[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-277219-105":53,"doc-detail-277219-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","uclas-bi-monthly-report-july-and-august-2014","UCLAS Bi-monthly Report - July and August 2014","","Bimonthly updates summarize activities and governance actions within the UC Libraries Advisory Structure (UCLAS) for July and August 2014. The report covers Council of University Librarians developments, including open access and public research access initiatives, plus proposals for strategic planning and assessment. It details Coordinating Committee approvals for new common knowledge groups, member transition processes, and meeting guidelines, along with items advanced for consent. Strategic Action Group 1 work is highlighted, including ongoing pilot evaluation, transformative publishing review, OA policy rollout coordination, and metadata and shared print-related policy discussions.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/uclas-bi-monthly-report-july-and-august-2014/277219/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/uclas-bi-monthly-report-july-and-august-2014/277219.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Fahsai","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":15},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What is the document’s purpose for July and August 2014?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"It provides a bimonthly update on UCLAS activities for the July and August 2014 period.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What key CoUL activities are reported?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"CoUL signed public statements and letters supporting open access and publicly funded research access, discussed consultant-led proposals for strategic planning and assessment, and worked on submitting an open access APC grant proposal.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which major actions did the Coordinating Committee approve or establish?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The CC approved two new Common Knowledge Groups, documented member replacement scenarios and checklists, drafted an agenda placement process with timelines, and established face-to-face meeting guidelines approved by CoUL.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},277219,1791722642,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":15,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":47,"language":135,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":136,"faqs":137,"seo_title":138,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":139,"read_time":73},549768702563,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/8000c4aa63b76e948b?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786536092046926083","Re: UC Libraries Advisory Structure Bimonthly Report  \nTo: UC Libraries Advisory Structure (for information)  \nUsers Council (via Jayne Dickson for information & distribution)  \nCoUL (for information)  \nLAUC (via Matt Conner for information & distribution)  \nFrom: Coordinating Committee, UC Libraries Advisory Structure (via Marlo Young, Communications Manager)  \nDate: 30 September 2014  \nThe following report provides a bimonthly update on UC Libraries Advisory Structure (UCLAS) activities for the period of July and August 2014.  \nCouncil of University Librarians (CoUL)  \n• CoUL on behalf of the UC Libraries signed the Global Coalition Access to Research, Science and Education Organizations Statement against the Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers restrictive licensing model. Details: [http://www.plos.org/global-coalition-of-access-to](http://www.plos.org/global-coalition-of-access-to)research-science-and-education-organizations-calls-on-stm-to-withdraw-new-model-licenses/  \n• CoUL individually, and as a group on behalf of the UC Libraries, signed the California Taxpayer Access to Publicly Funded Research Act (AB 609) Letter of Support.  \n• CoUL discussed with Katherine Kott (consultant) proposals for two projects: a) . Strategic Planning Part 2-to help CoUL develop a shared vision for future system-wide services; b) . UC Libraries Advisory Structure Assessment Project: to assess the new UCLAS structure which has been in existence for a year and create a benchmark; and to suggest a sustainable assessment program for UCLAS for future years.  \n• Mellon OA Gold APC Grant Proposal (UCD/CDL): \"Pay It Forward\" will investigate a sustainable model of open access article processing charges for large North American Research Institutions. This grant proposal will be submitted in September 2014. During July-August, there were discussions with campuses regarding their involvement in preparation for a grant proposal submission.  \nCoordinating Committee (CC)  \n• CC provided feedback to CoUL on a preliminary proposal to assess the UC Libraries Advisory Structure’s internal governance, workflows, and communications using an outside consultant, Katherine Kott, and obtained input from the SAGs and CLS. The finalized proposal will be shared with members of the advisory structure.  \n• CC approved two new Common Knowledge Groups (CKG), a Data Curation CKG and Project Management CKG.  \n• CC identified and documented a process for replacing advisory structure members when they retire or rotate off of their appointments. This documentation, UCLAS Membership Changes Scenarios & Checklist, was shared with the SAG and CLS chairs as well as the LAUC Executive Board.  \n• CC drafted documentation that standardizes a process and identifies a timetable of how the advisory structure’s CC, SAGs and CLS get an item placed on CoUL’s meeting agendas for discussion and consent.  \n• CC established UCLAS Guidelines for Face-to-Face Meetings that were approved by CoUL. These were disseminated with the SAGs, CLS, and Common Knowledge Groups (CKGs) .  \n• CC reviewed and forwarded the Shared Print RoadMap, which reports to SAG3, and suggested the document be placed on CoUL’s consent agenda.  \n• CC reviewed and forwarded the Open Access Fund Assessment, which is managed by the CLS, and suggested the documentation be placed on CoUL’s consent agenda.  \n• CC investigated the possibility of hosting the soon-to-be-launched UCLAS blog on a campus server long-term rather than a third party server.  \nStrategic Action Group 1: Scholarly Research & Communication (SAG1)  \n• SAG1 members continued working with Strategic Action Group 3’s Collection Licensing Subgroup (CLS) on the Knowledge Unlatched pilot. This program is now well underway, with materials being cataloged and made available. The pilot evaluation period will continue until the Spring of 2015. SAG1 had extensive discussion on the pilot review of the current year, and communicated with CLS on recom","cbCaiqN17yWzcANk","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqN17yWzcANk","pdf",105748,"English","# UCLAS Bimonthly Report (July-August 2014)\n## Council of University Librarians (CoUL)\n## Coordinating Committee (CC)\n## Strategic Action Group 1: Scholarly Research & Communication (SAG1)","[{\"question\":\"What is the document’s purpose for July and August 2014?\",\"answer\":\"It provides a bimonthly update on UCLAS activities for the July and August 2014 period.\"},{\"question\":\"What key CoUL activities are reported?\",\"answer\":\"CoUL signed public statements and letters supporting open access and publicly funded research access, discussed consultant-led proposals for strategic planning and assessment, and worked on submitting an open access APC grant proposal.\"},{\"question\":\"Which major actions did the Coordinating Committee approve or establish?\",\"answer\":\"The CC approved two new Common Knowledge Groups, documented member replacement scenarios and checklists, drafted an agenda placement process with timelines, and established face-to-face meeting guidelines approved by CoUL.\"}]","UCLAS Bi-monthly Report - July and August 2014 | PDF",1789498819]