[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-168246-en":3,"doc-seo-168246-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":91},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":11,"category_id":12,"category_name":13,"doc_title":14,"doc_description":15,"doc_content":16,"file_id":17,"file_url":18,"file_type":19,"file_size":20,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":11,"is_downloadable":11,"audit_status":11,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":15,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},168246,2336474466412,"\tJames","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d",1,17,"Forms","Task 6 - Secondary species status for monkfish fishery","Assessment of secondary species in the UK monkfish fishery across the Celtic Sea and in ICES areas VIIb-k and VIII a,b,d. The study identifies main secondary species and evaluates the risk imposed by fishing pressure using PSA and risk analysis, including recoverability after removal. PSA scoring shows most secondary species at medium risk (2–3) across three gear types, with highest scores for skates and rays (cuckoo, blonde, undulate) and teleosts (ling, pollack) caught by gill nets. Management measures are reviewed and alternatives considered for highest-risk species.","Project UK Fisheries Improvement\nTask 6. Secondary species status for monkfish fishery, beam trawl, demersal trawl and tangle/trammel net\nAuthor(s): Ana Ribeiro Santos\nIssue Date: 23/06/2018\nCefas Document Control\nExecutive Summary\nIn 2017, Cefas was commissioned to contribute to the Seafish Project UK Fisheries Improvements PUKFI project. The project is led by Seafish and the MSC and aims to work towards an environmentally sustainable future for UK fisheries. It will do this through determining the environmental performance of key commercial fisheries, demonstrate how sustainability can be enhanced through Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs) and ultimately achieve MSC certification where possible.  Several fisheries were selected due to their importance for the UK market. One of which is the Western and Channel Monkfish beam trawl, demersal trawl, tangle/trammel and gillnets fisheries, in ICES areas VIIb-k, VIII a,b,d.\nThe objective of the study was to identify the main secondary species in the UK monkfish fishery in the Celtic Sea and assess the risk this fishery imposes on these species. The PSA and risk analysis indicates the species that are most at risk from fishing pressure, including their recoverability from removal through fishing.\nAccording to the PSA scores, most of the secondary species have medium risk (between 2 and 3) for all the three gears types. The species with highest of PSA scores (Medium risk) were the skates and rays species – cuckoo ray, blonde ray and undulate ray and teleosts species: ling and pollack, caught by gill netters.\nA review of management measures was carried out and possible alternative measures were discussed for the secondary species identified with the highest risks.\nTable of Contents\n\u0013 TOC \\o \"2-3\" \\h \\z \\t \"Heading 1,1\" \u0014\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658137\" \u00141\tIntroduction\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658137 \\h \u00144\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658138\" \u00141.1\tAims and scope of work\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658138 \\h \u00144\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658139\" \u00141.2\tBackground of fishery\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658139 \\h \u00144\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658140\" \u00142\tMaterial and methods\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658140 \\h \u00146\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658141\" \u00142.1\tData sources\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658141 \\h \u00146\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658142\" \u00142.2\tUnits of Assessment\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658142 \\h \u00146\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658143\" \u00142.2.1\tLandings\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658143 \\h \u00147\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658144\" \u00142.2.2\tDiscards estimates\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658144 \\h \u00147\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658145\" \u00142.3\tCatch profile\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658145 \\h \u00148\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658146\" \u00142.4\tProductivity and susceptibility Analysis - PSA\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658146 \\h \u00148\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658147\" \u00142.4.1\tProductivity\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658147 \\h \u00149\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658148\" \u00142.4.2\tSusceptibility\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658148 \\h \u001411\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658149\" \u00142.4.3\tInformation sources\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658149 \\h \u001413\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658150\" \u00143\tResults\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658150 \\h \u001413\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658151\" \u00143.1\tCatch profile\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658151 \\h \u001413\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658152\" \u00143.2\tProductivity scoring\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658152 \\h \u001417\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658153\" \u00143.3\tSusceptibility score\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658153 \\h \u001419\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658154\" \u00143.4\tPSA Risk Assessment\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658154 \\h \u001422\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658155\" \u00144\tReview of management measures\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658155 \\h \u001425\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658156\" \u00145\tData limitations for bycatch and rare species\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658156 \\h \u001428\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658157\" \u00146\tConclusions\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658157 \\h \u001428\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658158\" \u00147\tReferences\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658158 \\h \u001429\u0015\u0015\n\u0015\nTables\n\u0013 TOC \\h \\z \\c \"Table\" \u0014\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658159\" \u0014Table 1 Unit of Assessments\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518658159 \\h \u00147\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc518658160\" \u0014Table 2 Number of trips sampled for each gear type, between 2014 and 2017, in ICES areas VIIb-k.\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc518","cbCaihxWlS13CzvH","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihxWlS13CzvH","docx",2865078,41,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n## Aims and scope of work\n## Background of fishery\n# Material and methods\n## Data sources\n## Units of Assessment\n## Landings\n## Discards estimates\n## Catch profile\n## Productivity and susceptibility Analysis - PSA\n## Productivity\n## Susceptibility\n## Information sources\n# Results\n## Catch profile\n## Productivity scoring\n## Susceptibility score\n## PSA Risk Assessment\n# Review of management measures\n# Data limitations for bycatch and rare species\n# Conclusions\n# References","[{\"question\":\"What is the objective of this task for the monkfish fishery?\",\"answer\":\"To identify the main secondary species in the UK monkfish fishery and assess the risk that the fishery poses to those species, including recoverability after removal.\"},{\"question\":\"How is risk estimated in the study?\",\"answer\":\"Risk is evaluated using a PSA (Productivity and Susceptibility Analysis) and risk analysis framework, producing productivity and susceptibility scores and a final PSA risk assessment.\"},{\"question\":\"Which secondary species show the highest PSA risk scores and why are they notable?\",\"answer\":\"Skates and rays (cuckoo ray, blonde ray, undulate ray) and teleosts (ling and pollack) have the highest PSA scores, with ling and pollack highlighted as being caught by gill nets.\"}]","Task 6 - Secondary species status for monkfish fishery | DOCX",1788228005,14,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":14,"keywords":34,"description":15,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":86,"head_meta":88,"extra_data":90,"updated_unix":28},"task-6-secondary-species-status-for-monkfish-fishery","",{"@graph":36,"@context":85},[37,54,68],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,51],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":52,"name":14,"@type":43,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/task-6-secondary-species-status-for-monkfish-fishery/168246/",4,{"url":52,"name":14,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":14,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":23,"description":15,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":41,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71,77,81],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"What is the objective of this task for the monkfish fishery?","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"To identify the main secondary species in the UK monkfish fishery and assess the risk that the fishery poses to those species, including recoverability after removal.","Answer",{"name":78,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":79},"How is risk estimated in the study?",{"text":80,"@type":76},"Risk is evaluated using a PSA (Productivity and Susceptibility Analysis) and risk analysis framework, producing productivity and susceptibility scores and a final PSA risk assessment.",{"name":82,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":83},"Which secondary species show the highest PSA risk scores and why are they notable?",{"text":84,"@type":76},"Skates and rays (cuckoo ray, blonde ray, undulate ray) and teleosts (ling and pollack) have the highest PSA scores, with ling and pollack highlighted as being caught by gill nets.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":87,"og:title":14,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":15},"article",{"robots":89,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":92},[93,98,103,107,112,117,120,125,130],{"id":94,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":99,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":100,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":102},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":29,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":104,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":108,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":113,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":12,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":13,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},40,"forms",{"id":121,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":122,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":124},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":126,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":127,"show_sort_weight":128,"slug":129},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":131,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":132,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":133},158,"General","general-158"]