[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-280915-105":53,"doc-detail-280915-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","second-superseding-indictment","Second Superseding Indictment","","Second superseding indictment charging multiple defendants in the District of Wyoming with securities-related and fraud offenses. The indictment alleges misuse of SEC enforcement authority, prior bars on penny-stock participation, formation and control of entities and bank accounts, and a scheme to defraud investors in a natural gas production venture. It describes misleading claims about legal rights to wells, acquisition and “clean up” of a shell company, expected returns, investment use for expenses, restricted and free-trading share issuance, concealed trading, withheld certificates, and nominee control of the company.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/second-superseding-indictment/280915/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/second-superseding-indictment/280915.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Berry Peter","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-09-16",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What offenses does the second superseding indictment allege?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"The grand jury charges defendants with offenses including wire fraud, securities fraud, mail fraud, conspiracy, and related aiding and abetting provisions, along with an identity-theft forfeiture notice context.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"What scheme to defraud is described in the indictment?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"The indictment alleges a scheme to induce investors to fund a natural gas production venture by claiming control over wells, using investor money to “clean up” a shell company, and misleading investors about the use and disposition of funds and shares.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How did the indictment claim the defendants handled securities and investor access?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"It alleges restricted shares were issued to create a false impression of progress, free-trading shares were obtained through false information, sales were concealed from some investors, and original certificates for free-trading shares were withheld while company control was concealed via a nominee.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},280915,1790203853,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":8},1374402524268,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","Case 2:19-cr-00026-ABJ Document 65 Filed 11/21/19 Page 1 of 31  \n# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING\n\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  \nPlaintiff,  \nV.  \nROBERT WILLIAMMITCHELL,a/k/a Bob Mitchell,(Counts 1-15)  \nJUSTIN WALLACE HERMAN,(Counts 13-19)  \nCHARLES WINIFRED WINTERSJR.,a/k/a Chuck Winters,(Counts 13-17)  \nand  \nIAN HORN,  \n(Counts 13-15)  \nDefendants.  \n## SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT\n\nTHE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:  \n1.   The United States Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC)is an agency of theUnited States government that enforces federal securities laws.The SEC has the power to suspend  \nASPEASPENo.  19-CR-026-ABJCts 1-8:18 U.S.C.§1343(Wire Fraud)Cts 9-10:18 U.S.C.§1348(1)(Securities Fraud)Cts 11-12:18 U.S.C.§1341(Mail Fraud)Ct 13:18 U.S.C.§371(Conspiracy to CommitSecurities Fraud)Ct 14:15 U.S.C.S§78j(b)and78ff and 18 U.S.C.§2(Securities Fraud andAiding and Abetting)Ct 15:18 U.S.C.§1349(Conspiracy to CommitWire Fraud)Cts 16-19:18 U.S.C.§1028A(a)(1)(Aggravated IdentityTheft)**FORFEITURE NOTICE**  \n2019NOV 21 AH 8:25  \nSCLERK  \nthe public sale of regulated securities,and to prohibit individuals from participating in offeringsof regulated securities.  \n2.On March 30,1999,the SEC barred Defendant ROBERT WILLIAMMITCHELL,a/k/a Bob Mitchell,from participation in penny-stock offerings.This order was ineffect at all times relevant to this indictment.  \n3.  On January 25,2013,Defendant MITCHELL organized Bravo Two Zero PartnersLLC as a Colorado limited-liability company.That same day,MITCHELL opened an account atJPMorgan Chase Bank (which account number ended in 2110)in the name of Bravo Two ZeroPartners LLC.MITCHELL controlled this account as the only authorized signer.  \n4.  On February 5,2014,Defendant MITCHELL opened an account at Wells FargoBank(which account number ended in 5707)in the name of Bravo Two Zero Partners LLC.MITCHELL controlled this account as the only authorized signer.  \n5.Beginning May 27,2008,and continuing through at least April 13,2015,EcoEmissions Solutions Inc.(EcoEmissions)was an issuer of securities required to file reportsunder section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15U.S.C.§78o(d)).  \n6.On March 23,2015,EcoEmissions filed with the Delaware Secretary of Stateamendments changing its name to NuTech Energy Resources Inc.The company continued,however,to use the name EcoEmissions on stock certificates.  \n7.On June 26,2015,NuTech Energy Resources Inc.(NuTech)changed its tradingsymbol from ECMZ to NERG.  \n8.   The SEC suspended trading of NuTech stock on May 20,2016.  \n9.  Beginning no later than 1983 and continuing through at least April 8,2016,EliteData Services Inc.a/k/a DEAC was an issuer with a class of securities registered under section 12of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C.§78D).  \n## THE SCHEME TO DEFRAUD INVESTORS\n\n10.  Beginning on a date unknown to the grand jury but no later than May 18,2012,andcontinuing through at least January 17,2017,Defendant ROBERT WILLIAM MITCHELL,a/k/a Bob Mitchell,with intent to defraud,knowingly devised and intended to devise a schemeand artifice to defraud(\"the scheme\"),and MITCHELL willfully participated in the scheme withknowledge of its fraudulent intent.  \n11.  Investors and potential investors believed a natural gas production venture could beprofitable by using a downhole tool to reduce production costs,and by taking control of existingbut unused wells.As part of the scheme,Defendant MITCHELL encouraged and took advantageof this belief by(among other things)claiming that he had a legal right to a number of existingwells free and clear of any debt.  \n12.  It was further part of the scheme that Defendant MITCHELL told potentialinvestors,and caused other individuals to tell potential investors,that MITCHELL could make anatural gas production venture successful by using investors'money to acquire and \"clean up”ashell company,and then use the cleaned-up shell to enrich investors by giving them shares of apublic ","cbCaid5Xy9Xp9Bw9","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaid5Xy9Xp9Bw9","pdf",1695391,31,"English","# SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT\n# THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:\n## FORFEITURE NOTICE\n# THE SCHEME TO DEFRAUD INVESTORS","[{\"question\":\"What offenses does the second superseding indictment allege?\",\"answer\":\"The grand jury charges defendants with offenses including wire fraud, securities fraud, mail fraud, conspiracy, and related aiding and abetting provisions, along with an identity-theft forfeiture notice context.\"},{\"question\":\"What scheme to defraud is described in the indictment?\",\"answer\":\"The indictment alleges a scheme to induce investors to fund a natural gas production venture by claiming control over wells, using investor money to “clean up” a shell company, and misleading investors about the use and disposition of funds and shares.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the indictment claim the defendants handled securities and investor access?\",\"answer\":\"It alleges restricted shares were issued to create a false impression of progress, free-trading shares were obtained through false information, sales were concealed from some investors, and original certificates for free-trading shares were withheld while company control was concealed via a nominee.\"}]","Second Superseding Indictment | PDF",1789562136]