[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-255364-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":81,"doc-detail-255364-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","rfp-revisions-i-10-widening-from-i-295-to-i-95-addendum-no-1-e2y63","RFP REVISIONS - I-10 Widening from I-295 to I-95 - Addendum No. 1, E2Y63","","Addendum No. 1 to the RFP for the I-10 widening project from I-295 to I-95 revises multiple sections governing bidder requirements, project scope language, and supporting documentation. The updates clarify introduction and drainage wording, right-of-way work area restrictions, and NEPA reevaluation processing. The schedule of events is adjusted, including ATC meeting dates and written response deadlines. Threshold, DBE, and work provisions are refined with added FHWA oversight, permitting and public notice fee language, TTCP and vibration monitoring requirements, and multiple design and construction criteria changes.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/","Letters",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/rfp-revisions-i-10-widening-from-i-295-to-i-95-addendum-no-1-e2y63/255364/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/rfp-revisions-i-10-widening-from-i-295-to-i-95-addendum-no-1-e2y63/255364.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Tawan","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-13",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What project and procurement does this addendum apply to?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The addendum applies to the FDOT RFP revisions for the I-10 widening project from I-295 to I-95, issued to prospective bidders with Addendum No. 1 (E2Y63).","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What types of changes are made in the RFP revisions?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Revisions clarify language across sections, update requirements and oversight provisions, add or remove references, and adjust deadlines within the schedule of events.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"Which major requirement areas are updated for bidders and proposals?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Updates cover threshold requirements, the DBE program reporting references, project work provisions, technical proposal requirements, and bid proposal requirements, along with detailed design and construction criteria.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},255364,1790713843,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,89,94,99,104,109,114,118,123],{"id":85,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":86,"show_sort_weight":87,"slug":88},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":90,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":91,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":95,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":100,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":105,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":110,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":115,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},18,30,"letters",{"id":119,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":124,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":126},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":128},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":129,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":22,"category_id":115,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":33,"language":136,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":140,"read_time":26},2336475104042,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000c4c32af1715be0?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786537525561427321","RON DESANTIS GOVERNOR  \nFlorida Department of Transportation  \n1109 S. Marion Avenue  \nLake City, Florida 32025-5874  \nKEVIN J. THIBAULT, P.E. SECRETARY  \nFebruary 28, 2019  \nTo: Prospective Bidders  \nAddendum No.: 1, E2Y63, FIN\\#439100-1-52-01 & 439100-1-56-01  \nFederal Aid \\# D217 128 B  \nI-10 Widening from I-295 to I-95  \nRFP REVISIONS  \n1. Section I – Introduction  \na. Page 1 Introduction – Removed Scope Alternate language  \nb. Page 2 Overview – Clarified language  \nc. Page 3 Structures – Updated Cedar River and Day Ave. tunnel box culvert requirements  \nd. Page 3 Drainage – Clarified language  \ne. Page 4 Utilities – Added reference to existing utility locate information  \nf. Page 4 Right of Way – Clarified work area restrictions  \ng. Page 5 Right of Way – Added statement regarding contract time  \nh. Page 10 I. B – Clarified processing requirements for NEPA