[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-173388-en":3,"doc-seo-173388-105":29,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":90},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":11,"category_id":12,"category_name":13,"doc_title":14,"doc_description":15,"doc_content":16,"file_id":17,"file_url":18,"file_type":19,"file_size":20,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":11,"is_downloadable":11,"audit_status":11,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":15,"update_tm":28,"read_time":11},173388,1099523885336,"Taylor Morgan","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c",1,17,"Forms","TEMPLATE - Study Vetting and Selection Criteria","This template defines how new project and study opportunities are vetted and selected across a network of coordinating center, governing board, and clinic champion. It outlines decision pathways for advancing study opportunities through successive reviews toward grant development and onboarding. It also covers special “pass-through” studies with minimum scrutiny via an appropriateness check, and provides preliminary questions that assess whether the research is a study, is relevant to primary care practice, and fits the network’s mission and capacity. Additional industry partnership criteria are referenced.","TEMPLATE – Study Vetting and Selection Criteria\nSelection of new project and study opportunities must be guided by network and clinic priorities, feasibility in clinical settings, and relevance to patients and providers. Vetting occurs at multiple levels – network coordinating center, governing board, and clinic champion. Criteria may overlap at each level, and results in decisions whether to move the study opportunity to the next review and on to grant development and onboarding.\nThis template is closely aligned with the SOP – Developing a New Study with the Network Coordinating Center (pre-award) and must reflect the network principles and values (see TEMPLATE – Network Principles, Values, and Structure).\nPBRNs may occasionally receive study requests recruiting research sites (e.g., industry-sponsored studies). These “pass-through” studies may receive minimum scrutiny, but the coordinating center can conduct an “appropriateness check”. The process is described below. Additional criteria for industry-sponsored studies may be required and are available in CHECKLIST – Industry Partnership Criteria and Approval.\nProject and Study Selection Criteria\nNetwork Coordinating Center Criteria (initial consultation with the PI)\nAre the intended research topic and design relevant to and feasible within clinical settings?\nHow does the investigator think the clinics and coordinating center will be involved?\nWill clinics be compensated fairly?\nGoverning Board Criteria (governing board meeting)\nIs knowledge generated by the study relevant to primary care practice?\nDoes the study fit with the goals and objectives of the Network? For example:\nAdvances research and/or discovery\nIs feasible to implement, minimizes interference in clinical operations and burden to member practices\nStudy is collaborative and bidirectional\nWill contribute to improved patient health/quality\nIs the Network an appropriate place to answer this question?\nDo the investigator, Network Coordinating Center, and member practices have the resources and expertise to implement the study? (e.g., investigator's expertise, study budget etc.)\nIs there an appropriate rationale for the study intervention (e.g., evidence-based, theory, holds promise)\nClinic Champion Criteria (during clinic recruitment)\nIs an appropriately qualified individual interested and available to lead the study in each participating clinic?\nAre the necessary support staff available to support the study? Is there buy-in from providers and clinic leaders?\nWill this study unduly impact the clinic workflow?\nIs there a sufficient pool of patients meeting the inclusion criteria from which to recruit?\nIs the timeline realistic? Are there confounding factors that may impact the ability of the clinic to successfully implement this study?\nPass-Through Studies\nIf the research is being conducted by an organization of which the Network is a member (e.g. American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network), the NETWORK Coordinating Center may send communications to NETWORK member clinics and organizations at any time, without review and approval by the GOVERNING BOARD.\nFor all other projects, the GOVERNING BOARD must review and approve (via meeting or email) whether the opportunity should be sent to NETWORK members.\nPreliminary “appropriateness check” questions for consideration:\nIs this a research study?\nIs knowledge generated by the study relevant to primary care practice?\nIs the NETWORK an appropriate place to engage in this research?\nREFERENCED TEMPLATES AND TOOLS\nCHECKLIST – Industry Partnership Criteria and Approval\nSOP – Developing a New Study with the Network Coordinating Center (pre-award)\nTEMPLATE – Network Principles, Values, and Structure","cbCaiazr4fq23CI4","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiazr4fq23CI4","docx",28768,2,"English","en",105,"# Project and Study Selection Criteria\n## Network Coordinating Center Criteria (initial consultation with the PI)\n## Governing Board Criteria (governing board meeting)\n## Clinic Champion Criteria (during clinic recruitment)\n# Pass-Through Studies\n## Preliminary “appropriateness check” questions\n# Referenced Templates and Tools","[{\"question\":\"Which bodies conduct vetting for new study opportunities, and what decisions does vetting support?\",\"answer\":\"Vetting occurs at multiple levels: the network coordinating center, governing board, and clinic champion. The results determine whether the opportunity moves to the next review stage and onward to grant development and onboarding.\"},{\"question\":\"What criteria must the network coordinating center evaluate at the initial consultation with the PI?\",\"answer\":\"It assesses whether the research topic and design are relevant and feasible in clinical settings, how clinics and the coordinating center will be involved, and whether clinics will be compensated fairly.\"},{\"question\":\"How are “pass-through” studies handled when an external organization conducts the research?\",\"answer\":\"The coordinating center may communicate with network member clinics without governing board review for studies conducted by a network member organization. For other projects, the governing board must review and approve whether the opportunity is sent to network members, supported by an appropriateness check.\"}]","TEMPLATE - Study Vetting and Selection Criteria | DOCX",1788302902,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":14,"keywords":33,"description":15,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":85,"head_meta":87,"extra_data":89,"updated_unix":28},"template-study-vetting-and-selection-criteria","",{"@graph":35,"@context":84},[36,52,67],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,46,49],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":21},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",{"item":47,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":50,"name":14,"@type":42,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/template-study-vetting-and-selection-criteria/173388/",4,{"url":50,"name":14,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":14,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"inLanguage":23,"description":15,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":61,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":62,"interactionStatistic":63},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":40,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-09-05","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":64,"interactionType":65,"userInteractionCount":51},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":66},"ViewAction",{"@type":68,"mainEntity":69},"FAQPage",[70,76,80],{"name":71,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":73},"Which bodies conduct vetting for new study opportunities, and what decisions does vetting support?","Question",{"text":74,"@type":75},"Vetting occurs at multiple levels: the network coordinating center, governing board, and clinic champion. The results determine whether the opportunity moves to the next review stage and onward to grant development and onboarding.","Answer",{"name":77,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":78},"What criteria must the network coordinating center evaluate at the initial consultation with the PI?",{"text":79,"@type":75},"It assesses whether the research topic and design are relevant and feasible in clinical settings, how clinics and the coordinating center will be involved, and whether clinics will be compensated fairly.",{"name":81,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":82},"How are “pass-through” studies handled when an external organization conducts the research?",{"text":83,"@type":75},"The coordinating center may communicate with network member clinics without governing board review for studies conducted by a network member organization. For other projects, the governing board must review and approve whether the opportunity is sent to network members, supported by an appropriateness check.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":86,"og:title":14,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":15},"article",{"robots":88,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":91},[92,97,102,107,112,117,120,125,130],{"id":93,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":98,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":103,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":104,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":108,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":113,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":12,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":13,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},40,"forms",{"id":121,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":122,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":124},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":126,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":127,"show_sort_weight":128,"slug":129},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":131,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":132,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":133},158,"General","general-158"]