[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-305600-105":53,"doc-detail-305600-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","sugar-regulatory-administraton-performance-scorecard","SUGAR REGULATORY ADMINISTRATON Performance Scorecard","","Performance scorecard for the Sugar Regulatory Administration covering 2015 social impact and stakeholder-related objectives. It details component targets, GCG validation submissions, supporting documents, and formula-weighted ratings across multiple measurable indicators, including sugarcane productivity (yield per hectare), sugar production volumes, buffer stock balances for raw sugar supply-demand requirements, stakeholder satisfaction survey results, and validation or assistance metrics for new sugarcane block farms.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/sugar-regulatory-administraton-performance-scorecard/305600/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/sugar-regulatory-administraton-performance-scorecard/305600.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Putri","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-15","2026-09-19",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What indicators are used to assess social impact in the 2015 scorecard?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"The scorecard evaluates productivity and yield per hectare, sugar production volumes, and raw sugar buffer stock balances, along with stakeholder satisfaction and farmer support outcomes tied to block farms and distributed materials.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"How is the yield per hectare (TC/Ha) performance described?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"It presents yield(ton canes) per hectare for the crop year basis, including actual results and corresponding rating percentages, supported by area and sugar productivity reports and SRA sugar production bulletins.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Why were only 63 of the validated sugarcane block farms included in GCG validation?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"The document states that GCG validation excluded 33 block farms due to the absence of the SRA Block Farm Validation Report for those remaining farms.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},305600,1791739841,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":76},962085571259,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","# SUGAR REGULATORY ADMINISTRATONPerformance Scorecard\n\n\n| SOCIAL IMPACT   | Component  \u003Cbr>Target  \u003Cbr>Submission  \u003Cbr>GCG Validation  \u003Cbr>Supporting  \u003Cbr>Remarks  \u003Cbr>Documents  \u003Cbr>2015  \u003Cbr>Objective/Measure  \u003Cbr>Actual Rating Score Rating  \u003Cbr>Formula Weight  \u003Cbr>SO 1 Empowered Sector Significantly Contributing to Food Security and Poverty Reduction   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | SM 1   | Productivity/  \u003Cbr>Yield per Hectare  \u003Cbr>(TC/Ha)   | Yield(ton  \u003Cbr>canes)per  \u003Cbr>Hectare   | 8%   | 61-63  \u003Cbr>(TC/Ha)crop  \u003Cbr>year basis  \u003Cbr>(1 Sep 2014-  \u003Cbr>31 Aug 2015)   | 56.09   | 7.12%   | 56.09   | 7.12%   | ●Area and sugar  \u003Cbr>productivity Report  \u003Cbr>●SRA Sugar  \u003Cbr>Production Bulletin  \u003Cbr>Extension Services  \u003Cbr>Division Annual  \u003Cbr>Reports   | Total yield/produce for crop  \u003Cbr>year (CY)2014-2015 is  \u003Cbr>23,383,519 tonnes cane,  \u003Cbr>planted and harvested in  \u003Cbr>416,893 ha.   |  |  |\n|  | SM 2  \u003Cbr>SO 2  \u003Cbr>SM 3    | Sugar Production  \u003Cbr>(in Million Metric  \u003Cbr>Tons)   | Absolute  \u003Cbr>Number   | 10%   | 2.50 MMT  \u003Cbr>(crop year  \u003Cbr>basis)   | 2.32   | 9.3%   | 2.32   | 9.28%   | ●Cane and Sugar  \u003Cbr>Productions Imports,  \u003Cbr>Exports,and  \u003Cbr>Domestic  \u003Cbr>Withdrawals  \u003Cbr>·Final Production of  \u003Cbr>Raw Sugar(CY14-  \u003Cbr>15)   | Sugar production of each  \u003Cbr>major region is as follows(in  \u003Cbr>thousand MT):  \u003Cbr>252,982  \u003Cbr>Luzon  \u003Cbr>1,426,992  \u003Cbr>Negros  \u003Cbr>147,323  \u003Cbr>Panay  \u003Cbr>E.Visayas  \u003Cbr>35,322  \u003Cbr>461,198□  \u003Cbr>Mindanao  \u003Cbr>2,323,817  \u003Cbr>TOTAL   |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  |  | Maintained Balan  \u003Cbr>Buffer stock(MT)   | ced Sugar Sup  \u003Cbr>Absolute  \u003Cbr>Number   | ply and D  \u003Cbr>7%   | emand Require  \u003Cbr>200,000   | ments   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  | 500,204   | 7%   | 259,006   | 7%   | ·Final Raw Sugar  \u003Cbr>Balances Summary  \u003Cbr>●Mill Districts Buffer  \u003Cbr>Balances  \u003Cbr>Stock  \u003Cbr>Schedules   | Balances of SR  \u003Cbr>stock in metric t  \u003Cbr>CY 2014-15 is a  \u003Cbr>Luzon  \u003Cbr>Negros  \u003Cbr>Panay  \u003Cbr>E.Visayas  \u003Cbr>Mindanao  \u003Cbr>Total   | A's buffer  \u003Cbr>ons(MT)for  \u003Cbr>s follows:  \u003Cbr>20,532  \u003Cbr>160,156  \u003Cbr>22,445  \u003Cbr>1,418  \u003Cbr>54,445  \u003Cbr>259,006   |  |\n\n\n| SOCIAL IMPACT  \u003Cbr>STAKEHOLDERS   | Component  \u003Cbr>Target  \u003Cbr>GCG Validation  \u003Cbr>Submission  \u003Cbr>Supporting  \u003Cbr>Remarks  \u003Cbr>Objective/Measure      Formula  \u003Cbr>Documents  \u003Cbr>Score Rating  \u003Cbr>2015  \u003Cbr>Actual  \u003Cbr>Weight  \u003Cbr>Rating   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | SM 3   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | In comparison,the calendar  \u003Cbr>year ended December 2015  \u003Cbr>has the following balances:  \u003Cbr>26,861  \u003Cbr>Luzon  \u003Cbr>360,915□  \u003Cbr>Negros  \u003Cbr>44,563  \u003Cbr>Panay   |  |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | E.Visayas   | 3,836   |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Mindanao  \u003Cbr>Total   | 64,029  \u003Cbr>500,204   |  |  |  |\n|  | Subtotal   |  |  | 25%   |  |  | 23.42%   |  | 23.40%   |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  | SO 3 Improve Income.Profitability and Global Competitiveness of the Sugarcane Industry   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  | SM 4   | Stakeholder's  \u003Cbr>Satisfaction  \u003Cbr>Rating   | Survey  \u003Cbr>result   | 8%   | 90%   | 90%   | 8%   | 90%   | 8%   | ●Summary for 2015  \u003Cbr>Customer Feedback  \u003Cbr>for the Month   | SRA's overall ratin  \u003Cbr>(or 83.4%)with 5 a  \u003Cbr>highest.It should b  \u003Cbr>that the survey wa  \u003Cbr>conducted internall  \u003Cbr>SRA only committe  \u003Cbr>party surveyor for   \u003Cbr>Agreed Rating Sca  \u003Cbr>90 and above  \u003Cbr>80-89  \u003Cbr>70-79  \u003Cbr>50-69  \u003Cbr>49 and below   |  | g was 4.1  \u003Cbr>s the  \u003Cbr>e noted  \u003Cbr>s  \u003Cbr>y since  \u003Cbr>d to a thir  \u003Cbr>2016.  \u003Cbr>le:  \u003Cbr>100%  \u003Cbr>90%  \u003Cbr>80%  \u003Cbr>70%  \u003Cbr>0   |  | 7  \u003Cbr>d   |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  | SM 5   | Number of new  \u003Cbr>Sugarcane block  \u003Cbr>farms validated,  \u003Cbr>assisted,and  \u003Cbr>train","cbCaidZpfFHNYqiq","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidZpfFHNYqiq","pdf",2510376,8,"English","# Social Impact - Performance Scorecard\n## Productivity and Sugar Production Targets\n## Buffer Stock and Raw Sugar Balances\n## Stakeholder Satisfaction and Block Farm Validation\n## Distribution of Production-Related Materials and Services","[{\"question\":\"What indicators are used to assess social impact in the 2015 scorecard?\",\"answer\":\"The scorecard evaluates productivity and yield per hectare, sugar production volumes, and raw sugar buffer stock balances, along with stakeholder satisfaction and farmer support outcomes tied to block farms and distributed materials.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the yield per hectare (TC/Ha) performance described?\",\"answer\":\"It presents yield(ton canes) per hectare for the crop year basis, including actual results and corresponding rating percentages, supported by area and sugar productivity reports and SRA sugar production bulletins.\"},{\"question\":\"Why were only 63 of the validated sugarcane block farms included in GCG validation?\",\"answer\":\"The document states that GCG validation excluded 33 block farms due to the absence of the SRA Block Farm Validation Report for those remaining farms.\"}]","SUGAR REGULATORY ADMINISTRATON Performance Scorecard | PDF",1789826389]