[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-170762-105":53,"doc-detail-170762-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","productivity-commission-inquiry-into-intellectual-property-arrangements-transcript-of-proceedings-melbourne-friday-24-june-2016","Productivity Commission - Inquiry Into Intellectual Property Arrangements - Transcript of Proceedings - Melbourne - Friday 24 June 2016","","Transcript of public hearings held by the Productivity Commission in Melbourne on Friday, 24 June 2016 at 8.41 am as part of an inquiry into Australia’s intellectual property arrangements. The commissioner explains the inquiry’s terms of reference, consultation steps (issues paper, roundtables, submissions), release of the draft report, and the purpose of the hearing to obtain comments, feedback, agreement or disagreement, and implementation or factual observations. Proceedings include administrative guidance on participation, truthfulness, transcript access, media ground rules, and occupational health and safety evacuation instructions.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/productivity-commission-inquiry-into-intellectual-property-arrangements-transcript-of-proceedings-melbourne-friday-24-june-2016/170762/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/productivity-commission-inquiry-into-intellectual-property-arrangements-transcript-of-proceedings-melbourne-friday-24-june-2016/170762.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Arica Lee","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-18","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":8},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What is the purpose of the Melbourne public hearing on 24 June 2016?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The hearing provides an opportunity for interested parties to comment and give feedback on the draft report, including areas of agreement, disagreement, implementation differences, and factual observations.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What steps preceded the draft report in this inquiry?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"After terms of reference in August 2015, the Commission released an issues paper in early October 2015, held consultations and roundtables, and met many interested parties to inform the inquiry before releasing the draft report in late April.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Where can the full transcript and submissions be accessed?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The transcript is made available to participants and is available on the Commission’s website following the hearings. Submissions are also available on the Commission’s website.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},170762,1788275019,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":8,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":125,"read_time":140},8796096645457,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/800003749518d68ffe3?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1779345340919836971","__________________________________________________________\nPRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION\nINQUIRY INTO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ARRANGEMENTS\nMR J COPPEL, Commissioner\nMS K CHESTER, Deputy Chair & Commissioner\nTRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS\nAT PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION, MELBOURNE\nON FRIDAY, 24 JUNE 2016 AT 8.41 AM\nINDEX\nPage\nMR MARK SUMMERFIELD\t557-571\nAUSTRALIAN BOOKSELLERS ASSOCIATION\nMR JOEL BECKER\t572-590\nMR MARK RUBBO\nMR TIM WHITE\nELECTRONIC FRONTIERS AUSTRALIA\nMR JON LAWRENCE\t591-602\nMR PETER DONOUGHUE\t602-609\nMS DEE WHITE\t609-616\nMR PETER GLEESON\t617-624\nASSOCIATION OF LIQUOR LICENCES MELBOURNE\nMR CON SARROU\t624-632\nPENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE AUSTRALIA\nMS JULIE BURLAND\t633-646\nMS BRIONY LEWIS\nLAW COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA\nMR RICHARD HAMER\t647-659\nQUALCOMM INCORPORATED\nMR ALEX ORANGE\t659-672\nMR PHIL WADSWORTH\nIPTA\nMR MICHAEL CAINE\t673-686\nTEXT PUBLISHING COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA\nMR MICHAEL HEYWARD\t687-697\nMR MARCUS FAZIO\nMS WENDY ORR\t698-704\nSCRIBE PUBLICATIONS\nMR HENRY ROSENBLOOM\t705-712\nHAPPY FINISH DESIGN\nMR NICK RENNIE\t712-719\nMR NICK GRUEN\t719-727\nMR DAVID DAY\t727-730\nRESUMED\t[8.41 am]\nMR COPPEL:  Good morning everybody.  Welcome to the public hearings of the Productivity Commission Inquiry in Australia's Intellectual Property Arrangements.  My name is Jonathan Coppel and I am one of the Commissioners on the inquiry and my colleague Karen Chester is the other Commissioner.\nBy way of background, the inquiry started with a terms of reference from the Australian Government in August 2015 to examine Australia's IP arrangements including their effect on investment, competition, trade, innovation and consumer welfare.  We then released an Issues Paper in early October 2015 and we've talked to a range of organisations and individuals with an interest in the issues.  We have also held a number of roundtables, both pre-report, draft report and post-draft report and met with many groups of interested parties to inform the inquiry.\nWe released the draft report in late April, which included over 20 draft recommendations, draft findings and a number of information requests.  We have received a large number of submissions in response and now they total well over 500.  So we are grateful to all the organisations and individuals who have taken the time to prepare submissions, many of those who are appearing at the hearings both today and in previous days.\nThe purpose of the hearing is to provide an opportunity for interested parties to provide comments and feedback on the draft report; things like where people agree with the draft recommendations and where they may disagree or where there may be differences of opinion on ease of implementation or even factual comments.\nPrior to this hearing today, hearings have been held in Brisbane, Canberra and Sydney and also yesterday in Melbourne.  A further hearing will be held in Sydney next Monday.  We will then be working towards completing the final report, having considered all the evidence presented at the hearings and submissions, as well as other informal discussions.  The final report will be handed to the Australian Government later this year.  All those participants and those who have registered their interest in this inquiry will be advised of the final reports released by government which may be up to 25 parliamentary sitting days after completion.\nRegarding today's proceedings, we like to conduct all hearings in a reasonably informal manner, but I remind participants that a full transcript is being taken.  For this reason, comments from the floor cannot be taken but at the end of today's proceedings we will endeavour, time permitting, to provide an opportunity for anyone who wishes to do so to make a brief presentation\nParticipants are not required to take an oath, but are required under the Productivity Commission Act to be truthful in their remarks.  The transcript will be made available to participants and will be available on the Commission's web site following the hearings.  Submissions are also available ","cbCaih9XDYXQ8E3V","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaih9XDYXQ8E3V","docx",244725,178,"English","# Transcript of Proceedings\n## Inquiry background and hearing purpose\n## Participants, submissions, and transcript availability\n## Proceedings logistics and safety instructions\n## Opening remarks and first participant","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the Melbourne public hearing on 24 June 2016?\",\"answer\":\"The hearing provides an opportunity for interested parties to comment and give feedback on the draft report, including areas of agreement, disagreement, implementation differences, and factual observations.\"},{\"question\":\"What steps preceded the draft report in this inquiry?\",\"answer\":\"After terms of reference in August 2015, the Commission released an issues paper in early October 2015, held consultations and roundtables, and met many interested parties to inform the inquiry before releasing the draft report in late April.\"},{\"question\":\"Where can the full transcript and submissions be accessed?\",\"answer\":\"The transcript is made available to participants and is available on the Commission’s website following the hearings. Submissions are also available on the Commission’s website.\"}]","Productivity Commission - Inquiry Into Intellectual Property Arrangements - Transcript of Proceedings - Melbourne - Friday 24 June 2016 | DOCX",62]