[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-189680-105":53,"doc-detail-189680-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","researchevaluation-after-action-learning-review-template-after-action-review-meeting","Research/Evaluation After-Action Learning Review Template - After-Action Review Meeting","","Structured template for documenting a comprehensive research/evaluation after-action learning review. Captures key project details, meeting logistics, and a full sequence of prompts covering research/evaluation design, data collection and entry, analysis and dissemination, and operational requirements such as resources, roles, partnerships, and timeline adherence. Includes sections for key takeaways and prioritized action items with assignment and deadlines to support continuous improvement across future research or evaluation agendas.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/researchevaluation-after-action-learning-review-template-after-action-review-meeting/189680/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/researchevaluation-after-action-learning-review-template-after-action-review-meeting/189680.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Asher","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-25","2026-09-03",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":79},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What information should be included in the Research/Evaluation Summary section?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"Include the title of the research/evaluation, the project/program studied, grant numbers (if any), lead/contact persons, locations, and start/end dates for both the research/evaluation and the project/program.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Which aspects are evaluated under Research/Evaluation Design?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"The template prompts reviewers to assess whether questions are specific and testable, data collection methods fit the purpose, sampling is effective and consistent, indicators measure what they should, tools support calculating indicators, and ethics/participant considerations are addressed.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the template translate the review into concrete follow-up?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"It provides a Key Takeaways section to capture lessons learned and an Action Items table to list required actions, assign responsible persons, and set deadlines based on the after-action learning review.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},189680,1788398485,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":79,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":47,"language":135,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":136,"faqs":137,"seo_title":138,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":125,"read_time":73},687197207639,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","| Research/Evaluation Summary |  |\n| --- | --- |\n| Title of Research/Evaluation: |  |\n| Title of Project/Program Studied: |  |\n| Project/Program Grant Number(s): |  |\n| Contact Person/Lead for\u003Cbr>Research/Evaluation: |  |\n| Contact Person/Lead for Project/Program Studied: |  |\n| Location(s): |  |\n| Research/Evaluation Start and End Dates: |  |\n| Project/Program Start and End Dates: |  |\n\n| Research/Evaluation After-Action Review Meeting |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Meeting Date(s): |  |  |  |\n| Participant Names |  | Participant Titles |  |\n|  |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |\n| Additional Stakeholder Names |  | Additional Stakeholder Titles |  |\n|  |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |\n| 1. Overview |  |  |  |\n| Include a brief overview of the research/evaluation project, including a description of its key questions, the project/program studied, and staff/partners involved. Include a link to the full research or evaluation plan. |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |\n| 2. Research/Evaluation Design |  |  |  |\n| Prompt |  |  | Notes |\n| 2.1 | Were the planned research/evaluation questions specific, testable, and important? If yes, why? If no, why not? |  |  |\n| 2.2 | Were the planned data collection methods appropriate? If yes, why? If no, why not? |  |  |\n| 2.3 | Were the sampling strategy and processes used to identify and track participants effective and applied consistently over the course of the research/evaluation? If yes, why? If no, why not? |  |  |\n\n| 2.4 | Were the planned indicators for the research/evaluation appropriate for measuring what needed to be measured? If yes, why? If no, why not? |  |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 2.5 | Did the data collection tools (survey questionnaires, interview protocols, focus group protocols, etc.) enable collection of appropriate data to calculate the indicators? If yes, why? If no, why not? |  |\n| 2.6 | Did the design include adequate measures to maintain ethics (including obtaining meaningful informed consent from all participants, ensuring confidentiality, and protecting personally identifying information)? If yes, why? If no, why not? |  |\n| 2.7 | Did the research/evaluation design adequately address concerns related to participants’ sex? Were there equal opportunities for both men and women to participate? If yes, why? If no, why not? |  |\n| 2.8 | Did the research/evaluation design adequately address linguistic and/or contextual considerations for the participant population(s)? If yes, why? If no, why not? |  |\n| 2.9 | Was the research/evaluation adequately participatory? (i.e., Were members of the participant population(s) engaged in its design, data analysis/ interpretation, and/or results dissemination?) If yes, why? If no, why not? |  |\n| 3. Research/Evaluation Implementation |  |  |\n| Prompt |  | Notes |\n| 3.1 | Was data collected accurately? Was data collection consistent across sites or among different participant populations? Specify any data quality challenges. |  |\n| 3.2 | Was data entered correctly, consistently, and in a timely manner, including where data entry required transcription or translation? If yes, how? If no, why not? |  |\n| 3.3 | Was the entered data consistently checked and cleaned? Were data quality processes followed? If yes, how? If no, why not? |  |\n\n| 3.4 | Did analysis and interpretation enable the research/evaluation questions to be answered? If yes, how? If no, why not? |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 3.5 | Were the results disseminated with all key stakeholders? Were the results presented clearly and accessibly to facilitate their use? If yes, how? If no, why not? |  |  |\n| 3.6 | Are the results able to be used in line with the intended purpose of the\u003Cbr>research/evaluation? If yes, how? If no, why not? |  |  |\n| 4. Research/Evaluation Operations |  |  |  |\n| Prompt |  |  | Notes |\n| 4.1 | Were there sufficient financial resources assigned to the research/evaluation? If yes, how? If no, why not? |  |  |\n| 4.2 | Were there sufficient human and time resources","cbCaildncoNpcTtd","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaildncoNpcTtd","pdf",106174,"English","# Research/Evaluation Summary\n## Research/Evaluation After-Action Review Meeting\n## 1. Overview\n## 2. Research/Evaluation Design\n## 3. Research/Evaluation Implementation\n## 4. Research/Evaluation Operations\n## Key Takeaways\n## Action Items","[{\"question\":\"What information should be included in the Research/Evaluation Summary section?\",\"answer\":\"Include the title of the research/evaluation, the project/program studied, grant numbers (if any), lead/contact persons, locations, and start/end dates for both the research/evaluation and the project/program.\"},{\"question\":\"Which aspects are evaluated under Research/Evaluation Design?\",\"answer\":\"The template prompts reviewers to assess whether questions are specific and testable, data collection methods fit the purpose, sampling is effective and consistent, indicators measure what they should, tools support calculating indicators, and ethics/participant considerations are addressed.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the template translate the review into concrete follow-up?\",\"answer\":\"It provides a Key Takeaways section to capture lessons learned and an Action Items table to list required actions, assign responsible persons, and set deadlines based on the after-action learning review.\"}]","Research/Evaluation After-Action Learning Review Template - After-Action Review Meeting | PDF"]