[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-351667-105":53,"doc-detail-351667-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","working-group-for-building-footprints-purpose-and-executive-summary","Working Group for Building Footprints - Purpose and Executive Summary","","Working Group for Building Footprints outlines a business plan to define why the initiative should be undertaken, how to update and maintain a framework dataset, and how value is delivered to stakeholders. It identifies gaps in current building footprint data maintenance and proposes using the NC 911 Board Orthoimagery Program with AI deep-learning for feature extraction. The plan covers stakeholders, use cases, assumptions, implementation risks, and technical workflows for separating geometry from attribution.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/working-group-for-building-footprints-purpose-and-executive-summary/351667/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/working-group-for-building-footprints-purpose-and-executive-summary/351667.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Melati","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-17","2026-09-22",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What is the purpose of the Working Group for Building Footprints initiative?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"It explains why the initiative should be undertaken, how to update and maintain the framework dataset, and how to meet the needs of stakeholders through a realistic and feasible approach.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Why is the current maintenance plan for building footprint data considered insufficient?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"The document states that the current maintenance plan is lacking, motivating a more stable update source and improved processes.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What technical workflow approach is proposed for updating the dataset?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"The plan separates geometry from attribution and uses technical workflows to use output from earlier steps to update existing datasets, following the imagery cycle in subsequent years.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},351667,1791726923,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":76},962085570644,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","Working Group for Building Footprints  \nBen Shelton/Darrin Smith, -CGIA April 20, 2022  \nPURPOSE  \nThe business plan will:  \n• Outline WHY this initiative should be undertaken by  \n• Determine HOW to update and maintain this  \nframework dataset through a realistic and feasible  \n•  \ndetailing the value to the stakeholders involved  \napproach to meeting the needs of all stakeholders  \nCurrent maintenance plan for building footprint data is lacking  \n• NC 911 Board Orthoimagery Program as a stable source of  \nupdates using latest AI-Deep Learning models for feature extraction  \nEXECUTIVE SUMMARY  \n1. Purpose and sponsorship  \n2. Stakeholders  \n3. Use Case and Value  \n4. Joint responsibility level of effort  \n5. Assumptions  \n| Recovery and\u003Cbr>resiliency planning | Property Assets | Disaster Relief damage estimation and recovery assistance |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Fire risk, mitigation, and response | Election confidence | Tax assessment |\n| NextGen 911 completeness | NCDOT Project Planning | U.S. Census housing units validation |\n| Broadband Mapping | AddressNC completeness checks | Historic Preservation |\n\n\n| GICC | SMAC | DPS-Emergency Management |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| CGIA; NC Address | NC 911 Board; NG911 | NC Board of Elections |\n| Dept. of Insurance | Dept. of Administration | NC Forest Service |\n| NC Office of Recovery and Resiliency | FEMA DHS | OSBM |\n| NC 911 PSAPs | Private Sector | NCDOT |\n| NC DCR | NC Broadband Office | Local government |\n\nBUSINESS CASE AND PURPOSE  \n1. The driver for need  \na) Age  \nb) Requirements for existing state agency applications  \nc) Demonstrated use by significant state agencies and local government  \n2. Volume of information  \na) Mandates automation technology  \nb) How to manage change  \n3. Implementation risks  \na) Funding mechanism  \nb) Maintenance  \nc) Attribution  \nTECHNICAL ASPECTS  \n1. The separation between geometry and attribution  \n2. An automation approach concept  \n• will be further defined by collaborative, well planned, and detailed supporting workflows  \n3. Identifying a common set of use-case identified attributes  \n| Core Attribute |\n| --- |\n| Primary key |\n| Tax Parcel Identification Number |\n| Occupancy Type e.g., single family, multifamily, etc. |\n| HAZUS Building Construction Type i.e. Wood, Steel, Concrete, etc. |\n| Year the structure was built |\n| Heated Square Footage |\n| Number of Stories |\n| Imagery derived year |\n| Has structure been removed |\n| 911 Address |\n\nTECHNICAL WORKFLOWS  \n2. Using output from 1 to update existing dataset  \nIMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS  \n1. Technical requirements/Inputs  \na) High confidence (current high-resolution imagery, parcels, addresses)  \nb) Interim proof of concept (will validate the technical requirements and assumptions)  \n2. Workflows  \na) Initial update vs annual maintenance cycle(s)  \nb) Update will follow the imagery cycle in  \nsubsequent years  \nNEXT STEPS FOR GICCAND SMAC  \n1. Ownership identification  \n2. Decision points – Proof of Concept  \n3. Funding  \n4. Start of implementation  \nThank you!  \nBen Shelton  \n[ben.shelton@nc.gov](ben.shelton@nc.gov)  \nDarrin Smith  \n[darrin.smith@nc.gov](darrin.smith@nc.gov)","cbCaivEltRZDlujL","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivEltRZDlujL","pdf",1889412,9,"English","# Purpose\n## Executive Summary\n# Business Case and Purpose\n## Implementation Risks\n# Technical Aspects\n## Core Attributes\n# Technical Workflows\n# Implementation Requirements\n# Next Steps","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the Working Group for Building Footprints initiative?\",\"answer\":\"It explains why the initiative should be undertaken, how to update and maintain the framework dataset, and how to meet the needs of stakeholders through a realistic and feasible approach.\"},{\"question\":\"Why is the current maintenance plan for building footprint data considered insufficient?\",\"answer\":\"The document states that the current maintenance plan is lacking, motivating a more stable update source and improved processes.\"},{\"question\":\"What technical workflow approach is proposed for updating the dataset?\",\"answer\":\"The plan separates geometry from attribution and uses technical workflows to use output from earlier steps to update existing datasets, following the imagery cycle in subsequent years.\"}]","Working Group for Building Footprints - Purpose and Executive Summary | PDF",1790095199]