[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-197142-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":80,"doc-detail-197142-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","proceedings-on-engineering-sciences-vol-2-no-1-2020","Proceedings on Engineering Sciences - Vol. 2, No. 1 - 2020","","Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020) presents statistical comparisons of tour-related evaluation dimensions across multiple destinations, including Seoul, Singapore, Tokyo, and Beijing. Results report distributions of responses for pre-tour information quality, tour registration, immigration procedure, airport/tour company staff, transportation, touristic sites, touristic activities, itinerary, tour guide, supplementary services, and intentions to return and recommend. Correlation analyses (r and p) and pairwise destination tests (z and p) quantify how each factor relates to return and recommendation intentions and how perceptions differ between city pairs.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/","Presentations",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/proceedings-on-engineering-sciences-vol-2-no-1-2020/197142/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/proceedings-on-engineering-sciences-vol-2-no-1-2020/197142.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Emma Mercer","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-11","2026-09-03",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":30},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What tour evaluation dimensions are analyzed in the document?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The document analyzes pre-tour information quality, tour registration, immigration procedure, airport/tour company staff, transportation to/from the airport, touristic sites, touristic activities, itinerary, tour guide, and supplementary services.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How are the relationships between tour factors and intentions measured?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"It uses correlation analysis with r and p values to examine associations between each evaluation factor and the intentions to return and to recommend.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"What method is used for comparing results between destinations?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"The document reports pairwise destination comparisons using z statistics and p values, such as Seoul vs. Singapore, Seoul vs. Tokyo, Singapore vs. Beijing, and other city pairs.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},197142,1791130473,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,92,97,102,107,112,117,122],{"id":84,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},11,90,"presentations",{"id":88,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":93,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":98,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":103,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":104,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":108,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":113,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":118,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":119,"show_sort_weight":120,"slug":121},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":123,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":125},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":127},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":128,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":22,"category_id":84,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":135,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":141,"read_time":30},962084925502,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","| | Vol. 02, No. 1 (2020) 41-48, doi: 10.24874/PES02.01.005\u003Cbr>Proceedings on Engineering Sciences\u003Cbr>[www.pesjournal.net](www.pesjournal.net) | |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n|  |  |  |\n\n|  | Not mentioned | Mentioned | Positive | Negative |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Pre-tour information quality | 307 (87.5%) | 44 (12.5%) | 31 (8.8%) | 13 (3.7%) |\n| Tour registration | 274 (78.1%) | 77 (21.9%) | 65 (18.5%) | 12 (3.4%) |\n| Immigration procedure | 311 (88.6%) | 40 (11.4%) | 20 (5.7%) | 20 (5.7%) |\n| Airport/tour company staff | 321 (91.4%) | 30 (8.6%) | 23 (6.6%) | 7 (2.0%) |\n| Transportation to/from airport | 274 (78.1%) | 77 (22.0%) | 74 (21.1%) | 3 (0.9%) |\n| Touristic sites | 188 (53.6%) | 163 (46.4%) | 157 (44.7%) | 6 (1.7%) |\n| Touristic activities | 269 (76.6%) | 82 (23.4%) | 80 (22.8%) | 2 (0.6%) |\n| Itinerary | 256 (73.0%) | 95 (27.0%) | 78 (22.2%) | 17 (4.8%) |\n| Tour guide | 119 (33.9%) | 232 (66.1%) | 223 (63.5%) | 9 (2.6%) |\n| Supplementary | 294 (83.7%) | 57 (16.3%) | 56 (16.0%) | 1 (0.3%) |\n| Intention to return | 283 (80.7%) | 68 (19.4%) | 64 (18.2%) | 4 (1.1%) |\n| Intention to recommend | 203 (57.9%) | 148 (42.1%) | 144 (41.0%) | 4 (1.1%) |\n\n\n|  | Intention to return | Intention to recommend |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Pre-tour information quality | r = 0.099; p = 0.065 | r = 0.133; p = 0.013 |\n| Tour registration | r = 0.030; p = 0.570 | r = 0.158; p = 0.003 |\n| Immigration procedure | r = 0.063; p = 0.237 | r = 0.050; p = 0.346 |\n| Airport/tour company staff | r = 0.099; p = 0.064 | r = -0.011; p = 0.833 |\n| Transportation to/from airport | r = 0.079; p = 0.141 | r = 0.069; p = 0.194 |\n| Touristic sites | r = 0.090; p = 0.094 | r = 0.020; p = 0.710 |\n| Touristic activities | r = 0.057; p = 0.283 | r = 0.088; p = 0.101 |\n| Itinerary | r = 0.037; p = 0.489 | r = 0.101; p = 0.059 |\n| Tour guide | r = 0.119; p = 0.026 | r = 0.152; p = 0.004 |\n| Supplementary | r = -0.010; p = 0.847 | r = 0.134; p = 0.012 |\n\n\n|  | Seoul (n = 89) |  |  | Singapore (n = 133) |  |  | Tokyo (n = 41) |  |  | Beijing (n = 88) |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | Negative | N/M | Positive | Negative | N/M | Positive | Negative | N/M | Positive | Negative | N/M | Positive |\n| Pre-tour information quality | 6 | 82 | 1 | 7 | 122 | 4 | 0 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 63 | 25 |\n| Tour registration | 8 | 73 | 8 | 4 | 116 | 13 | 0 | 32 | 9 | 0 | 53 | 35 |\n| Immigration procedure | 7 | 78 | 4 | 7 | 119 | 7 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 6 | 73 | 9 |\n| Airport/tour company staff | 3 | 72 | 14 | 4 | 121 | 8 | 0 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 88 | 0 |\n| Transportation to/from airport | 2 | 73 | 14 | 1 | 115 | 17 | 0 | 30 | 11 | 0 | 56 | 32 |\n| Touristic sites | 2 | 67 | 20 | 3 | 85 | 45 | 0 | 3 | 38 | 1 | 33 | 54 |\n| Touristic activities | 2 | 68 | 19 | 0 | 126 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 27 | 0 | 61 | 27 |\n| Itinerary | 4 | 70 | 15 | 12 | 106 | 15 | 1 | 27 | 13 | 0 | 53 | 35 |\n| Tour guide | 2 | 41 | 46 | 7 | 54 | 72 | 0 | 6 | 35 | 0 | 18 | 70 |\n| Supplementary | 0 | 72 | 17 | 1 | 121 | 11 | 0 | 37 | 4 | 0 | 64 | 24 |\n| Intention to return | 1 | 73 | 15 | 3 | 104 | 26 | 0 | 30 | 11 | 0 | 76 | 12 |\n| Intention to recommend | 2 | 58 | 29 | 2 | 88 | 43 | 0 | 20 | 21 | 0 | 37 | 51 |\n\n\n|  | Seoul vs.\u003Cbr>Singapore |  | Seoul vs.\u003Cbr>Tokyo |  | Seoul vs.\u003Cbr>Beijing |  | Singapore vs.\u003Cbr>Beijing |  | Singapore vs.\u003Cbr>Tokyo |  | Tokyo vs.\u003Cbr>Beijing |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | z | p | z | p | z | p | z | p | z | p | z | p |\n| Pre-tour information quality | -0.858 | 0.391 | -1.733 | 0.083 | -5.518 | 0.000 | -5.721 | 0.000 | -1.005 | 0.315 | -3.410 | 0.001 |\n| Tour registration | -1.258 | 0.209 | -2.662 | 0.008 | -5.261 | 0.000 | -5.431 | 0.000 | -2.270 | 0.023 | -1.980 | 0.048 |\n| Immigration procedure | -0.735 | 0.463 | -0.639 | 0.523 | -1.173 | 0.000 | -0.693 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | -0.559 | 0.576 |\n| Airport/tour company staff | -1.960 | 0.050 | -1.526 | 0.127 | -2.780 | 0.000 | -0.963 | 0.000 | -0.13","cbCaihOHdyyIe3Si","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihOHdyyIe3Si","pdf",511467,7,8,"English","# Proceedings on Engineering Sciences\n## Tour evaluation dimensions\n## Correlation between factors and intentions\n## Cross-destination comparisons","[{\"question\":\"What tour evaluation dimensions are analyzed in the document?\",\"answer\":\"The document analyzes pre-tour information quality, tour registration, immigration procedure, airport/tour company staff, transportation to/from the airport, touristic sites, touristic activities, itinerary, tour guide, and supplementary services.\"},{\"question\":\"How are the relationships between tour factors and intentions measured?\",\"answer\":\"It uses correlation analysis with r and p values to examine associations between each evaluation factor and the intentions to return and to recommend.\"},{\"question\":\"What method is used for comparing results between destinations?\",\"answer\":\"The document reports pairwise destination comparisons using z statistics and p values, such as Seoul vs. Singapore, Seoul vs. Tokyo, Singapore vs. Beijing, and other city pairs.\"}]","Proceedings on Engineering Sciences - Vol. 2, No. 1 - 2020 | PDF",1788465320]