AAPM-ACMP Ad-hoc Committee on Professional Medical Physics Issues - Final Report - April 18, 2003

Sep 4, 2026

Uploaded by Tawan

Final Report of the AAPM-ACMP Ad-hoc Committee on Professional Medical Physics Issues, dated April 18, 2003. The report frames professional aspects of clinical medical physics—such as reimbursement, compensation, liability, standards, education, and ethics—and argues for improved coordination between AAPM and ACMP. It presents consensus summary recommendations, including endorsement or enactment steps, creation of a joint standing committee, collaboration with sister societies, and development of joint initiatives like publications, symposia, liaison structures, and educational programs. An appendix records the committee’s original charge and discussion summary.

LanguageEnglish

CategoryResearch & Report

FormatPDF

Pages8

Reading Time20 min

AccessFree to download

Preface

Summary Recommendations of the Committee to the AAPM and ACMP

Recommended Actions

Appendix

I. Goal and Charge of Committee

II. Methodology

Final Report, AAPM-ACMPAd hoc Committee on Professional Issues, April 18, 2003 Final Report AAPM-ACMP Ad-hoc Committee on Professional Medical Physics Issues Committee Membership AAPM-Jerry D. Allison, Charles W. Coffey, III, Robert G. Gould, Kenneth R. Hogstrom (cochair), Martin S. Weinhous ACMP-Benjamin R. Archer, Michael G. Herman (co-chair), John L. Horton, Bhudatt R. Paliwal, Kenneth N. Vanek Consultants-Michael T. Gillin (AAPM Professional Council chair), Richard L. Morin (ACR Commission on Physics Chair) Preface The professional aspects of the clinical practice of medical physics are an integral component of the clinical activities of each practicing medical physicist. These aspects include but are not limited to reimbursement, compensation, liability , standards, public and professional education, and ethics. In order to increase the effort and focus on the professional aspects of the clinical practice of medical physics, the ACMP and the AAPM should develop mechanisms to improve synergy, increase efficacy, and reduce duplication of effort on professional activities. A cooperative, coordinated two-bodied (AAPM and ACMP) approach can provide a flexible and powerful advocacy that demonstrates the importance of the professional activities related to our practice and benefits medical physicists. The summary recommendations are presented on the following page. The committee feels that implementation of these recommendations accomplishes a significant first step toward improving communication, coordination, and cooperation of the ACMP and the AAPM and increasing the professional practice activities on behalf of medical physicists in clinical practice. The recommendations are followed by an appendix, which contains the original charge and a summary of discussions held by the committee. In considering the summary recommendations, it is important to recognize that all members of ACMP are AAPM members. Final Report, AAPM-ACMPAd hoc Committee on Professional Issues, April 18, 2003 Summary Recommendations of the Committee to the AAPM and ACMP The ad hoc committee reached consensus and recommends that the following be endorsed or enacted by the respective boards of the AAPM and ACMP. 1. Benefit of Coordinated Joint Effort-it is recognized that there is benefit in the AAPM and ACMP working jointly to ensure coordination of professional aspects of clinical practice. It is recommended that the boards of both organizations adopt this underlying principle. 2. Increased Coordination with Sister Societies-It is recognized that there is benefit in the AAPM and ACMP working closely with sister societies (ACR, ASTRO, etc.) in addressing medical physics clinical practice specific efforts. It is recommended that the boards of both organizations recognize this principle. 3. Recommended Actions-AAPM and ACMP should: • Establish a Joint AAPM-ACMP Committee on Professional Practice. 1. Its membership would consist of (a) Professional Council Chair and Vice Chair plus two at-large members from AAPM and (b) four members from ACMP. 2. This is a standing committee, making recommendations to Executive Committees of the AAPM and ACMP. 3. The charge of the Joint AAPM-ACMP Committee on Professional Practice is to make recommendations to the respective organizations that • coordinate short-term and long-term professional practice activities of both societies, • • encourage effective and efficient professional practice specific activities of both societies. 4. The committee is expected to meet no less than twice annually (e.g. ACMP and AAPM) • Develop a joint business model for a clinical medical physics journal (JACMP) . • Organize joint symposia to be held at meetings of AAPM, ACMP, ASTRO, etc. • Arrange adjacent booths at annual meetings of the AAPM and ACMP. • Coordinate summer schools and educational programs. (Appendix VI.1) . • Establish reciprocal liaisons to appropriate committees and su

FAQs

What is the main purpose of the AAPM-ACMP ad hoc committee’s final report?

To improve the synergism, efficiency, and efficacy of AAPM and ACMP efforts addressing professional medical physics issues, and to recommend coordinated professional practice actions.

What consensus recommendations does the committee make for AAPM and ACMP?

It recommends that both organizations endorse or enact principles for coordinated joint effort, increased coordination with sister societies, and concrete actions including establishing a joint standing committee.

What methodology did the committee use before delivering the final report?

It held three committee meetings in Chicago (including RSNA annual meeting dates) and supplemented them with numerous discussions within the leadership of AAPM and ACMP.

Sep 4, 2026

Uploaded by Tawan