[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-240328-105":53,"doc-detail-240328-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","staff-evaluation-template-examples","Staff Evaluation Template Examples","","Staff Evaluation Template Examples present scored components and rating outcomes for different teacher roles, including grade 4 teachers, high school algebra teachers, and K-5 art teachers. The templates clarify how to handle Alternate SLOs and optional measures when certain State-provided growth scores must be excluded, and how to compute Required Student Performance and Teacher Observation subcomponents using defined rubrics and weighting. They also specify how to determine the Overall Rating based on the matrix results for student performance and teacher observation.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/staff-evaluation-template-examples/240328/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/staff-evaluation-template-examples/240328.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Levi","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-11",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"When should the original State-provided growth score be excluded in the templates?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"If the plan uses an Alternate SLO, the original required or optional measure based on the State-provided growth score must be excluded, and the Required/Optional subcomponents must be calculated from the alternate measure rules.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How are Required Student Performance and Required Teacher Observation subcomponents determined?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Required Student Performance is based on the applicable (alternate or required) SLO submitted for the Required Student Performance subcomponent. Required Teacher Observation is calculated from the required principal and independent evaluator observations using the selected rubric and the weighting in the approved Evaluation plan.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How is the Overall Rating (e.g., Effective or Highly Effective) obtained?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The Overall Rating is determined using the matrix that combines the category ratings from Student Performance and Teacher Observation, applying the specified effective-level mapping for the relevant matrix code.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},240328,1789160039,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":125,"read_time":79},7971461740909,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Staff Evaluation Template Examples  \nExample A: Grade 4 Teacher  \n(Student Performance based on Alternate SLO, Optional Observation)  \nALTERNATE SLO: The original measure per Task 2 of the approved Evaluation plan is a State-provided growth score, which means original score/rating should be excluded and the Required Student Performance subcomponent is based on the ALTERNATE SLO.  \nSTUDENT PERFORMANCE  \nREQUIRED  \nThe State-provided growth score cannot be included in the evaluation, therefore the Alternate SLO1 should be used. The Alternate SLO based on a district-wide measure using all applicable Regents exams results in a score of 16, which should be submitted for the Required Student Performance subcomponent (REQSP=16) .  \n* The teacher should receive both a score of 16, and the corresponding rating of Effective for the Required Student Performance subcomponent.  \nOPTIONAL  \nSince the district chose not to use the Optional subcomponent, an Optional Student Performance subcomponent score isnot required, and nothing should be submitted (NO OPTSP) .  \n* The teacher should not receive an Optional Student Performance subcomponent score or rating.  \n* The Student Performance category rating should not be submitted; however, the teacher should receive a rating of Effective, based on only the Required subcomponent.  \nTEACHER OBSERVATION  \nREQUIRED  \nThe combination of the required principal and independent evaluator observations, based on the selected rubric, per the weighting indicated in the approved Evaluation plan, results in a score of 3.40, which should be submitted for the Required Teacher Observation subcomponent (REQOB=3.40) .  \n* The teacher should receive both a score of 3.40, and the corresponding rating of Effective for their Required Teacher Observation subcomponent.  \nOPTIONAL  \nReceives a score of 3.30, based on peer observation using the selected rubric, which should be submitted for the Optional Teacher Observation subcomponent (OPTOB=3 .30) .  \n* The teacher should receive both a score of 3.30, and the corresponding rating of Effective for their Optional Teacher Observation subcomponent.  \n* The Teacher Observation category rating should not be submitted; however, the teacher should receive a rating of Effective, based on the combination of the Required and Optional subcomponents, per the weighting indicated in the approved Evaluation plan.  \nOVERALL RATING  \nReceives an Overall Rating of Effective based on the combination of the Student Performance (Effective) and Teacher Observation (Effective) category ratings, per the matrix (OCR03) .  \n* The teacher should receive a rating of Effective for their Overall Rating.  \n1 For Evaluation plans under Education Law §3012-d approved after March 10, 2016, Alternate SLOs are included in Tasks 2 and 7 Transition. For plans under Education Law §3012-d approved on or before March 10, 2016, Alternate SLOs are included on the approved Supplemental Form for Alternate SLOs.  \nExample B: High School Algebra Teacher  \n(Optional Student Performance based on additional State-provided growth score excluded)  \nOPTIONAL MEASURE EXCLUDED: The original optional measure per Task 3 of the approved Evaluation plan is based on an additional State-provided growth score, which means original score/rating should be excluded and student performance is based ONLY on the Required Student Performance subcomponent.  \nSTUDENT PERFORMANCE  \nREQUIRED  \nReceives an SLO score of 18 based on the Algebra I Regents, per Task 2 of the approved Evaluation plan (an Alternate SLO isnot needed) which should be submitted for the Required Student Performance subcomponent (REQSP=18) .  \n* The teacher should receive both a score of 18, and the corresponding rating of Highly Effective for their Required Student Performance subcomponent.  \nOPTIONAL  \nThe optional measure, a second State-provided growth score, cannot be included in the evaluation; therefore, the Optional Student Performance subcomponent should not be s","cbCainAYguY8lQQZ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainAYguY8lQQZ","pdf",550801,10,"English","# Staff Evaluation Template Examples\n## Example A: Grade 4 Teacher\n## Example B: High School Algebra Teacher\n## Example C: K-5 Art Teacher","[{\"question\":\"When should the original State-provided growth score be excluded in the templates?\",\"answer\":\"If the plan uses an Alternate SLO, the original required or optional measure based on the State-provided growth score must be excluded, and the Required/Optional subcomponents must be calculated from the alternate measure rules.\"},{\"question\":\"How are Required Student Performance and Required Teacher Observation subcomponents determined?\",\"answer\":\"Required Student Performance is based on the applicable (alternate or required) SLO submitted for the Required Student Performance subcomponent. Required Teacher Observation is calculated from the required principal and independent evaluator observations using the selected rubric and the weighting in the approved Evaluation plan.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the Overall Rating (e.g., Effective or Highly Effective) obtained?\",\"answer\":\"The Overall Rating is determined using the matrix that combines the category ratings from Student Performance and Teacher Observation, applying the specified effective-level mapping for the relevant matrix code.\"}]","Staff Evaluation Template Examples | PDF"]