[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-167987-en":3,"doc-seo-167987-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":90},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":11,"category_id":12,"category_name":13,"doc_title":14,"doc_description":15,"doc_content":16,"file_id":17,"file_url":18,"file_type":19,"file_size":20,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":11,"is_downloadable":11,"audit_status":11,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":15,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},167987,2336475104042,"Tawan","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000c4c32af1715be0?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786537525561427321",1,21,"Paper Templates","Supplementary Material - Tables S1-S3 and Figures S1-S3","Supplementary material reporting equipment setup details and statistical and visual analyses across training conditions. Table S1 documents the equipment used and device connections; Tables S2 and S3 quantify changes in median mean f0 and call duration across baseline, after 30 days, and after 60 days, plus follow-up conditions when the low-pass criterion is deactivated and templates become unshifted. Figure S1 visualizes spectrograms and pitch shifting per bat, Figure S2 summarizes success-rate changes under low-pass filter settings, and Figure S3 evaluates correlations between mean f0 and call duration.","Supplementary material\nTable S1: Equipment details of the setup. The table presents the equipment used in the training and data acquisition setup, details the product information, and indicates the connections between the devices.\nTable S2: Change in the median of the mean f0. The mean f0 represents an average of the f0 over the time course of each individual call. The table shows the comparison of the five data sets: ‘baseline’ (i.e. before the activation of the low-pass criterion and presentation of frequency-shifted templates), ‘after 30 days’ and ‘after 60 days’ of training, with the low-pass ‘criterion deactivated’, and presentation of ‘unshifted templates’. The difference between the data sets was tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For all data sets we report the number of analysed calls, median, interquartile ranges, and p-values.\n*** = p-value \u003C 0.0001; N = number of analysed calls  (this excludes calls \u003C 5 ms for Bats 1-5 and calls \u003C 25 ms for Bat 6); IQR = interquartile range in kHz; diff. medians = difference between the medians of the two compared data sets (in kHz and %); ‘base line’ = data from 5 days before the activation of the low-pass criterion and the pitch-shifted template; ‘after 30 days of training’ = data from training days 28-32; ‘after 60 days of training’ = data from training days 58-62; ‘criterion deactivated’ = data from recording days 1-5 after the low-pass criterion was deactivated, but the template was still pitch-shifted; ‘unshifted template’ = data from recording days 6-10 after the low-pass criterion was deactivated, the template was not pitch-shifted anymore.\nTable S3: Change in median call duration. The table shows the comparison of the five data sets: ‘baseline’ (i.e. before the activation of the low-pass criterion and presentation of frequency-shifted templates), ‘after 30 days’ and ‘after 60 days’ of training, with the low-pass ‘criterion deactivated’, and presentation of ‘unshifted templates’. The difference between the data sets was tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For all data sets we report the number of analysed calls, median, interquartile ranges, and p-values.\n*** = p-value \u003C 0.0001; N = number of analysed calls (this excludes calls \u003C 5 ms for Bats 1-5 and calls \u003C 25 ms for Bat 6); IQR = interquartile range in ms; diff. medians = difference between the medians of the two compared data sets (in ms and %); ‘base line’ = data from 5 days before the activation of the low-pass criterion and the pitch-shifted template; ‘after 30 days of training’ = data from training days 28-32; ‘after 60 days of training’ = data from training days 58-62; ‘criterion deactivated’ = data from recording days 1-5 after the low-pass criterion was deactivated, but the template was still pitch-shifted; ‘unshifted template’ = data from recording days 6-10 after the low-pass criterion was deactivated, the template was not pitch-shifted anymore.\nFigure S1: Spectrograms of the typical baseline calls and the corresponding pitch-shifted template for each bat. Top to bottom: Bats 1-6. The bats’ vocalisations all fall in the sinusoidally frequency modulated (SFM) syllable class described for this species (Lattenkamp et al., 2019). The playback calls (right column) are downward pitch shifted by four semi-tones from the original frequency range in which they were recorded (left column). Specifically, a frequency-shift of four semi-tones equals a 24% change of the mean fundamental frequency of the calls (e.g. a call with a natural fundamental frequency (f0) of 15 kHz would be downward pitch-shifted by 3.6 kHz to a new fundamental frequency of 11.4 kHz).