[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-239724-105":53,"doc-detail-239724-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","project-postmortem-report-postmortem-review-for-first-masters-program-cohort","PROJECT POSTMORTEM REPORT - Postmortem review for First Master’s Program Cohort","","Project postmortem report for the First Master’s Program Cohort, documenting original goals, success criteria, completion results, and lessons across planning and execution phases. The report covers enrollment outcomes (20 students) and graduation performance (70%, with 14 completing), identifies key accomplishment areas, methods that worked, and specific project elements that went wrong. It also outlines improvement actions for communication, marketing materials, scheduling change handling, and ongoing post-project responsibilities.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/project-postmortem-report-postmortem-review-for-first-masters-program-cohort/239724/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/project-postmortem-report-postmortem-review-for-first-masters-program-cohort/239724.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Stanley","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-09-11",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":15},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What were the original goals and objectives of the project?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The project aimed to recruit and maintain 20 graduate students in the new master’s level program.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What criteria defined project success, and what was the actual outcome?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Success required enrolling 100% of the target cohort and achieving at least an 80% graduation rate; the project enrolled 20 students, but graduation reached 70% with 14 completing.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What processes and communications needed improvement for future projects?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"Future improvements include clearer communication of the program’s academic and experiential methods, earlier notification of schedule changes with detailed explanations, and increasing faculty and staff meetings to reduce communication gaps.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},239724,1791588158,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":15,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":79},2336477405376,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","PROJECT POSTMORTEM REPORT EXAMPLE  \nFor editable version, please utilize PROJECT POSTMORTEM REPORT TEMPLATE.  \nPROJECT TITLE  \nFirst Master’s Program Cohort  \nMODERATOR DATE PREPARED  \n\n| Sally Smith | May 12th |\n| --- | --- |\n\n\n| What were the original goals and objectives of the project? |\n| --- |\n| To recruit and maintain 20 graduate students in the new master’s level program. |\n| What were the original criteria for project success? |\n| To enroll 100 percent of our target cohort size and have a graduation rate of at least 80 percent. |\n| Was the project completed according to the original expectation? |\n| We enrolled 20 students, but the graduation rate was 70 percent, with 14 students completing the program. |\n| Additional Comments |\n|  |\n\nPROJECT OVERVIEW  \n\n| What were the major accomplishments? |\n| --- |\n| Meeting our initial enrollment goal was a big accomplishment considering that this is a new program without an established reputation or significant word-of-mouth referrals. |\n| What methods worked well? |\n| Online marketing showed greatest returns, with 80 percent of students reporting that they found out about the program via our website and/or targeted search ads. The majority of students who enrolled also participated in introductory phone calls or in-person events. |\n| What was found to be particularly useful for accomplishing the project? |\n| Focusing resources on marketing, providing one-on-one information sessions with prospective students, soliciting feedback from students throughout the program. |\n| Additional Comments |\n|  |\n\nPROJECT HIGHLIGHTS  \nPROJECT CHALLENGES  \n\n| What elements of the project went wrong? |\n| --- |\n| Four of the students who left the program early complained of program issues related to disorganization, unclear communication, or feeling misled about expectations for the program. Two students left the program for either personal or financial reasons. |\n| What specific processes need improvement? |\n| This is a new program combining academic and experiential methods. These methods need to be communicated clearly to prospective students who may be accustomed to more traditional academic settings. Some communication gaps between faculty and staff resulted in last-minute schedule changes and other changes that impacted student experience. |\n| How can these processes be improved in the future? |\n| • Modify informational materials for prospective students to emphasize program methods and what to expect.\u003Cbr>• Increase faculty and staff meetings.\u003Cbr>• Communicate possible schedule changes to students in advance and provide detailed explanation for how changes will be handled. |\n| What were the key problems areas (i.e. , budgeting, scheduling, etc. )? |\n| • Advance preparation for possible schedule changes or other issues.\u003Cbr>• Inconsistent communication at different levels of the program. |\n| List any technical challenges. |\n|  |\n| Additional Comments |\n|  |\n\nPOST-PROJECT TASKS / FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS  \n\n| List any continuing development and maintenance objectives. |\n| --- |\n|  |\n| What actions still need to be completed, and who is responsible for completing them? |\n| • John Doe will adjust marketing materials to reflect changes mentioned above.\u003Cbr>• Alex Bee will provide training for recruiters to ensure certain talking points are covered in one-on-one sessions.\u003Cbr>• Alice Smith will manage the meeting calendar and ensure that notes are distributed to all attendees.\u003Cbr>• Bruce Jones will facilitate a program meeting to discuss organizational issues and goals for the program moving forward. |\n| List any additional outstanding project items. |\n|  |\n| Additional Comments |\n|  |\n\nPLANNING PHASE  \n\n| LESSON LEARNED | ACHIEVED? | COMMENTS |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| The project plans and scheduling were well documented, complete with adequate structure and detail. | Y |  |\n| The project schedule contained all elements of the project. | Y |  |\n| The tasks were clearly defined. | Y |  |\n| The stakeholders","cbCail4sDyKi31DD","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCail4sDyKi31DD","pdf",172029,10,"English","# Project Overview\n## Project Highlights\n## Project Challenges\n## Post-Project Tasks / Future Considerations\n## Planning Phase\n## Execution\n## Human Factors","[{\"question\":\"What were the original goals and objectives of the project?\",\"answer\":\"The project aimed to recruit and maintain 20 graduate students in the new master’s level program.\"},{\"question\":\"What criteria defined project success, and what was the actual outcome?\",\"answer\":\"Success required enrolling 100% of the target cohort and achieving at least an 80% graduation rate; the project enrolled 20 students, but graduation reached 70% with 14 completing.\"},{\"question\":\"What processes and communications needed improvement for future projects?\",\"answer\":\"Future improvements include clearer communication of the program’s academic and experiential methods, earlier notification of schedule changes with detailed explanations, and increasing faculty and staff meetings to reduce communication gaps.\"}]","PROJECT POSTMORTEM REPORT - Postmortem review for First Master’s Program Cohort | PDF",1789152416]