Reevaluations  \n2. Section II – Schedule of Events  \na. Page 11 Updated date of ATC Meeting Nos. 2 & 3 and associated calendar events  \nb. Page 12 Added deadline for submittal of written responses to the  \nDepartment’s follow-up questions  \nc. Page 12 Revised deadline to submit written statement per Section  \nIII. F of the RFP  \n3. Section III – Threshold Requirements  \na. Page 13 III. D – Clarified FHWA oversight language  \nb. Page 14 III. E – Clarified FHWA oversight language; removed reference to Q&A session  \nc. Page 14 III. E – Added roll plots submitted with the Technical Proposal to the items acceptable to reference during the Page-Turn Meeting  \nd. Page 14 III. F – Revised deadline for submittal of written  \n4. Section IV – Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program  \na. Page 17 IV.A – Updated items reported to FHWA  \nb. Page 17 IV.A – Added reference to FDOT Contract Compliance Manual  \n[www.fdot.gov](www.fdot.gov)  \n5. Section V – Project Requirements and Provisions for Work  \na. Page 20 V.A – Added FDOT Contract Compliance Manual to the list of Governing Regulations  \nb. Page 22 V. B – Added FHWA oversight language  \nc. Page 22 V. B – Added ATC requirements for Landscape Opportunity Areas  \nd. Page 23 V. B – Added FHWA oversight language  \ne. Page 25 V. E – Added reference to public notice fees; clarified permitting language  \nf. Page 27 V. G – Clarified right of way survey and mapping requirements  \ng. Page 29 V. I – Added requirement for submittal workshop  \nh. Page 30 V. I – Added ERC comment certification requirement  \ni. Page 31 V. I – Clarified As-built requirements  \nj. Page 32 V. I – Clarified As-built requirements  \nk. Page 35 V.O – Clarified public involvement requirements  \nl. Page 36 V.O – Clarified public involvement requirements  \nm. Page 37 V.O – Clarified public involvement requirements  \nn. Page 40 V.W – Added reference to permit coordination with adjacent projects; added traffic control requirement related to adjacent projects  \no. Page 40 V.X – Added reference to District Utility Administrator  \n6. Section VI – Design and Construction Criteria  \na. Page 41 VI.A – Clarified rigid barrier requirements on I-10  \nb. Page 42 VI.A – Clarified D-B responsibilities for concrete pavement repair  \nc. Page 42 VI. B – Clarified Vibration and Settlement Monitoring Plan submittal requirements  \nd. Page 43 VI. B – Clarified Vibration and Settlement Monitoring Plan submittal requirements  \ne. Page 51 VI. E – Clarified FHWA oversight language; Added base clearance requirement for widening  \nf. Page 53 VI. E – Added restriction on vertical drain pipes in MSE fill; added reference to meeting with District Environmental Permit Coordinator  \ng. Page 54 VI. E – Added minimum culvert size for Cedar River culvert  \nh. Page 56 VI. F, Miscellaneous – Clarified maximum fill height requirement  \ni. Page 60 VI. H.2.v – Added restrictions on bridge mounted sign supports  \nj. Page 60 VI. H.2.v – Deleted requirement for minimum extension of box culverts past MSE walls  \nk. Page 62 VI. I – Clarified specification requirements  \nl. Page 63 VI. I – Updated web address f","cbCaiq2nqsozJ804","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiq2nqsozJ804","pdf",265337,"English","# Addendum and RFP Reference\n## Section I – Introduction\n## Section II – Schedule of Events\n## Section III – Threshold Requirements\n## Section IV – Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program\n## Section V – Project Requirements and Provisions for Work\n## Section VI – Design and Construction Criteria\n## Section VII – Technical Proposal Requirement\n## Section VIII – Bid Proposal Requirements\n## Appendix E – Typical Section Package\n## Appendix G – Horizontal Layout","[{\"question\":\"What project and procurement does this addendum apply to?\",\"answer\":\"The addendum applies to the FDOT RFP revisions for the I-10 widening project from I-295 to I-95, issued to prospective bidders with Addendum No. 1 (E2Y63).\"},{\"question\":\"What types of changes are made in the RFP revisions?\",\"answer\":\"Revisions clarify language across sections, update requirements and oversight provisions, add or remove references, and adjust deadlines within the schedule of events.\"},{\"question\":\"Which major requirement areas are updated for bidders and proposals?\",\"answer\":\"Updates cover threshold requirements, the DBE program reporting references, project work provisions, technical proposal requirements, and bid proposal requirements, along with detailed design and construction criteria.\"}]","RFP REVISIONS - I-10 Widening from I-295 to I-95 - Addendum No. 1, E2Y63 | PDF",1789288785]