\nFigure S2: Success rate in dependence of the individual low-pass filter settings. In the presented contingency training paradigm, the level of difficulty was adjusted depending on the individual success rate in the experiment. The success rate (indicated in green) is calculated as the percentage of feeder activations in respect to the total number of saved re","cbCaiokdeyeddlPh","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiokdeyeddlPh","docx",968188,7,"English","en",105,"# Table S1\n## Equipment details and setup connections\n# Table S2\n## Change in the median of the mean f0\n# Table S3\n## Change in the median call duration\n# Figure S1\n## Baseline spectrograms and pitch-shifted templates\n# Figure S2\n## Success rate under low-pass filter settings\n# Figure S3\n## Correlation of mean f0 and call duration","[{\"question\":\"What do Table S2 and Table S3 measure across the training conditions?\",\"answer\":\"Table S2 measures changes in the median of the mean f0, while Table S3 measures changes in the median call duration. Both compare baseline, after 30 days, after 60 days, and follow-up conditions with the low-pass criterion deactivated and unshifted templates.\"},{\"question\":\"How are the baseline and follow-up conditions defined in the tables?\",\"answer\":\"The baseline corresponds to data from 5 days before activation of the low-pass criterion and presentation of frequency-shifted templates. Follow-up conditions include recordings after deactivating the low-pass criterion, with templates still pitch-shifted for the criterion-deactivated period and not pitch-shifted for the unshifted template period.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the statistical significance reported for differences between data sets?\",\"answer\":\"Differences between data sets are tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The footnote indicates p-value thresholds (*** for p \\u003c 0.0001) and reports the number of analyzed calls, medians, interquartile ranges, and p-values.\"}]","Supplementary Material - Tables S1-S3 and Figures S1-S3 | DOCX",1788223072,3,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":14,"keywords":34,"description":15,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":85,"head_meta":87,"extra_data":89,"updated_unix":28},"supplementary-material-tables-s1-s3-and-figures-s1-s3","",{"@graph":36,"@context":84},[37,53,67],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,50],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":29},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/paper-templates/",{"item":51,"name":14,"@type":43,"position":52},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/supplementary-material-tables-s1-s3-and-figures-s1-s3/167987/",4,{"url":51,"name":14,"@type":54,"author":55,"headline":14,"publisher":57,"fileFormat":60,"inLanguage":23,"description":15,"dateModified":61,"datePublished":61,"encodingFormat":60,"isAccessibleForFree":62,"interactionStatistic":63},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":56},"Person",{"url":41,"name":58,"@type":59},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":64,"interactionType":65,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":66},"ViewAction",{"@type":68,"mainEntity":69},"FAQPage",[70,76,80],{"name":71,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":73},"What do Table S2 and Table S3 measure across the training conditions?","Question",{"text":74,"@type":75},"Table S2 measures changes in the median of the mean f0, while Table S3 measures changes in the median call duration. Both compare baseline, after 30 days, after 60 days, and follow-up conditions with the low-pass criterion deactivated and unshifted templates.","Answer",{"name":77,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":78},"How are the baseline and follow-up conditions defined in the tables?",{"text":79,"@type":75},"The baseline corresponds to data from 5 days before activation of the low-pass criterion and presentation of frequency-shifted templates. Follow-up conditions include recordings after deactivating the low-pass criterion, with templates still pitch-shifted for the criterion-deactivated period and not pitch-shifted for the unshifted template period.",{"name":81,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":82},"How is the statistical significance reported for differences between data sets?",{"text":83,"@type":75},"Differences between data sets are tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The footnote indicates p-value thresholds (*** for p \u003C 0.0001) and reports the number of analyzed calls, medians, interquartile ranges, and p-values.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":51,"og:type":86,"og:title":14,"og:site_name":58,"og:description":15},"article",{"robots":88,"canonical":51},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":91},[92,97,102,107,112,117,122,127,130],{"id":93,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":98,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":103,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":104,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":108,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":113,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":118,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":119,"show_sort_weight":120,"slug":121},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":123,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":125,"slug":126},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":12,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":13,"show_sort_weight":128,"slug":129},5,"papers-templates",{"id":131,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":132,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":133},158,"General","general-158"]