[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-167978-en":3,"doc-seo-167978-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":91},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":11,"category_id":12,"category_name":13,"doc_title":14,"doc_description":15,"doc_content":16,"file_id":17,"file_url":18,"file_type":19,"file_size":20,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":11,"is_downloadable":11,"audit_status":11,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":15,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},167978,962084931830,"Jacob","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd",1,18,"Letters","Superior Court of Washington - Marital Dissolution (Divorce) Case Brief - Snohomish County","Marital dissolution case for a divorce in Snohomish County, Washington, involving young spouses and their four-year-old daughter, Elsa. The brief centers on a parenting plan and competing allegations under Washington’s 191 factors, with the GAL recommending the husband be the custodial parent. It describes domestic violence concerns, substance-related issues, and detailed incidents including threats with knives and assault episodes, while also addressing each party’s claimed caregiving role and the child’s emotional bond and fear signals in relation to the wife.","Superior Court of Washington\nCounty of Snohomish\nI.  INTRODUCTION\nThis is a marital dissolution (divorce) involving young spouses and their four-year-old daughter, Elsa.  Husband is 25 years old; Wife is 22.  They married in May 2013 and separated in July 2015 (two-year marriage).  The parties have very little in the way of income, assets, or debts.  The main issue is the parenting plan for their four-year old.  As the Court will see, Wife is both deceitful and dangerous for the child.  The GAL recommends naming Husband the custodial parent.\nEach party alleges numerous “191 factors” (factors that endanger the child) against the other, such as domestic violence, drug abuse, and abusive use of conflict.  The GAL recommended no “191 factor” findings against Husband, but multiple findings against Wife.\nBoth parties claim a closer parent-child bond than the other spouse.  The GAL report indicates the child is closely bonded with Husband, and that the child is “relatively fearful . . . , tentative in her actions, as if waiting for a hammer to fall, when she is with [Wife].”\nLikewise, each party will presumably claim to have performed the majority of the parenting functions prior to their separation.  The GAL found Husband—the stay-at-home spouse—performed the majority of the parenting functions.  Moreover, the GAL report indicates Wife essentially conceded on this point during interviews.\nWith respect to Wife, the GAL report focuses on her untruthfulness, aggressiveness, inability to form bonds due to lack of empathy, and vindictive refusal to communicate with Husband on important parenting topics.\nII.  STATEMENT OF FACTS\nThe parties married May 2014 in California, where Wife’s family lives.  They initially lived with her family but were not happy there.  Her sister had punched a hole in a door when trying to hit Husband, and the rest of the family had histories of sorting their disputes with their fists as well.\nHusband brought his own imperfections to the marriage.  He suffered from a congenital right arm defect for which he has undergone several surgeries and was prescribed medical marijuana as pain relief.  Husband remained physically strong and active, but he had difficult-to-treat headaches.\nThe parties decided to move into a medical marijuana grow house in California shortly after Wife became pregnant.  It seemed like an ideal solution.  Husband could work there fulltime, receive discounted medicine, and eliminate most of their overhead.\nWhile living there, coworkers noticed Wife often hit Husband.  The grow house owner saw her “punch” Husband on multiple occasions.  Another time she threw a bowl at him and started yelling.  A mutual friend witnessed Wife slap Husband because his phone was dead.  According to the witnesses, Husband would try to calm her down and then apologize to the bystanders.\nIn late 2014—just before their daughter’s birth—the parties moved to Snohomish County, where they could be close to Husband’s family.  They thought life in Washington would be better for their daughter.\nWhen their daughter was about six months old, Husband began receiving partial SSID, and Wife said she could no longer “stand” being a stay-at-home parent.  The parties decided to reverse roles.  She found a fulltime waitress position.  And Husband quit his job to become a fulltime dad, only working part-time when the parties needed additional income, such as around Christmas.\nWife’s anger issues did not subside when she returned to work, and she threatened to commit suicide several times.  On approximately five occasions, she left the house at night with a knife.  Husband had to call his mother to care for the child, and then he would head into the dark to search for Wife.  A similar incident involved Wife locking herself in a room with a knife and the child, threatening to end her life, and by inference, their daughter’s life.  Husband broke a hole in the door to unlock it.  Aside from restraining Wife, this was the most physically ag","cbCaiqeQqdzJM9Yg","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqeQqdzJM9Yg","docx",32314,8,"English","en",105,"# I. INTRODUCTION\n## Parenting plan focus and GAL recommendations\n## 191 factors allegations\n# II. STATEMENT OF FACTS\n## Marriage, separation, and caregiving role changes\n## Domestic violence incidents and related reports\n## Threats with knives and emergency response\n## Divorce petition and contradictory allegations","[{\"question\":\"What is the main issue in this divorce case?\",\"answer\":\"The core issue is developing a parenting plan for the parties’ four-year-old daughter, Elsa.\"},{\"question\":\"What role does the GAL recommendation play?\",\"answer\":\"The GAL recommends naming the husband as the custodial parent and reports findings favorable to him regarding the 191 factors.\"},{\"question\":\"What types of allegations are raised under the 191 factors?\",\"answer\":\"Each party alleges numerous 191 factors such as domestic violence, drug abuse, and abusive use of conflict against the other.\"}]","Superior Court of Washington - Marital Dissolution (Divorce) Case Brief - Snohomish County | DOCX",1788222933,3,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":14,"keywords":34,"description":15,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":86,"head_meta":88,"extra_data":90,"updated_unix":28},"superior-court-of-washington-marital-dissolution-divorce-case-brief-snohomish-county","",{"@graph":36,"@context":85},[37,53,68],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,50],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":29},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",{"item":51,"name":14,"@type":43,"position":52},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/superior-court-of-washington-marital-dissolution-divorce-case-brief-snohomish-county/167978/",4,{"url":51,"name":14,"@type":54,"author":55,"headline":14,"publisher":57,"fileFormat":60,"inLanguage":23,"description":15,"dateModified":61,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":60,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":56},"Person",{"url":41,"name":58,"@type":59},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-09-03","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":11},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71,77,81],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"What is the main issue in this divorce case?","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"The core issue is developing a parenting plan for the parties’ four-year-old daughter, Elsa.","Answer",{"name":78,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":79},"What role does the GAL recommendation play?",{"text":80,"@type":76},"The GAL recommends naming the husband as the custodial parent and reports findings favorable to him regarding the 191 factors.",{"name":82,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":83},"What types of allegations are raised under the 191 factors?",{"text":84,"@type":76},"Each party alleges numerous 191 factors such as domestic violence, drug abuse, and abusive use of conflict against the other.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":51,"og:type":87,"og:title":14,"og:site_name":58,"og:description":15},"article",{"robots":89,"canonical":51},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":92},[93,98,103,108,113,118,123,126,131],{"id":94,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":99,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":100,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":102},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":104,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":105,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":107},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":109,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":110,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":112},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":114,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":115,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":119,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":12,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":13,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":125},30,"letters",{"id":127,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":129,"slug":130},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":132,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":133,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":134},158,"General","general-158"]