[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-169953-en":3,"doc-seo-169953-105":31,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":93},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":11,"category_id":12,"category_name":13,"doc_title":14,"doc_description":15,"doc_content":16,"file_id":17,"file_url":18,"file_type":19,"file_size":20,"view_count":21,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":11,"is_downloadable":11,"audit_status":11,"page_count":22,"language":23,"language_code":24,"site_id":25,"html_lang":24,"table_of_contents":26,"faqs":27,"seo_title":28,"seo_description":15,"update_tm":29,"read_time":30},169953,687197207639,"Asher","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd",1,158,"General","Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review - Starter Template - 3rd edn","A structured literature review starter template that maps a systematic review workflow from topic selection to report production. It guides users through refining the review topic, formulating research questions using PICO, SPICE, or mixed-methods frameworks, and developing a protocol aligned with PRISMA-P. The template then supports setting eligibility criteria, designing search strategies with searchable logs, screening and selecting studies, extracting data with adaptable forms, and conducting quality appraisal using risk-of-bias tools. It concludes with synthesis, analysis planning, and dissemination considerations.","Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (3rd edn)\nA literature review starter template\nMay 2022 – version 1.0\nDeveloped by Andrew Booth for the Sage textbook Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review 3rd edn\n1School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR),\n2University of Sheffield, UK\nA literature review starter template\nPurpose of this template\nThis template aims to demonstrate the sections you will need to include within a successfully written review. You can download this template at the start of your project and fill in the different sections as you go, or you can download it when you are ready to write up your findings.\nStep 1: Topic selection and refinement\nTITLE\nABSTRACT\nINTRODUCTION\n\u003CNarrative review: Importance of Review Topic>\nStep 2: Research question (See Chapter 4)\nNow articulate the same question using a question formulation framework:\nGeneric Question Formulation Framework\nQuestion structure for your PICO (quantitative) question\nQuestion structure for a Qualitative (SPICE) question\nQuestion structure for a Mixed Methods (PerSPE©TiF) Question\nStep 3: Develop the Protocol (See Chapter 4)\nBest practice in systematic reviews requires following the \u0013 HYPERLINK \"http://www.prisma-statement.org/Extensions/Protocols\" \u0014PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses – Protocol) checklist\u0015.\nStep 4: Develop Eligibility criteria (See Chapter 4)\nMETHODS – Search (See Chapter 5)\nDO NOT PROCEED IF THE STUDY EXCLUDED FROM REVIEW\n\u003CNarrative synthesis: Justified inclusion and exclusion criteria>\nStep 5: Searching for evidence (See Chapter 5)\n\u003CNarrative review: Conduct of literature searches>\nSearch log\nTop Tip! It is possible to save your search strategy in most databases by creating a personal profile. This allows you to trial several search strategies before deciding on the most suitable iteration. Alternatively, cut and paste the strategy into your search log or, if necessary, screen capture the complete strategy so you can retype it accurately offline.\nStep 6: Screening and study selection (See Chapter 6)\n\u003CNarrative review: Selection of citations>\nStep 7: Data extraction (See Chapter 6)\nData collection form\nThis form is a guide for developing your own data extraction form. Sections can be expanded and added, and irrelevant sections can be removed. It is difficult to design a single form that meets the needs of all reviews, so it is important to consider carefully the information you need to collect and design your form accordingly. The information included on this form should be comprehensive and may be used in the text of your review, ‘Characteristics of included studies’ table, risk of bias assessment, and statistical analysis.\nNotes on using a data extraction form:\nBe consistent in the order and style you use to describe the information for each report.\nRecord any missing information as unclear or not described, to make it clear that the information was not found in the study report(s), not that you forgot to extract it.\nInclude any instructions and decision rules on the data collection form, or in an accompanying document. Practice using the form and give training to any other authors using the form.\nGeneral Information\n\u000fCharacteristics of included studies\nMethods\n\u000fParticipants\n\u000fIntervention groups\nCopy and paste table for each intervention and comparison group\nIntervention Group 1\nOutcomes\nCopy and paste the table for each outcome.