[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-170010-105":53,"doc-detail-170010-en":118},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":111,"head_meta":113,"extra_data":115,"updated_unix":117},105,"en","requests-for-admission-washington-superior-court-snohomish-county-admit-or-deny","Requests for Admission - Washington Superior Court (Snohomish County) - Admit or Deny","","Document contains Washington State Superior Court Requests for Admission directed to the petitioner JANE D. SMITH and her counsel, requiring answers to admit or deny specified statements of fact, law application, opinions, and the genuineness of identified documents. It requires detailed reasoning for objections and specific, itemized denials or admissions, clarifying which portions are admitted versus denied and addressing lack of knowledge after reasonable inquiry. It also states the requests are continuing and require supplemental answers, followed by CR 26 certification and verification under penalty of perjury.",{"@graph":63,"@context":110},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/requests-for-admission-washington-superior-court-snohomish-county-admit-or-deny/170010/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/requests-for-admission-washington-superior-court-snohomish-county-admit-or-deny/170010.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Gloria","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-23","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":47},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What is required by the CR 26 certification and verification sections?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The signer certifies the answers, responses, and objections comply with Civil Rule 26(g) after reasonable inquiry and are warranted by law or good-faith arguments, and the petitioner verifies the answers under penalty of perjury.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":112,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":114,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":116,"site_id":56},170010,1790172655,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":119},{"doc_id":116,"user_id":120,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":121,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":122,"file_id":123,"file_url":124,"file_type":125,"file_size":126,"view_count":47,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":127,"language":128,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":129,"faqs":130,"seo_title":131,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":132,"read_time":76},2336474459895,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000baeef7a5ed0655?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786071322749376916","IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON\nIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH\nTO:\t\tPetitioner JANE D. SMITH, and her counsel, if any\nPursuant to CR 36 you are requested to admit or deny the truth of the statements of opinions, statements of fact, the application of law to fact and the genuineness of the documents set forth and/or identified in the following Requests within the time allowed by the rule (usually 30 days).\nDetailed reasons must be stated for any objection.  Answers must specifically deny the request set forth in detail, the reasons why you cannot truthfully admit or deny the request.  If part of the request is true, you must specify which part is true and which part is denied.  Lack of knowledge or information is not a reason for failure to admit or deny, absent specified and explained reasonable inquiry.\nTHESE REQUESTS ARE CONTINUING IN NATURE AND REQUIRE SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWERS UPON YOUR DISCOVERY OF FURTHER RESPONSIVE INFORMATION.\nDATED this ______ day of \u0013 DATE [\\@ \"MMMM, YYYY\"] \\* MERGEFORMAT \u0014September, 2026\u0015.\nGENESIS LAW FIRM, PLLC\nSAMUEL K. DARLING, WSBA No. 40157\nAttorneys for Respondent\nAdmit or deny that your Boeing L&I claim was denied, including on appeal, in or around July or August of 2012.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that L&I ordered and/or cleared you to return to work upon denial of your claim.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that Boeing terminated your employment in 2012 for failure to return to work.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that, after Boeing terminated your employment, you applied for federal disability benefits.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that your application for federal disability benefits was denied.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that you have no documentation from a doctor or independent medical examiner stating that your medical condition(s) currently prevent you from working fulltime.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny you told John you would make the divorce a “huge mess” unless he gave you money.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that, in your declaration to the court, you wrote that John “tried to strangle [you] on 2 separate occasions and admitted this to the police”; yet you have no police records or police statements documenting his supposed admission.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that there are no police records of any such incident.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that, after the parties’ separation, you repeatedly contacted John’s girlfriend’s son and John’s parents and made negative comments about John.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that, in a phone discussion with John’s attorney, you denied contacting John’s girlfriend’s son and John’s family members.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that, after the parties’ separation, you repeatedly contacted John’s girlfriend, including phone calls and text messages.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that, after the parties’ separation, you continued to contact John’s girlfriend even after she threatened to file harassment charges against you.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that you have called and/or texted John hundreds of times since the parties’ separation.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that you have no record of John calling or texting you once since shortly after the parties’ separation.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that, after the parties’ separation, you redirected at least nine of John’s monthly VA benefit checks from John’s account to your own bank account.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that, after the parties’ separation, you redirected one of John’s paychecks to your own bank account.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that you have no disability that currently prevents you from working fulltime.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that you have no need for spousal maintenance.\nANSWER:\nAdmit or deny that you lied about John’s supposed domestic abuse towards you.\nANSWER:\n***********************************************************************\nCR 26 CERTIFICATION\nThe undersigned certifies pursuant to Civil Rule 26(g) that he or she has read each answer, response and objection to these discovery requests, and that to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief formed after","cbCaieC7alchJ24m","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaieC7alchJ24m","docx",31711,7,"English","# Requests for Admission\n## Continuing nature and supplemental answers\n## Admit or deny statements (requests)\n## Objections and response requirements\n# CR 26 Certification\n# Verification","[{\"question\":\"What is required by the CR 26 certification and verification sections?\",\"answer\":\"The signer certifies the answers, responses, and objections comply with Civil Rule 26(g) after reasonable inquiry and are warranted by law or good-faith arguments, and the petitioner verifies the answers under penalty of perjury.\"}]","Requests for Admission - Washington Superior Court (Snohomish County) - Admit or Deny | DOCX",1788265770]