[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-168914-en":3,"doc-seo-168914-105":29,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":93},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":11,"category_id":12,"category_name":13,"doc_title":14,"doc_description":15,"doc_content":16,"file_id":17,"file_url":18,"file_type":19,"file_size":20,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":11,"is_downloadable":11,"audit_status":11,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":15,"update_tm":28,"read_time":11},168914,4398048950312,"Violet","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/400002538284de19e3c?_k=1778320343897328908",1,158,"General","SOP - Developing a New Study with the Network Coordinating Center (pre-award)","This SOP standardizes Coordinating Center procedures for collaborating with an investigator to develop a new study that will involve the Coordinating Center and, where applicable, network clinics. It describes the end-to-end pre-award workflow: initial PI inquiry, consultation, assignment of a project manager, feasibility and budget review using established selection criteria, and iterative development of required study information. It also covers preparation of grant documents, clinic and site support actions when needed, confirmation of submission, and follow-up scheduling.","SOP – Developing a New Study with the Network Coordinating Center (pre-award)\nThis SOP standardizes Coordinating Center procedures when collaborating with an investigator on development of a new study that will involve the Coordinating Center and, if applicable, network clinics. The process focuses on grants to federal funding agencies but can be adapted to other funding sources.\nThis SOP is aligned and conducted in parallel with the SOP – Budget Development, Amendment & Monitoring Procedures and shown in the SAMPLE WORKFLOW – Study Approval Process. Study vetting and selection criteria are referenced throughout this SOP (see TEMPLATE – Study Vetting and Selection Criteria).\nSuggestion: Busy clinics rarely have dedicated research time for clinicians and other personnel or the means to provide compensation for unfunded grant development. Limit grant development efforts with clinics until funding is secured to preserve capacity for study activities.\nDeveloping a New Study with the NETWORK Coordinating Center\nCONSULT AND PRE-AWARD\nInitial inquiry by the PI is received by the NETWORK Coordinating Center, which reviews inquiry, obtains additional information as needed, and schedules consultation or refers the PI to other relevant resources\nAn initial consultation is conducted with the PI and NETWORK Coordinating Center. Typical agenda items include:\nProject overview\nNETWORK overview and process of working together\nDiscussion of potential fit with NETWORK priorities and brainstorm possible network collaboration\nAnticipated funding mechanism\nThe NETWORK Coordinating Center determines whether the project will proceed and assigns a project manager.\nThe project manager provides a template for the PI to complete with study information relevant to the NETWORK and clinics (see TEMPLATE – Study Information Sheet), describes the new study review process (see TEMPLATE – Study Vetting and Selection Criteria), and answers questions, as needed.\nThe project manager facilitates NETWORK Coordinating Center review using established selection criteria (see TEMPLATE – Study Vetting and Selection Criteria) and iterative development of the study information sheet with the PI (may include additional consult meetings). Typically, the NETWORK Coordinating Center provide feedback on feasibility methods, and budget.\nThe project manager adds a discussion of the new study opportunity to the next NETWORK GOVERNING BOARD meeting agenda and distributes the study information sheet to all board members.\nNETWORK Coordinating Center personnel present the new opportunity to the NETWORK GOVERNING BOARD for review using established criteria (see TEMPLATE – Study Vetting and Selection Criteria). The GOVERNING BOARD may approve the opportunity with or without modification, require additional review, or deny the project.\nThe project manager notifies the PI of the review outcome and proceeds with further pre-award support (below) or refers PI to relevant resources.\nThe project manager facilitates development discussions with the PI and appropriate NETWORK Coordinating Center personnel, as needed. Topics include:\nResearch question and related evidence\nStudy design, methods, and protocol\nScopes of work and budgets for the NETWORK Coordinating Center and participating clinics\nRequired grant documents\nThe project manager implements scope of work and budget development (see SOP – Budget Development, Amendment, and Modification Procedures)\nThe project manager implements clinic recruitment if identification of participating clinics is required during the pre-award phase (see SOP – Conducting a Study with the Network Coordinating Center (post-award), Site Recruitment Section).\nThe project manager drafts required documents, facilitating NETWORK Coordinating Center involvement, as needed. Required documentation may include:\nNETWORK letter of support\nClinic letters of support (only if required for application and there is sufficient lead time)\nDescription of the NETWORK\nGather informa","cbCaiqhGZf2KmlXk","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqhGZf2KmlXk","docx",32924,3,"English","en",105,"# CONSULT AND PRE-AWARD\n## Initial inquiry and consultation\n## Project manager responsibilities and review workflow\n## Governing board review and outcomes\n## Pre-award development, documents, and submission\n# REFERENCE TOOLS AND TEMPLATES","[{\"question\":\"What triggers the pre-award process in this SOP?\",\"answer\":\"The PI’s initial inquiry is received by the Network Coordinating Center, which reviews it, requests additional information, and schedules consultation or directs the PI to relevant resources.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the Network Coordinating Center decide whether the project will proceed?\",\"answer\":\"After consulting and iterative planning supported by established selection criteria, the Network Coordinating Center determines whether the project proceeds and assigns a project manager for further pre-award support.\"},{\"question\":\"What documents and content are prepared during pre-award?\",\"answer\":\"The project manager drafts required grant documentation, which may include letters of support, description of the network, clinic information, scopes of work, budgets and justifications, subcontract support facilitation, and collaborator biosketches as needed.\"},{\"question\":\"What happens after grant documentation is sent to the PI?\",\"answer\":\"The project manager sends all grant documentation to the PI, confirms grant submission, and sets a follow-up schedule aligned with the anticipated study start date to track funding outcomes and start timing.\"}]","SOP - Developing a New Study with the Network Coordinating Center (pre-award) | DOCX",1788239327,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":14,"keywords":33,"description":15,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":88,"head_meta":90,"extra_data":92,"updated_unix":28},"sop-developing-a-new-study-with-the-network-coordinating-center-pre-award","",{"@graph":35,"@context":87},[36,52,66],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,47,49],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":46},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":48,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":21},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/",{"item":50,"name":14,"@type":42,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/sop-developing-a-new-study-with-the-network-coordinating-center-pre-award/168914/",4,{"url":50,"name":14,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":14,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"inLanguage":23,"description":15,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":40,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":11},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79,83],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What triggers the pre-award process in this SOP?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"The PI’s initial inquiry is received by the Network Coordinating Center, which reviews it, requests additional information, and schedules consultation or directs the PI to relevant resources.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How does the Network Coordinating Center decide whether the project will proceed?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"After consulting and iterative planning supported by established selection criteria, the Network Coordinating Center determines whether the project proceeds and assigns a project manager for further pre-award support.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What documents and content are prepared during pre-award?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"The project manager drafts required grant documentation, which may include letters of support, description of the network, clinic information, scopes of work, budgets and justifications, subcontract support facilitation, and collaborator biosketches as needed.",{"name":84,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":85},"What happens after grant documentation is sent to the PI?",{"text":86,"@type":74},"The project manager sends all grant documentation to the PI, confirms grant submission, and sets a follow-up schedule aligned with the anticipated study start date to track funding outcomes and start timing.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":89,"og:title":14,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":15},"article",{"robots":91,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":94},[95,100,105,110,115,120,125,130,135],{"id":96,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":101,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":106,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":111,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":116,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":121,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":122,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":124},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":126,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":127,"show_sort_weight":128,"slug":129},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":131,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":132,"show_sort_weight":133,"slug":134},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":12,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":13,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":136},"general-158"]