\nOutcome 1\nOther\nQualitative considerations\n\u000f\nMETHODS – Appraisal (See Chapter 6)\nQuality assessment (including Risk of Bias assessment)\nQuality assessment is an important component of most systematic approaches to a literature review. For randomised controlled trials a formal risk of bias assessment is conducted. Select your appropriate quality assessment tool for the study types you have decided to include in your review:\nRisk of Bias Tool: See \u0013 HYPERLINK \"http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/cochrane/handbook/index.htm\" \\l \"chapter_8/8_asse","cbCaigptcMytCE9L","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigptcMytCE9L","docx",83588,3,38,"English","en",105,"# Purpose of this template\n# Step 1: Topic selection and refinement\n## Title\n## Abstract\n## Introduction\n# Step 2: Research question\n## Question formulation frameworks\n# Step 3: Develop the Protocol\n# Step 4: Develop Eligibility criteria\n# Step 5: Searching for evidence\n## Search log\n# Step 6: Screening and study selection\n# Step 7: Data extraction\n## Data collection form\n# Methods: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis\n# Results: Search, Appraisal, and Synthesis\n# Step 8: Quality assessment\n# Step 9: A knowledge synthesis\n# Step 10: Report production and dissemination","[{\"question\":\"What are the main steps covered by this literature review starter template?\",\"answer\":\"The template follows a full workflow: topic selection, research question formulation, protocol development, eligibility criteria, searching, screening, study selection, data extraction, quality appraisal, synthesis and analysis planning, then report production and dissemination.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the template help formulate research questions?\",\"answer\":\"It instructs users to express the same question using a question formulation framework, including structures for PICO (quantitative), SPICE (qualitative), and PerSPE©TiF (mixed methods) approaches.\"},{\"question\":\"What guidance is provided for protocol and quality assessment?\",\"answer\":\"Protocol development aligns with the PRISMA-P checklist, and quality assessment emphasizes selecting an appropriate quality tool, including risk of bias assessment for randomized trials, with references to the Cochrane Handbook.\"}]","Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review - Starter Template - 3rd edn | DOCX",1788265077,13,{"code":4,"msg":32,"data":33},"ok",{"site_id":25,"language":24,"slug":34,"title":14,"keywords":35,"description":15,"schema_data":36,"social_meta":88,"head_meta":90,"extra_data":92,"updated_unix":29},"systematic-approaches-to-a-successful-literature-review-starter-template-3rd-edn","",{"@graph":37,"@context":87},[38,54,70],{"@type":39,"itemListElement":40},"BreadcrumbList",[41,45,49,51],{"item":42,"name":43,"@type":44,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":46,"name":47,"@type":44,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":44,"position":21},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/",{"item":52,"name":14,"@type":44,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/systematic-approaches-to-a-successful-literature-review-starter-template-3rd-edn/169953/",4,{"url":52,"name":14,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":14,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":24,"description":15,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":63,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":64,"interactionStatistic":65},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":42,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-09-05","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":66,"interactionType":67,"userInteractionCount":69},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":68},"ViewAction",5,{"@type":71,"mainEntity":72},"FAQPage",[73,79,83],{"name":74,"@type":75,"acceptedAnswer":76},"What are the main steps covered by this literature review starter template?","Question",{"text":77,"@type":78},"The template follows a full workflow: topic selection, research question formulation, protocol development, eligibility criteria, searching, screening, study selection, data extraction, quality appraisal, synthesis and analysis planning, then report production and dissemination.","Answer",{"name":80,"@type":75,"acceptedAnswer":81},"How does the template help formulate research questions?",{"text":82,"@type":78},"It instructs users to express the same question using a question formulation framework, including structures for PICO (quantitative), SPICE (qualitative), and PerSPE©TiF (mixed methods) approaches.",{"name":84,"@type":75,"acceptedAnswer":85},"What guidance is provided for protocol and quality assessment?",{"text":86,"@type":78},"Protocol development aligns with the PRISMA-P checklist, and quality assessment emphasizes selecting an appropriate quality tool, including risk of bias assessment for randomized trials, with references to the Cochrane Handbook.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":89,"og:title":14,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":15},"article",{"robots":91,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":25},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":94},[95,100,105,110,115,120,125,130,134],{"id":96,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":101,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":106,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":111,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":116,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":121,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":122,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":124},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":126,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":127,"show_sort_weight":128,"slug":129},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":131,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":132,"show_sort_weight":69,"slug":133},21,"Paper Templates","papers-templates",{"id":12,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":13,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":135},"general-158"]