[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-172877-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":81,"doc-detail-172877-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","sunguide-software-users-group-meeting-minutes-april-25-2019","SunGuide Software User’s Group - Meeting Minutes - April 25, 2019","","SunGuide Software User’s Group meeting minutes dated April 25, 2019, covering feature requests and prioritization discussions for event-related software behavior. Topics include ignoring out-of-service cameras when searching for the nearest camera, configuring DMS graphics within EM templates via a selectable option or default behavior, and updating camera blocking functionality so it can apply to cameras rather than requiring a source or dummy source. Attendees discuss routing versus event-type graphics, toggles for on-route/off-route use, and constraints around incident graphics standardization.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/","Presentations",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/sunguide-software-users-group-meeting-minutes-april-25-2019/172877/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/sunguide-software-users-group-meeting-minutes-april-25-2019/172877.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Jake","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-23","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What problem is discussed with locating the closest camera to an event?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The current search ignores only cameras marked out of service, and the group discusses adding a disregard so the nearest available camera is chosen more efficiently.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How do attendees want DMS graphics to be handled in EM templates?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"They propose adding a template option (e.g., checkbox/toggle) to include or exclude graphics, with the ability to default off and optionally decide per event type or based on roadway versus event-type graphics.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What change is requested for camera blocking functionality?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Camera blocking should work directly with cameras (including those with embedded encoders/decoders) rather than requiring a preconfigured source or dummy source, while keeping a unified dialog for sources and cameras.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},172877,1791421306,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,87,92,97,102,107,112,117,122],{"id":55,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},90,"presentations",{"id":88,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":93,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":98,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":103,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":104,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":108,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":113,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":118,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":119,"show_sort_weight":120,"slug":121},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":123,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":125},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":127},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":128,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":22,"category_id":55,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":140,"read_time":26},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","SunGuide Software\nUser’s Group\nMeeting Minutes\nDate: April 25, 2019\nTime: 2:30pm-3:30pm EDT\nThis meeting is being recorded for the purpose of taking meeting minutes.\nSG 4776 Ignore Out of Service Cameras when Finding Closet Camera to an Event\nTucker: When you go to find the closest camera to an event, currently it takes you to the closest camera (geographically) to the event. There is a disregard camera that isis currently “Out of Service” when searching for the nearest camera. It would just be a quicker way to do this. This is not a big task and I wanted to open it up to see if anyone has any questions or comments on this.\nMark Dunthorn: Just for the sake of prioritizing, who would be interested in using this? We want to gauge the level of interest.\nMark Laird: District Six requested it so yes, we will be using it.\nAven Morgan: District Three would use it, this would be great.\nJacques Dupuy: I agree too.\nAllow DMS Graphics to be Defined in EM Template SG-4761\nTucker: The next issue is allowing DMS graphics to be defined in an EM Template. Currently, if you go to put graphics into a response plan, it looks for two things:\nDoes the DMS support graphics?\nIs there a graphic defined for the particular event type?\nIf those two things are true, it is going to try to put the image in there with the text. It will do its best to alter the text so both the text and graphics fit. If they don’t, the graphic will be forced out. The request is that there is no way to tell the software to exclude the graphic. The request was made to make that an option in the template feature.\nYou would be operating the EM templates to basically have a checkbox for the graphic. If you want the graphic, it will allow you to get the exact same behavior. It will also allow you to indicate that you do not want graphics and will use that as the default template. If we do that it would never attempt to put graphics on the sign. It would also allow you to specify per event type if you want to use a graphic. The templates are broken out by event types. It would give you a lot more flexibility on when graphics apply to response plans instead of always being there. Are there any questions?\nJason: So, this doesn’t allow you to determine what the graphic is?\nTucker: Right now, the graphic is tied to the event type. Are we looking to make it where you can use the template with any graphic?\nJason: Right now, it is tied to the roadway.\nTucker: I would think it is tied to the event type but either way it is to force you to use a particular one. The problem with that is it is a lot more specific and you would have to make a template per sign, per category which you can do but it is more work to configure.\nJason: So, the behavior right now as we see it, if graphics are enabled at all and if you create an RPG message it uses the roadway of the incident location. So, if you have a sign on I95 and you create an incident on I95 it will put a giant I95 shield on the sign which is redundant because they are already on I95. If you are not on I95 it would be useful but it would be an off-route template. I don’t believe there is an incident type defined set of graphics that we have been permitted to use.\nTucker: Are you more interested in a template that allows you to stick a specific graphics or do we want categories of graphics to use?\nJason: I think that was the initial idea to have a flag that says roadway graphic.\nTucker: So, you want to be able to choose the roadway graphic or event type graphic? And that is dependent on if there is a graphic defined.\nMark Laird: I do remember seeing event type graphics and producing messages that had them. We haven’t done it in a while. If you don’t have the graphics created, maybe we do the one route template and we have the graphics revert to the roadway graphics because it doesn’t have an event type. Is this possible?\nTucker: Yes, I was thinking of the ordering if it was event type then roadway or roadway then event type.\nMark Dunthorn: So, ","cbCailttxECqYRIc","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailttxECqYRIc","docx",81554,6,"English","# SG 4776 Ignore Out of Service Cameras when Finding Closet Camera to an Event\n## Prioritization and interest from districts\n# Allow DMS Graphics to be Defined in EM Template SG-4761\n## Current behavior and desired checkbox/toggle\n## Roadway vs event type graphics\n# Update Camera Blocking Functionality to Not Require VS Subsystem SG-4727\n## Applying blocking to cameras without dummy sources","[{\"question\":\"What problem is discussed with locating the closest camera to an event?\",\"answer\":\"The current search ignores only cameras marked out of service, and the group discusses adding a disregard so the nearest available camera is chosen more efficiently.\"},{\"question\":\"How do attendees want DMS graphics to be handled in EM templates?\",\"answer\":\"They propose adding a template option (e.g., checkbox/toggle) to include or exclude graphics, with the ability to default off and optionally decide per event type or based on roadway versus event-type graphics.\"},{\"question\":\"What change is requested for camera blocking functionality?\",\"answer\":\"Camera blocking should work directly with cameras (including those with embedded encoders/decoders) rather than requiring a preconfigured source or dummy source, while keeping a unified dialog for sources and cameras.\"}]","SunGuide Software User’s Group - Meeting Minutes - April 25, 2019 | DOCX",1788297335]