[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-277852-105":53,"doc-detail-277852-en":119},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":112,"head_meta":114,"extra_data":116,"updated_unix":118},105,"en","thesis-for-submission-awarded-abstract","THESIS FOR SUBMISSION (Awarded) - Abstract","","An exploration of consultation models used by recently qualified advanced clinical practitioners and non-medical prescribers in practice. The study addresses how structured consultation frameworks guide patient assessment, rapport building, diagnosis, management planning, and shared decision-making, and why these models were historically developed for physicians rather than allied health professionals. Using qualitative grounded theory with seventeen participants, findings identify transition to autonomous practice and added scope of responsibility, informing teaching in higher education.",{"@graph":63,"@context":111},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":46,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/paper-templates/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/thesis-for-submission-awarded-abstract/277852/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/thesis-for-submission-awarded-abstract/277852.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Eden","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-07","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What is the key outcome reported by participants?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"Using consultation models facilitated participants’ transition to autonomous practice with additional responsibilities and an extended scope of practice.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":113,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":115,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":117,"site_id":56},277852,1790240160,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":120},{"doc_id":117,"user_id":121,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":122,"doc_module":9,"category_id":45,"category_name":46,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":123,"file_id":124,"file_url":125,"file_type":126,"file_size":127,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":128,"language":129,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":130,"faqs":131,"seo_title":132,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":133,"read_time":134},1374391974468,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","An exploration of consultation models used by recently qualified advanced clinical practitioners/non-medical prescribers in practice.  \nby  \nGillian Oakley  \nA thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Professional Doctorate at the University of Lancashire  \nJanuary 2026  \nRESEARCH STUDENT DECLARATION FORM  \nType of Award  Professional Doctorate in Health Sciences  \nSchool  School of Nursing and Midwifery   \n1. Concurrent registration for two or more academic awards  \nI declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution  \n2. Material submitted for another award  \nI declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work  \n3. Collaboration  \nWhere a candidate’s research programme is part of a collaborative project, the thesis must indicate in addition clearly the candidate’s individual contribution and the extent of the collaboration. Please state below:  \n  N/A   \n4. Use of a Proof-reader  \nThe following third party proof-reading service was used for this thesis Kathleen Lowe (University Support Services) in accordance with the Policy on Proofreading for Research Degree Programmes and the Research Element of Professional Doctorate Programmes.  \nA copy of the confirmatory statement of acceptance from that service has been lodged with the Academic Registry.  \nSignature of Candidate  \nPrint name: Gillian Oakley  \n_~~ ~~  \nAbstract  \nTitle: An exploration of consultation models used by recently qualified Advanced Clinical Practitioners / Non-medical Prescribers in practice.  \nBackground:  \nIn professional healthcare fields, such as nursing, there has been a notable evolution of advanced roles, including non-medical prescribing (NMP) and advanced clinical practice (ACP) . Within higher education institutions (HEIs), the curricula supporting these roles emphasise theoretical foundations related to conducting comprehensive patient assessments, with the primary aim of ensuring patient safety. Consultation models in healthcare refer to structured frameworks or approaches that guide healthcare professionals through patient interactions. These models outline the process of conducting patient consultations, ensuring that key elements, such as gathering information, building rapport, diagnosing conditions, formulating management plans, and engaging in shared decision-making, are systematically addressed.  \nHistorically, the instruction of theoretical concepts associated with the medical consultation was primarily tailored to medical students prior to the establishment of advanced practice courses. Consequently, consultation models traditionally developed and utilised were created with physicians as the intended users, rather than nurses or other allied health professionals. This raises critical questions about the extent to which these models can be effectively adapted and applied to non-medical practitioners and advanced clinical practitioners practice, proposing an area of scholarly investigation.  \nAim:  \nTo explore the experiences of newly qualified non-medical prescribers and advanced clinical practitioners in utilising consultation model theory, within the clinical environment.  \nMethods:  \nThis study employed a qualitative research design informed by the principles of grounded theory. Seventeen participants from diverse healthcare settings were included, all of whom had recently completed non-medical prescribing or advanced practice courses and were actively engaged in patient assessment and diagnosis within clinical environments. Data collection occurred in two phases: phase one involved gathering data through free-writing contributions, followed by phase two, which consisted of semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was conducted iteratively, with ongoing ana","cbCaihcSKZUcadpR","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihcSKZUcadpR","pdf",2873178,282,"English","# Abstract\n## Background\n## Aim\n## Methods\n## Findings\n## Conclusions\n# Contents\n## Chapter 1: Study Introduction\n### Prologue\n### 1.0 Introduction","[{\"question\":\"What is the key outcome reported by participants?\",\"answer\":\"Using consultation models facilitated participants’ transition to autonomous practice with additional responsibilities and an extended scope of practice.\"}]","THESIS FOR SUBMISSION (Awarded) - Abstract | PDF",1789504691,99]