[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-237707-en":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":31,"doc-seo-237707-105":76},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":11,"category_id":12,"category_name":13,"doc_title":14,"doc_description":15,"doc_content":16,"file_id":17,"file_url":18,"file_type":19,"file_size":20,"view_count":21,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":11,"is_downloadable":11,"audit_status":11,"page_count":22,"language":23,"language_code":24,"site_id":25,"html_lang":24,"table_of_contents":26,"faqs":27,"seo_title":28,"seo_description":15,"update_tm":29,"read_time":30},237707,687197100911,"Himbo","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/a000239b6f1da00475?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1785132997149421697",1,21,"Paper Templates","Restitution and Compensation Orders - Issues and Options Paper","A policy and legal issues paper examining restitution and compensation orders, authored by the Sentencing Advisory Council (March 2018). It covers key contributors and establishes definitions through a glossary and abbreviations, then outlines submission requests and an executive summary. The paper analyzes Victoria’s use of these orders, enforcement mechanisms, and the purposes of sentencing, before comparing approaches in other jurisdictions and proposing measures for reform, supported by references and an appendix on preliminary consultations.","Restitution and Compensation Orders: Issues and Options Paper\nSentencing Advisory Council\u000bMarch 2018\nContents\n\u0013 TOC \\p \" \" \\h \\z \\t \"Heading 1,1,Heading 1 Numbered,1\" \u0014\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037591\" \u0014Contributors \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037591 \\h \u00142\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037592\" \u0014Abbreviations \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037592 \\h \u00143\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037593\" \u0014Glossary \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037593 \\h \u00143\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037594\" \u0014Call for submissions \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037594 \\h \u00147\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037595\" \u0014Executive summary \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037595 \\h \u00149\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037596\" \u0014Summary of questions \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037596 \\h \u001423\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037597\" \u00141\tTerms of reference: Introduction, background and scope \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037597 \\h \u001426\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037598\" \u00142\tRestitution and compensation orders in Victoria \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037598 \\h \u001442\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037599\" \u00143\tEnforcement of restitution and compensation orders in Victoria \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037599 \\h \u001483\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037600\" \u00144\tThe purposes of sentencing in Victoria \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037600 \\h \u0014120\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037601\" \u00145\tApproaches to restitution and compensation orders in other jurisdictions \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037601 \\h \u0014132\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037602\" \u00146\tMeasures for reform \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037602 \\h \u0014160\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037603\" \u0014Appendix: Preliminary consultations \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037603 \\h \u0014204\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc508037604\" \u0014References \u0013 PAGEREF _Toc508037604 \\h \u0014205\u0015\u0015\n\u0015\nContributors\nAuthors: Anusha Kenny and Megan Styles\nData analyst: Dennis Byles\nSentencing Advisory Council\nChair: Arie Freiberg AM\nDeputy-Chair: Lisa Ward\nCouncil Directors: Carmel Arthur, Hugh de Kretser, Fiona Dowsley, Helen Fatouros, David Grace QC, John Griffin PSM, Sherril Handley, Brendan Kissane QC, Shane Patton, Barbara Rozenes, Geoff Wilkinson OAM\nChief Executive Officer: Cynthia Marwood\nAcknowledgments\nThe Council would like to thank all of the stakeholders who met or spoke with us during preliminary consultations on this project, including the Supreme Court of Victoria, the County Court of Victoria, the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria, the Children’s Court of Victoria, Victoria Police, the Office of Public Prosecutions, Victoria Legal Aid, the Victorian Law Reform Commission, the Victims of Crime Commissioner, the Department of Justice and Regulation, Waller Legal, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland, Legal Aid Queensland and the Ministry of Justice, New Zealand. The Council also thanks the following for providing data: the Chief Magistrate of the Magistrates Court of Queensland, the Chief Magistrate of the Adelaide Magistrates Court, Court Services Victoria, the Office of Public Prosecutions, Infringement Management and Enforcement Services, Department of Justice and Regulation, and Asset Confiscation Operations, Department of Justice and Regulation.\nAbbreviations\nACO: Asset Confiscation Operations\nIMES: Infringement Management and Enforcement Services\nOPP: Office of Public Prosecutions\nVOCA Act: Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1996 (Vic)\nVOCAT: Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal\nVLRC: Victorian Law Reform Commission\nGlossary\nAccused: A person who is charged with a criminal offence.\nAdjourned undertaking: A sentence type that involves the adjournment of a criminal matter and the release of an offender, with or without conviction, for a specified period provided the offender gives an undertaking to comply with attached conditions.