[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-245178-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":81,"doc-detail-245178-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","post-tenure-report-data-checklist","Post-Tenure Report Data Checklist","","Post-Tenure Review Report Data Checklist列出提交Quatrics调查前需要准备的关键数据与材料清单，涵盖上一年度被复审的终身教职人员总数、终评中各项评分与教学/科研/服务等活动的统计、以及院长层级审计涉及的档案数量、问题识别与采取的措施。还包括由院长召集审计小组及其遴选依据、退回部门同行评审的档案数量、以及被抽取接受审计的APR文件中全部教职人员的姓名、职级与最近审阅时间等。",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/","Forms",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/post-tenure-report-data-checklist/245178/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/post-tenure-report-data-checklist/245178.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"\tJames","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-24","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What data must be prepared before submitting to the Quatrics survey?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Prepare counts of reviewed tenured faculty, teaching/research/creative/service ratings and outcomes, Dean’s Level Audit file totals, identified problems and actions, audit panel composition and selection rationale, and lists of faculty whose APR files were selected for post-tenure audit.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What should be included for the Dean’s Level Audit section?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Include the number of audited files, any problems identified during the audit, and the actions taken in response.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What additional plans may be required and what counts are needed for them?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"For 2024 reviews, determine how many faculty entered a Faculty Development Plan (including approved and pending counts) and how many entered a Performance Improvement Plan (including approved and pending counts), alongside related unsatisfactory and departure outcomes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},245178,1790753634,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,89,94,99,104,109,113,118,123],{"id":85,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":86,"show_sort_weight":87,"slug":88},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":90,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":91,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":95,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":100,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":105,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":110,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":112},17,40,"forms",{"id":114,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":115,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":119,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":124,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":126},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":128},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":129,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":22,"category_id":110,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":22,"language":136,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":140,"read_time":4},2336474466412,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","P o s t - T e n u r e R e v i e w R e p o r t D a t at o C o l l e c t a n d P r e p a r e  \nP l e a s e h a v e t h e f o l l o w i n g i n f o r m a t i o n r e a d yb e f o r e s u b m i t t i n g i n t o t h e  Q u a l t r i c s S u r v e y .  \n The total number of tenured faculty reviewed in the previous year.  \nThe total number of tenured faculty who received a rating for teaching, scholarship,  \n  research. creative activities, service, and other activities in their final evaluation   The number of files that were audited as part of the Dean’s Level Audit.   \n  Any problems identified as part of the Dean’s Level Audit and actions taken.  \nThe composition of the panel convened by the dean and how was the audit committee  chosen. (Include member name, rank, and if the member was appointed, the reason why. )  \nNumber of files sent from the Post-Tenure Review Committees back to the  departmental peer committees for re‐examination  \nList the name, rank, department, and when they were last reviewed for ALL faculty   whose APR files were selected for the post-tenure audit last year. Excel Template  \nCreate a document that provides all the \"brief write ups of progress\" that were   provided to the immediate administrative heads for each tenured faculty member.  \nDid you have any Post-Tenure Reviews that required faculty to enter a Faculty   Development Plan? If yes, determine the number of the following:   \n Total number of faculty rated \"unsatisfactory: in one or more areas, but not rated \"unsatisfactory\"in their overall performance in 2024.  \n Number of faculty who had their work assignment adjusted.  \n Number of faculty who appealed their rating and it was changed.  \n Number of faculty who left the university.  \n Number of faculty who entered a Faculty Development Plan.  \no Of these, the number of plans that have been approved?  \no Of these, the number of plans pending?  \nDid you have any 2024 Post-Tenure Reviews that required faculty to enter a   Performance Improvement Plan? If yes, determine the number of the following:  \n Number of faculty rated \"unsatisfactory\" in their overall performance in 2024.  \n Of these, the number of faculty who chose to leave the university.  \n Number of faculty with unsatisfactory completion of Faculty Development Plan in 2024.  \n Of these, the number of faculty who chose to leave the university.  \n Number of faculty who entered a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) .  \n Of these, the number of plans that have been approved.  \n Of these, the number of plans pending.  \nRevised 9/24/25","cbCaioClPI2bEBGA","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaioClPI2bEBGA","pdf",129883,"English","# Required Tenured Faculty Review Statistics\n## Prior-Year Tenured Faculty Totals and Ratings\n## Dean’s Level Audit Files, Findings, and Actions\n# Audit Committee Composition and Peer Re-Examination\n## Panel Members and Selection Rationale\n## Files Returned to Department Peer Committees\n# APR File Lists and Progress Summaries\n## Faculty APR Selection Details\n## Brief Progress Write-Ups for Administrative Heads\n# Faculty Development Plan (FDP) Requirements\n## Unsatisfactory Ratings and Related Outcomes\n## Work Assignment Adjustments and Rating Appeals\n## FDP Entered, Approved, and Pending\n# Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) Requirements\n## Overall Unsatisfactory and Related Outcomes\n## PIP Entered, Approved, and Pending","[{\"question\":\"What data must be prepared before submitting to the Quatrics survey?\",\"answer\":\"Prepare counts of reviewed tenured faculty, teaching/research/creative/service ratings and outcomes, Dean’s Level Audit file totals, identified problems and actions, audit panel composition and selection rationale, and lists of faculty whose APR files were selected for post-tenure audit.\"},{\"question\":\"What should be included for the Dean’s Level Audit section?\",\"answer\":\"Include the number of audited files, any problems identified during the audit, and the actions taken in response.\"},{\"question\":\"What additional plans may be required and what counts are needed for them?\",\"answer\":\"For 2024 reviews, determine how many faculty entered a Faculty Development Plan (including approved and pending counts) and how many entered a Performance Improvement Plan (including approved and pending counts), alongside related unsatisfactory and departure outcomes.\"}]","Post-Tenure Report Data Checklist | PDF",1789225672]