[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-572040-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":81,"doc-detail-572040-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","union-opponents-woo-miner-vote-grant-funds-misused","Union Opponents Woo Miner Vote - Grant Funds Misused","","This document is a local newspaper clipping dated Wednesday, October 20, 1982, from Prestonsburg, Kentucky, reporting on union and political activity alongside county government accountability. It states that an auditor found misuse of juvenile-offender grant funds, requiring more than half of the money to be repaid, and details specific payroll payments and disputed findings. It also lists court-related items such as marriage licenses and filed suits, and includes separate coverage about officials’ vehicle use and other community and legislative remarks.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/","General",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/union-opponents-woo-miner-vote-grant-funds-misused/572040/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/union-opponents-woo-miner-vote-grant-funds-misused/572040.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Fahsai","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-10-13",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What did the state auditor find regarding the juvenile offender grant funds?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The auditor reported that more than half of the grant money intended to help juvenile offenders was misused and would have to be repaid to the state.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How were the county employees’ payments described in the finding?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The text says an employee paid $1,200 for “extra work” over three months in 1981 and another worker was assigned juvenile support staff work with an additional salary, with the auditor indicating the normal work hours matched the jobs.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What court-related items are listed in the clipping?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The clipping includes a section for “MARRIAGE LICENSES” with names and places, and a “SUITS FILED” list naming parties involved in separate lawsuits.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},572040,1792093883,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,89,94,99,104,109,114,119,124],{"id":85,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":86,"show_sort_weight":87,"slug":88},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":90,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":91,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":95,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":100,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":105,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":110,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":115,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":120,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":122,"slug":123},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":125,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":126},158,"general-158",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":128},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":129,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":22,"category_id":125,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":107,"language":136,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":140,"read_time":115},549768702563,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/8000c4aa63b76e948b?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786536092046926083","316  \n# @he jflmyì Cmunty @intes\n\nUSPS-2027-0000  \nSpeaking of  \nVolume LV  \n259  \nand for  \nNo.42  \nFloyd County  \nWEDNESDAY,OCTOBER 20,1982  \nPRESTONSBURG,  \nKENTUCKY 41653  \nRead Each Week by More Than 11,000 Families.  \n# Union OpponentsWoo Miner Vote\n\nGrant Funds Misused,  \n●Says State Auditor  \nMore than half of a grant that wassupposed to help juvenile offenders willhave to be paid back to the statebecause it was misused,according toan auditor's finding disclosed at lastweek's meeting of the Floyd fiscalcourt.  \nOne employee who was earning $1461a month as county finance officer waspaid $1200 for“extra work”over athree-month period in 1981,it was said.Another worker earning $883 a monthas a secretary in the county judge's of-fice was named juvenile support staffworker as well,for an additional$8B2 amonth  \nCourt House Happenings  \nMARRIAGE LICENSES  \nUnder the last county administra-tion,$26,600—most of it channeledthrough the state from the federal LawEnforcement Assistance Administra-tion—was earmarked to provide sup-port staff for juvenile court here fromJuly,1980 to June,1982.The idea wastorefer young offenders to various help-ing agencies rather than haul thembefore the court and stigmatize themas delinquents.  \nRandall Johnson,25,and Sheila KayDempsey,17,both of Prestonsburg;Earl Lee Hall,20,and CatherineMcKinney,18,both of Printer;Jay DeeSpears,28,and Linda Lee Garrett,22,both of Auxier;FloydF.Cox,76,of Ap-palachia,Va.,and Dollie Branham,64,of Martin;John Huff,22,of Drift,andCatherine Jean Robinson,19,of Albion,Mich.;Joe Hamilton,19,of Grethel,and Teresa Lynn Carter,18,ofPikeville;Connie Dean James,21,ofMeCombs,and Mary Jane Burchett,  \nIn each case,the two jobs for which  \nthe employees were paid were done  \nwith the same normal work hours,the  \nauditor said.  \nThe $1200 lump sum payment charg-ed against the first year of the grantand the whole $13,300 awarded in thesecond year should be returned to thestate,according to the auditor,although the county may dispute theauditor's findings within 30 days.  \nIn fact,a good part of the money  \nwent to pay two workers who were  \nalready on the county payroll—a viola-  \n20,of Endicott;Kirk Wade Blevins,23,of Langley,and Virginia Kay Pitts,23,of David;Randy Dewayne Wright,15,and Dolly Sue Bradley,16,both of Mar-tin;Darrell Dean Allen,27,andDeborah Faye Marsillett,25,both ofPrestonsburg;Rudy Albert Penn-ington,21,of Prestonsburg,and Dian-na Hackworth,19,of Salyersville.  \nGrace Damron was later identifiedas the employee who was paid the lumpsum,while Janet Tackett received theadditional salary as juvenile worker.Mrs.Damron said this week the pay-ment she received was for typing upjuvenile reports at home,after herregular working hours.Mrs.Tackettdechined to discuss the duties she wasassigned as juvenile support officer.  \ntion of the terms of the grant,the  \nauditor said.              \nOfficials Drive  \nOwn Vehicles  \nSUITS FILED  \nCounty Personnel Officer Thomas J.Lafferty,Jr.said that,as a result of themisuse of the grant,the county has loststate funding for its juvenile supportofficer.\"Now I'm going to have to goback to Frankfort like a dog with itstail between its legs to try to get thegrant back,\"he said.  \n## But Pay High\n\nJohn C.Wells vs.Chas.Howell et al,Edward Slone et al,and James Rose etal(separate suits);Central Supply Co.vs.D.and R.Coal Co.et al;Huey GrayAuto Sales vs.CarlT.Patton,Jr.;Cen-tral Supply Co.vs.Gala Enterprises etal;City of Prestonsburg vs.First Com-monwealth Bank;First Com-monwealth Bank vs.Winston Ford Co.  \n\"THE WORKING MAN and Labor\"being the theme of this year's  \nJust in case anyone gets the wrongidea,the Judge-Executive's 1983Chrysler New Yorker and themagistrates'pew pickups are theirprivate vehicles and were paid for outof their own pockets,Judge-ExecutiveJerry Lafferty,Jr.was anxious tomake clear last week.  \nRed,White and Blue Day parade,UMW president Sam Church,Jr.was an appropriate grand marshal.The burly union leader was in  \ntown fo","cbCaivnFI64Mywmi","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivnFI64Mywmi","pdf",44872601,"English","# Grant funds misuse and auditor findings\n## County finance officer and juvenile support staff payments\n## Court House happenings: marriage licenses and suits filed\n# Officials drive own vehicles and community/political notes\n## Red, White and Blue Day and UMW campaign appearances\n# Legislative and other commentary\n## Weight law discussion and related context","[{\"question\":\"What did the state auditor find regarding the juvenile offender grant funds?\",\"answer\":\"The auditor reported that more than half of the grant money intended to help juvenile offenders was misused and would have to be repaid to the state.\"},{\"question\":\"How were the county employees’ payments described in the finding?\",\"answer\":\"The text says an employee paid $1,200 for “extra work” over three months in 1981 and another worker was assigned juvenile support staff work with an additional salary, with the auditor indicating the normal work hours matched the jobs.\"},{\"question\":\"What court-related items are listed in the clipping?\",\"answer\":\"The clipping includes a section for “MARRIAGE LICENSES” with names and places, and a “SUITS FILED” list naming parties involved in separate lawsuits.\"}]","Union Opponents Woo Miner Vote - Grant Funds Misused | PDF",1791925175]