\nAverage: A measure of the central tendency of a distribution of numerical values, also known as the mean. The average (or mean) is calculated by adding all the values in the set, then dividing the total by the number of values used. For example, 2.8 is the average value in the following set of numbers: 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5. The average is the sum of the values in the set (in this case 17) divided by the number of values used to reach that total (in this case 6). The average is ","cbCaipwQWXL3ONVk","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaipwQWXL3ONVk","docx",214373,8,220,"English","en",105,"# Contributors\n# Abbreviations\n# Glossary\n# Call for submissions\n# Executive summary\n# Summary of questions\n# Terms of reference: Introduction, background and scope\n# Restitution and compensation orders in Victoria\n# Enforcement of restitution and compensation orders in Victoria\n# The purposes of sentencing in Victoria\n# Approaches to restitution and compensation orders in other jurisdictions\n# Measures for reform\n# Appendix: Preliminary consultations\n# References","[{\"question\":\"What does the paper cover about restitution and compensation orders?\",\"answer\":\"It reviews restitution and compensation orders in Victoria, explains how they are enforced, and discusses the purposes of sentencing. It also compares approaches in other jurisdictions and outlines reform measures.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the document structured for readers?\",\"answer\":\"It provides contributors, abbreviations, and a glossary, followed by a call for submissions, an executive summary, and a summary of questions. The main body then moves through Victoria’s framework, enforcement, comparative approaches, and reform options.\"},{\"question\":\"Who is responsible for the authorship and governance of the paper?\",\"answer\":\"The authors are Anusha Kenny and Megan Styles, with data analysis by Dennis Byles, within the Sentencing Advisory Council. It lists the chair, deputy-chair, council directors, and the chief executive officer.\"}]","Restitution and Compensation Orders - Issues and Options Paper | DOCX",1789115587,77,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":32},[33,39,44,49,54,59,64,69,72],{"id":34,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":35,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},11,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":40,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":35,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":45,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":35,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":50,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":35,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":53},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":55,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":35,"category_name":56,"show_sort_weight":57,"slug":58},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":60,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":35,"category_name":61,"show_sort_weight":62,"slug":63},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":65,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":35,"category_name":66,"show_sort_weight":67,"slug":68},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":12,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":35,"category_name":13,"show_sort_weight":70,"slug":71},5,"papers-templates",{"id":73,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":35,"category_name":74,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":75},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":77,"data":78},"ok",{"site_id":25,"language":24,"slug":79,"title":14,"keywords":80,"description":15,"schema_data":81,"social_meta":137,"head_meta":139,"extra_data":141,"updated_unix":142},"restitution-and-compensation-orders-issues-and-options-paper","",{"@graph":82,"@context":136},[83,99,119],{"@type":84,"itemListElement":85},"BreadcrumbList",[86,90,93,96],{"item":87,"name":88,"@type":89,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":91,"name":35,"@type":89,"position":92},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":94,"name":13,"@type":89,"position":95},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/paper-templates/",3,{"item":97,"name":14,"@type":89,"position":98},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/restitution-and-compensation-orders-issues-and-options-paper/237707/",4,{"url":97,"name":14,"@type":100,"image":101,"author":106,"headline":14,"publisher":108,"fileFormat":111,"inLanguage":24,"description":15,"dateModified":112,"datePublished":113,"encodingFormat":111,"isAccessibleForFree":114,"interactionStatistic":115},"DigitalDocument",{"url":102,"@type":103,"width":104,"height":105},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/restitution-and-compensation-orders-issues-and-options-paper/237707.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":9,"@type":107},"Person",{"url":87,"name":109,"@type":110},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-07","2026-09-11",true,{"@type":116,"interactionType":117,"userInteractionCount":21},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":118},"ViewAction",{"@type":120,"mainEntity":121},"FAQPage",[122,128,132],{"name":123,"@type":124,"acceptedAnswer":125},"What does the paper cover about restitution and compensation orders?","Question",{"text":126,"@type":127},"It reviews restitution and compensation orders in Victoria, explains how they are enforced, and discusses the purposes of sentencing. It also compares approaches in other jurisdictions and outlines reform measures.","Answer",{"name":129,"@type":124,"acceptedAnswer":130},"How is the document structured for readers?",{"text":131,"@type":127},"It provides contributors, abbreviations, and a glossary, followed by a call for submissions, an executive summary, and a summary of questions. The main body then moves through Victoria’s framework, enforcement, comparative approaches, and reform options.",{"name":133,"@type":124,"acceptedAnswer":134},"Who is responsible for the authorship and governance of the paper?",{"text":135,"@type":127},"The authors are Anusha Kenny and Megan Styles, with data analysis by Dennis Byles, within the Sentencing Advisory Council. It lists the chair, deputy-chair, council directors, and the chief executive officer.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":97,"og:type":138,"og:title":14,"og:site_name":109,"og:description":15},"article",{"robots":140,"canonical":97},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":25},1790368358]