AIDS 2024 Abstract Book - AIDS 2024, the 25th International AIDS Conference

Sep 17, 2026

AIDS 2024 abstract book presents the selection process for the 25th International AIDS Conference. Over 7,200 abstracts were submitted, reviewed through a blind peer-review system completed by more than 830 international experts in HIV. Each abstract received three to four reviews using five equally weighted criteria, generating final scores from one to six. The book also reports submission and acceptance statistics, including regular, oral, poster, e-poster, and late-breaking categories.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryHealthcare

FormatPDF

Pages1632

Reading Time68 h 33 min

AccessFree to download

Abstract submission

Track committees and review structure

Abstract statistics and acceptance

International Abstract Review Committee

Role of peer reviewers

Special thanks and reviewer list

AIDS 2024 abstract book [aids2024.org](aids2024.org) AIDS 2024, the 25th International AIDS Conference AIDS 2024 Organizing Committee IAS President and International Co-Chair Sharon Lewin, Australia Local Co-Chair Christoph Spinner, Germany Regional Co-Chair representing eastern Europe Andriy Klepikov, Ukraine Members Beatriz Grinsztejn, Brazil Birgit Poniatowski, Switzerland Kenneth Ngure, Kenya Glory Alexander, India Jacquelyne Alesi, Uganda Erika Castellanos, the Netherlands Asier Sáez-Cirión, France Susana Valente, USA Thanyawee Puthanakit, Thailand Laura Waters, United Kingdom Elizabeth Bukusi, Kenya Caroline Sabin, United Kingdom Ines Dourado, Brazil Sybil Hosek, USA LaRon E Nelson, USA Valdiléa Gonçalves Veloso, Brazil Felicita Hikuam, Namibia Michel Kazatchkine, Switzerland Morten Ussing, Switzerland Geoff Garnett, USA Barbara Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer, Germany Tobias Oliveira Weismantel, Germany Elizabeth Atieno Onyango, Kenya Track Committees Track A – Basic Science Co-lead Asier Sáez-Cirión, France Susana Valente, USA Members Fernando Valiente-Echeverria, Chile Maria Salgado Bernal, Spain Priti Kumar, USA Ulrike Protzer, Germany Zhiwei Chen, Hong Kong Track B – Clinical Science Co-lead Thanyawee Puthanakit, Thailand Laura Waters, United Kingdom Members Allison Agwu, USA Christoph Boesecke, Germany Elena Vovc, Switzerland Johannes Bogner, Germany N Kumarasamy, India Sanjay Bhagani, United Kingdom Track C – Epidemiology and prevention science Co-lead Elizabeth Bukusi, Kenya Caroline Sabin, United Kingdom Members Andrey Poshtaruk, Türkiye Ishwar Gilada, India KawangoAgot, Kenya Michael Traeger, Australia Viviane Dias Lima, Canada Track D – Social and behavioural sciences Co-lead Ines Dourado, Brazil Sybil Hosek, USA Members Heidi van Rooyen, South Africa Kane Race, Australia Laio Magno, Brazil Lisa Hightow-Weidman, USA Saiqa Mullick, South Africa Track E – Implementation science, economics, systems and synergies Co-lead LaRon E Nelson, USA Valdiléa Gonçalves Veloso, Brazil Members Fabio Mesquita, Brazil Kimberly Green, Vietnam Maryam Shahmanesh, United Kingdom Micheal Ighodaro, USA Nathan Ford, Switzerland Track F – Political research, law, policy and human rights Co-lead Felicita Hikuam, Namibia Michel Kazatchkine, Switzerland Members Allan Maleche, Kenya Carolyn Gomes, Jamacia Lillian Mworeko, Uganda Mariam Jashi, Georgia Daouda Diouf, Senegal [aids2024.org](aids2024.org) Abstract book 2 Abstract submission Over 7200 abstracts were submitted to the 25th International AIDS Conference. The Organizing Committee (OC) is very grateful for all the abstract submissions received. While the OC found many very high-quality abstracts among the submissions, due to limitations in the conference programme, more abstracts were rejected than accepted – with an overall acceptance rate of 38%(which includes the late breaker abstracts) . All abstracts went through a blind peer-review process completed by over 830 abstract reviewers. These reviewers are international experts in the field of HIV, including members of the OC and track committees. Each abstract was reviewed by three to four reviewers. The abstracts were reviewed for the quality and original Statistics for abstracts ity of the work. Late-breaking abstract reviews included an additional assessment of the late-breaking nature of the research. All reviewers were instructed to abstain from scoring any abstract on which they were an author or co-author, hada financial or personal conflict of interest, or did not have the appropriate expertise to evaluate. Each abstract was scored numerically against five pre-determined criteria, which were equally weighted to get a final score. The final score ranged from one (the lowest) to six (the highest). Any abstracts that received less than two reviews or where there was a scoring discr

FAQs

How were conference abstracts reviewed for AIDS 2024?

All abstracts underwent a blind peer-review process completed by more than 830 abstract reviewers. Each abstract was reviewed by three to four reviewers and evaluated on five equally weighted criteria.

What were the submission and acceptance statistics for AIDS 2024 abstracts?

The book reports 7,260 total abstracts submitted and 2,772 total abstracts accepted. It also breaks down accepted items across regular, oral, poster exhibition, e-poster, and late-breaking categories.

What instructions governed reviewer scoring and conflicts of interest?

Reviewers were instructed to abstain from scoring any abstract where they were an author or co-author, had a financial or personal conflict of interest, or lacked appropriate expertise to evaluate.

Sep 17, 2026

Upload by Mary Man