A2?

Table A1 covers adolescents aged 16–19, while Table A2 covers young adults aged 20–24.

How are standard errors computed in these tables?

Standard errors are computed by bootstrap with 500 replications.

Sep 4, 2026

Uploaded by Margaret