[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-243147-105":53,"doc-detail-243147-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","program-coordinators-meeting-march-14-2019-guidebook-20-and-self-studies-discussion","Program Coordinators’ Meeting - March 14, 2019 - Guidebook 2.0 and Self-Studies Discussion","","Agenda notes for the March 14, 2019 Program Coordinators’ Meeting, covering House Staff updates, Guidebook 2.0 descriptions, and a discussion of step-by-step usage changes. Core guidance focuses on how programs should use internal processes and data to identify issues, implement improvement plans, measure impact over time, and rationalize dropping unresolved items. The meeting also explains new Self-Study concepts, program AIM definition, SWOT framing, and a multi-year evaluation timeline aligned with ACGME self-study expectations.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/program-coordinators-meeting-march-14-2019-guidebook-20-and-self-studies-discussion/243147/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/program-coordinators-meeting-march-14-2019-guidebook-20-and-self-studies-discussion/243147.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Graffin","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",8,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What are the key expectations for programs in the meeting agenda?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"Programs are expected to use internal processes and data to find issues and seek resolution, track quality improvement over time, provide rationales for improvement plans, and address what changes next year when plans are not implemented or not successful.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"What does the document say Self-Studies are designed to do?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"Self-Studies provide an objective, comprehensive evaluation of a program and offer an opportunity to explore ways to improve. They are described as a condensed version of related evaluation and action-planning elements over many years.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How is the program AIM defined and used in Self-Study?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"Program AIM reflects leaders’ views of key expectations and the program’s differentiation from other programs, typically with a longer-term strategic perspective. It may adapt in response to program and environmental factors such as local or national workforce demands.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},243147,1791746644,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":8},3573418547284,"https://eur-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","Program Coordinators’ Meeting  \nMarch 14, 2019  \nAgenda  \n􀁠 House Staff announcement  \n􀁠 Guidebook 2.0 – Description  \n−New Changes  \n−Step by Step Usage Guide  \n􀁠 Guidebook 2.0 – Discussion  \nIf you don’t know where you’re going any road will take you there   George Harrison  \n􀁠 Programs expected to  \n− Use internal processes and data to find issues and seek resolution  \n− Track quality improvement over time  \n− Have a rationale for the improvement plan  \n− Address plans that are not implanted, not successful – what will be done differently next year?  \n− Provide rationale for dropping issues  \n􀁠 Programs that innovate are to be commended  \nSelf-Studies – What are they?  \n􀁠 Objective, comprehensive evaluation of your program  \n􀁠 Opportunity to explore means to improve your program − APE = year to year evaluation  \n− Action planning = program improvement plan and evaluation of plan − Self study is a condensed version of these elements over many years  \n􀁠 Five year “look” backward and forward  \n􀁠 Emphasis on program strengths and “self-identified” areas for improvement (SWOT)  \n−“self-identified” vs RRC identified  \n􀁠 Initiated six months before the self-study is due  \nSelf-Studies – What are they?  \n􀁠 There are two new Self-Study concepts:   \n1. exploration of program AIMS  \n2. assessment of the program’s institutional, local and, regional environment.  \n􀁠 These concepts help you:  \n1. Make the program evaluation relevant and useful  \n2. Go beyond compliance with requirements into innovation that improves your program  \n• Meet baseline requirements then  \n• Customize other improvement efforts based on your program’s environment and aim  \nWhat is a program “AIM?”  \n− Program and institutional leaders’ views of key expectations − Differentiation from other programs in the country − Usually a longer-term strategic view ,  \no Adapt aim in response to program and environmental factors − local or national workforce demands  \n−Interdisciplinary training  \n− New settings, patient populations etc.  \nMay focus on:  \n▪ Types of trainees recruited into the program  \n▪ Training for particular career paths (research, academic, clinical)  \n▪ Specific objectives (e.g., care for underserved patients, health policy or advocacy, population health) .  \nSWOT Analysis – good, hard look in the mirror  \nThis Year   \n􀁠 Identify opportunities for improvement (weaknesses from SWOT)  \n􀁠 State a plan that is an attempt to improve situation  \n􀁠 Implement Plan  \n􀁠 Measure Impact  \nNext Year  \n􀁠 Determine if plan improved situation to the point it is “resolved”  \n􀁠 If the plan “worked,” do you need to continue efforts to maintain progress?  \n􀁠 If the plan did not work, do you still care about this issue?  \n− If you drop the issue, should explain why it is no longer a focus  \n􀁠 If the plan did not work, and you still care about this what is your new plan?  \n− If staying the course discuss why you think what didn’t work last year will work this year  \n1 Year   \n􀁠 Determine if plan improved situation to the point it is “resolved”  \n􀁠 If the plan “worked,” do you need to continue efforts to maintain progress?  \n􀁠 If the plan did not work, do you still care about this issue?  \n− If you drop the issue, should explain why it is no longer a focus  \n􀁠 If the plan did not work, and you still care about this what is your new plan?  \n− If staying the course discuss why you think what didn’t work last year will work this year  \n5 Year  \n􀁠 Show number of issues resolved, continued and dropped  \n􀁠 Clear description of program improvement over time  \n􀁠 Aligns with ACGME Self Study “Look back 5 years”","cbCaiudCi7upcoUr","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiudCi7upcoUr","pdf",1619260,31,"English","# Agenda\n## Guidebook 2.0 – Description and New Changes\n## Programs expected to\n## Self-Studies – What are they?\n## Program AIM\n## SWOT Analysis and Evaluation Timeline\n## Alignment with ACGME Self Study","[{\"question\":\"What are the key expectations for programs in the meeting agenda?\",\"answer\":\"Programs are expected to use internal processes and data to find issues and seek resolution, track quality improvement over time, provide rationales for improvement plans, and address what changes next year when plans are not implemented or not successful.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the document say Self-Studies are designed to do?\",\"answer\":\"Self-Studies provide an objective, comprehensive evaluation of a program and offer an opportunity to explore ways to improve. They are described as a condensed version of related evaluation and action-planning elements over many years.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the program AIM defined and used in Self-Study?\",\"answer\":\"Program AIM reflects leaders’ views of key expectations and the program’s differentiation from other programs, typically with a longer-term strategic perspective. It may adapt in response to program and environmental factors such as local or national workforce demands.\"}]","Program Coordinators’ Meeting - March 14, 2019 - Guidebook 2.0 and Self-Studies Discussion | PDF",1789200595]