[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-245385-105":53,"doc-detail-245385-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","template-for-minutes-of-programme-examiners-meetings-confidential","Template for Minutes of Programme Examiners’ Meetings - Confidential","","University template for recording Minutes of Programme Examiners’ Meetings, setting out the minimum information required to support transparent decision-making on student awards and progression. Includes sections for meeting date, attendance details, apologies, documentation references, introductory discussions, confirmation of moderated module marks by external examiners, and application of classification or progression rules. Provides structured prompts to record decisions per candidate, special circumstances handling, annexes for signed recommended results, subsequent actions, prizes, and general external examiner comments.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/template-for-minutes-of-programme-examiners-meetings-confidential/245385/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/template-for-minutes-of-programme-examiners-meetings-confidential/245385.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Berry Peter","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What is the purpose of this minutes template for programme examiners’ meetings?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"It provides guidance on the minimum information that should be included in Minutes of Programme Examiners’ Meetings responsible for recommending awards and, when applicable, decisions on progression.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"What documentation references should be noted at the start of the minutes?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"The minutes should record the documentation available to the meeting, including relevant classification frameworks and conventions, mark lists, the Programme Examiners’ Special Cases Sub-Committee report, and candidates recommended for special consideration due to learning difficulties.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How should candidate decisions and recommended results be recorded and attached?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"Substantive discussion and the decision grounds should be recorded for each candidate where appropriate. Recommended results for all candidates must be captured on a signed spreadsheet/list by the Chair and examiners and attached as an annex to the minutes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},245385,1789228004,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":73,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":126,"read_time":9},1374402524268,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","Examinations Office  \nTemplate for Minutes of Programme Examiners’Meetings  \nIt is a University requirement that Minutes are kept of Programme Examiners’Meetings. The following template offers guidance on the minimum information which should be included in Minutes of Programme Examiners’Meetings which are responsible for recommending awards. The same template applies, with the deletion of references to External Examiners where they are not involved, to all Examiners’Meetings which take decisions on student progression or could result in the termination of a student’s programme.  \nThe Minutes of Programme Examiners’Meetings should reflect the process of the meeting and it is therefore recognised that the form of the Minutes will vary in accordance with the methodology used in determining results.  \nTemplate  \nTo be marked STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL  \n1. Date of meeting  \nAttendance, specifying the Chair, Secretary, Internal Examiners and External Examiners  \nApologies for absence  \n2. Note of documentation available to the meeting: including the University-wide Framework for the Classification of First Degrees (where appropriate), the relevant classification conventions, mark lists, the report of the Programme Examiners’Special Cases Sub-Committee, and a record of candidates who, on account of specific learning difficulties (e.g. dyslexia), have been recommended to receive special consideration in marking together with a note of those assessments in which the recommendation was applied.  \n3. Introductory comments and any preliminary general discussion: e.g. changes in procedures, special circumstances affecting specific papers.  \n4. Confirmation that module marks have been moderated and approved by the External Examiner(s) in respect of all candidates for whom an award is being decided.  \n5. A statement on how the relevant classification conventions (or progression rules, where appropriate) have been applied to the cohort under consideration.  \n6. A record of decisions in respect of candidates.  \nDecisions on recommended results for all candidates should be recorded on a spreadsheet/list signed by the Chair of the Examiners’Meeting and the Internal and External Examiners and should be attached to the Minutes as an Annex.  \nIn respect of each candidate, where appropriate, there should be recorded in the main body of the Minutes any substantive discussion of the individual candidate, the decision taken where there has been substantive discussion, and the grounds for the decision. In particular, the Minutes should note:  \n- consideration of borderline cases;  \n- candidates in respect of whom information on special circumstances had been submitted and had been considered by the Special Cases Sub-Committee, together with a note of the Special Cases Sub-Committee’s recommendation and the Examiners’ decision;  \n- consideration given to candidates for whom a fail was discussed;  \n- whether a viva was considered for the individual candidate;  \n- consideration given to any proposal for an aegrotat degree;  \n- a note of students who are in debt and for whom no recommendation will be formally submitted to the Faculty Examiners Meeting.  \nRecommendations that a candidate be deemed not to have sat or that a candidate be awarded an Aegrotat require specific consideration by the Faculty Examiners; any list of recommended results published following a Programme Examiners’Meeting should indicate that the result is not yet available in respect of such candidates.  \n7. A record that the list of recommended results was signed by the Chair of the Examiners’Meeting and the Internal and External Examiners.  \n8. A note ofany subsequent action to be taken, e.g. in respect of recommendations for combined Honours students.  \n9. A record of decisions on any prizes.  \n10. A record of any general comments made by External Examiners in respect of the assessment and awarding process.","cbCaic4mUeEh6jpe","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaic4mUeEh6jpe","pdf",117689,"English","# Template\n## Confidential handling\n## Minutes structure and required items","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of this minutes template for programme examiners’ meetings?\",\"answer\":\"It provides guidance on the minimum information that should be included in Minutes of Programme Examiners’ Meetings responsible for recommending awards and, when applicable, decisions on progression.\"},{\"question\":\"What documentation references should be noted at the start of the minutes?\",\"answer\":\"The minutes should record the documentation available to the meeting, including relevant classification frameworks and conventions, mark lists, the Programme Examiners’ Special Cases Sub-Committee report, and candidates recommended for special consideration due to learning difficulties.\"},{\"question\":\"How should candidate decisions and recommended results be recorded and attached?\",\"answer\":\"Substantive discussion and the decision grounds should be recorded for each candidate where appropriate. Recommended results for all candidates must be captured on a signed spreadsheet/list by the Chair and examiners and attached as an annex to the minutes.\"}]","Template for Minutes of Programme Examiners’ Meetings - Confidential | PDF"]