[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-177867-105":53,"doc-detail-177867-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","volume-2-evaluation-of-2021-critical-use-nominations-for-methyl-bromide-and-related-issues-interim-report","Volume 2 - Evaluation of 2021 Critical Use Nominations for Methyl Bromide and related issues - Interim Report","","Interim Report, Volume 2 of the 2021 Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) under the Montreal Protocol evaluates 2021 Critical Use Nominations (CUNs) for methyl bromide and related issues. The report presents the scope and mandate, assesses fulfilment of Decision IX/6, and explains accounting frameworks for critical use. It analyzes trends in methyl bromide use for critical-use exemptions since 2005 and addresses disclosure of interest and nomination-related considerations.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/volume-2-evaluation-of-2021-critical-use-nominations-for-methyl-bromide-and-related-issues-interim-report/177867/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/volume-2-evaluation-of-2021-critical-use-nominations-for-methyl-bromide-and-related-issues-interim-report/177867.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Chumphorn","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-19","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What does Volume 2 of the 2021 TEAP report cover?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"Volume 2 provides an interim evaluation of 2021 critical use nominations for methyl bromide and related issues under the Montreal Protocol.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Which decisions and frameworks are discussed for methyl bromide critical use nominations?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"The report includes fulfilment of Decision IX/6 and presents accounting frameworks for critical use.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Does the report analyze how methyl bromide use has changed over time?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"Yes. It reviews trends in methyl bromide use for critical-use exemptions since 2005 and discusses disclosure of interest related to nominations.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},177867,1791722579,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":45},2336475401981,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000c94efd8d5204d?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786935347598174694","MONTREAL PROTOCOL\u000b\u000bON SUBSTANCES THAT DEPLETE\u000b\u000bTHE OZONE LAYER\nReport of the\u000bTechnology and Economic Assessment Panel\nMay 2021\nVolume 2: Evaluation of 2021 Critical Use Nominations for Methyl Bromide and Related Issues\nInterim Report\n\u000f\nMontreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer\nUnited Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)\nReport of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel\nMay 2021\nVolume 2: Evaluation of 2021 Critical Use Nominations for\nMethyl Bromide and related issues\nThe text of this report is composed in Times New Roman.\nCo-ordination:\tMethyl Bromide Technical Options Committee\nComposition of the report:\tCo-chairs: Ian Porter, Marta Pizano\nReproduction:\tOzone Secretariat Nairobi\nDate:\tMay 2021\nUnder certain conditions, printed copies of this report are available from:\nUnited Nations Environment Programme\nOzone Secretariat\nP.O. Box 30552\nNairobi, Kenya\nThis document is also available in portable document format from:\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \"https://ozone.unep.org/science/assessment/teap\" \u0014https://ozone.unep.org/science/assessment/teap\u0015\nNo copyright involved.  This publication may be freely copied, abstracted and cited, with acknowledgement of the source of the material.\nISBN: 978-9966-076-87-8\nDisclaimer\nThe United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) Co-Chairs and members, and the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee (MBTOC) Co-Chairs and members, and the companies and organisations that employ them do not endorse the performance, worker safety, or environmental acceptability of any of the technical options discussed.  Every industrial operation requires consideration of worker safety and proper disposal of contaminants and waste products.  Moreover, as work continues - including additional toxicity evaluation - more information on health, environmental and safety effects of alternatives and replacements will become available for use in selecting among the options discussed in this document.\nUNEP, TEAP Co-Chairs and members, and the MBTOC Co-Chairs and members, in furnishing or distributing this information, do not make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or utility; nor do they assume any liability of any kind whatsoever resulting from the use or reliance upon any information, material, or procedure contained herein, including but not limited to any claims regarding health, safety, environmental effect or fate, efficacy, or performance, made by the source of information.\nMention of any company, association, or product in this document is for information purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation of any such company, association, or product, either express or implied by UNEP, TEAP Co-Chairs and members, and the MBTOC Co-Chairs and members or the companies or organisations that employ them.\nAcknowledgement\nThe Technology and Economic Assessment Panel and its Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee acknowledge with thanks the outstanding contributions from all of the individuals and organisations who provided support to Panel and Committee Co-Chairs and members. The opinions expressed are those of the Panel and the Committee and do not reflect the reviews of any sponsoring or supporting organisation.\n\u000f\nForeword\nThe 2021 TEAP Report\nThe 2021 TEAP Report consists of 4 volumes:\nVolume 1: Technology and Economic Assessment Panel 2021 progress report\nVolume 2: Evaluation of 2021 critical-use nominations for methyl bromide – interim report\nVolume 3: Decision XXXI/3 task force report on unexpected emissions of trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11)\nVolume 4: Decision XXXI/7 task force report on continued provision of information on energy-efficient and low-global-warming-potential technologies\nThis is Volume 2.\nThe Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP):\nThe Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee:\nMBTOC Co-Chairs: Marta Pizano (Colombia); Ian Porter (Australia).\nMBTOC Members:","cbCaih1Q8FrvA7vb","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaih1Q8FrvA7vb","docx",1460764,59,"English","# Executive Summary\n# Scope of the Report\n# Critical Use Nominations for Methyl Bromide\n## Mandate\n## Fulfilment of Decision IX/6\n## Accounting Frameworks for Critical Use\n## Trends in Methyl Bromide Use for CUEs since 2005\n## Disclosure of Interest","[{\"question\":\"What does Volume 2 of the 2021 TEAP report cover?\",\"answer\":\"Volume 2 provides an interim evaluation of 2021 critical use nominations for methyl bromide and related issues under the Montreal Protocol.\"},{\"question\":\"Which decisions and frameworks are discussed for methyl bromide critical use nominations?\",\"answer\":\"The report includes fulfilment of Decision IX/6 and presents accounting frameworks for critical use.\"},{\"question\":\"Does the report analyze how methyl bromide use has changed over time?\",\"answer\":\"Yes. It reviews trends in methyl bromide use for critical-use exemptions since 2005 and discusses disclosure of interest related to nominations.\"}]","Volume 2 - Evaluation of 2021 Critical Use Nominations for Methyl Bromide and related issues - Interim Report | DOCX",1788329436]