[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-277585-105":53,"doc-detail-277585-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","testimony-of-major-tyler-stevenson-maine-state-police","Testimony of Major Tyler Stevenson - Maine State Police","","Testimony of Major Tyler Stevenson, Maine State Police, provides opposition to LD 2150, an act proposing stricter procedures restricting access to state property, services, and communications through state entities. The statement argues against limiting no-trespassing orders to 90 days and against requiring Capitol Police to seek a Protection from Harassment Order to extend beyond that period. It explains existing no-trespassing practices, cites a Maine Supreme Court standard, and highlights concerns about court representation and legal fit of the harassment process.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/testimony-of-major-tyler-stevenson-maine-state-police/277585/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/testimony-of-major-tyler-stevenson-maine-state-police/277585.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Sarah ","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":8},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What is LD 2150 proposing according to the testimony?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"It seeks to restrict a person's access to state property and requires that a 90-day no-trespassing order include the reason for issuance. If restrictions need to extend beyond 90 days, the State Police would petition for a Protection from Harassment Order.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How does the testimony describe the current no-trespassing process used by Capitol Police?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Capitol Police investigate complaints, determine whether the individual has a right to be on the property, and assess whether conduct justifies an order. When warranted, the order is provided in writing, includes a contact phone number for state services, and is effective for one year.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What concerns are raised about using a Protection from Harassment Order for extensions?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The testimony highlights procedural issues such as who would represent the State Police in court, whether the State Police could serve as plaintiff for threatened individuals, and whether the process fits all situations where a no-trespassing order may be appropriate.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},277585,1790474057,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":8,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":73,"language":135,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":136,"faqs":137,"seo_title":138,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":139,"read_time":9},962085320529,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","# Z姐epartment of 9ublt多afetpMAINE STATE POLICE\n\n45 Commerce Drive -Suite 1Augusta,Maine 04333  \nJanet T.Mills  \nWilliam Ross  \nGovernor  \nColonel  \nMichael J.Sauschuck  \nLTC.Brian P.Scott  \nComnissioner  \nDeputy Chief  \n# Testimony of Major Tyler StevensonMaine State Police\n\nIn Opposition of (2150)  \nAn Act to Establish Procedures for Restricting Access to State Property,Access to State Services and Communicationwith or Through State Entities.  \nSponsored by Senator GrohoskiCommittee on Judiciary  \nSenator Carney,Representative Kuhn,and honorable members of the Committee on Judiciary:  \nMy name is Major Tyler Stevenson,and I am providing testimony on behalf of the Maine State Police and theMaine Department of Public Safety in opposition to LD 2150 as written,\"An Act to Establish Procedures for RestrictingAccess to State Property,Access to State Services,and Communication with or Through State Entities.\"  \nThis bill seeks to prohibit a state entity from issuing a no-trespassing order that restricts a person's access tostate property for more than go days and would require that any 9o-day trespass order includes the reason for itsissuance.If it is determined that the restriction should extend beyond go days,the bill would require the State Policeto petition a District Court for a Protection from Harassment Order to prevent the person from entering stateproperty.  \nIn 2002,in State of Maine v.Mark Anthony,the Maine Supreme Court established that the lawfulness of a no-trespassing order hinges on two factors:whether the premises are open to the public,and whether the order isjustified.Developed with this in mind,the current no-trespassing procedure used by the Capitol Police is to  \ninvestigate the complaint,determine whether the individual has a right to be on the property,and,if so,whether theirconduct justifies a no-trespassing order.When an order is warranted,it is provided in writing,and the individual isgiven a phone number to contact if state services are needed.The order is in effect for one year.If the individualbelieves the order is not warranted,they have the ability to file a complaint with Capitol Police leadership.Thisprocess is common practice among law enforcement agencies throughout the state and is an effective means ofstopping criminal behavior without resorting to criminal charges.We feel this approach appropriately balances therights of individuals to interact with their government and the rights of public employees to feel safe while providinga public service.  \nOver the past five years,the Capitol Police have issued 22 no-trespassing orders for state facilities.None of  \nthese orders required extension beyond the one-year period.During the same time frame,Capitol Police records show  \n# 组epartment of羽ubltc safetpМАIМЕ 5ТАТЕ РОШСЕ\n\n45 Commerce Drive -Suite 1Augusta,Maine 04333  \n.lanet Т. Mils  \nWilliam Ross  \nCovегпог  \nColonel  \nMichael J.Sauschuck  \nLTC.Brian P.Scott  \nCommissioner  \nDeputy Chief  \nthatfve arrests were made for trespassing afteran order wasviolated, most occurring wihin a few days o[thе огдегbeing issued.  \nThе primary focus ofouг оpposion t tnis bШis te requremen that tпе Бtаге РоНсе веека Ргогесйоп ЁготHarassment Order if it is deemed necessary to extend a no-trespassing order beyond go days.The Protection fromHarassment process has historically been initiated by an individual victim or a business,not by the State of Maine.Weforesee significant procedural concerns,including who would represent the State Police in court,whether the StatePolice could serve as the plaintiff on behalf of an individual who was threatened or harassed,or whether the StatePolice could act as the plaintiff on behalf of another state agency requesting a no-trespassing order.  \nWe also have concerns that a Protection from Harassment Order is not applicable in all situations where a no-trespassing order may be appropriate.Harassment is defined as“three or more acts of intimidation,confrontation,physical force,or the","cbCaieal7ypjz4aR","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaieal7ypjz4aR","pdf",140568,"English","# Testimony of Major Tyler Stevenson - Maine State Police\n## Opposition to LD 2150\n## Current no-trespassing procedures\n## Concerns about the Protection from Harassment Order","[{\"question\":\"What is LD 2150 proposing according to the testimony?\",\"answer\":\"It seeks to restrict a person's access to state property and requires that a 90-day no-trespassing order include the reason for issuance. If restrictions need to extend beyond 90 days, the State Police would petition for a Protection from Harassment Order.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the testimony describe the current no-trespassing process used by Capitol Police?\",\"answer\":\"Capitol Police investigate complaints, determine whether the individual has a right to be on the property, and assess whether conduct justifies an order. When warranted, the order is provided in writing, includes a contact phone number for state services, and is effective for one year.\"},{\"question\":\"What concerns are raised about using a Protection from Harassment Order for extensions?\",\"answer\":\"The testimony highlights procedural issues such as who would represent the State Police in court, whether the State Police could serve as plaintiff for threatened individuals, and whether the process fits all situations where a no-trespassing order may be appropriate.\"}]","Testimony of Major Tyler Stevenson - Maine State Police | PDF",1789502233]