[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-242175-105":53,"doc-detail-242175-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","pcmh-consultant-rfp-2016-017-questions-and-answers","PCMH Consultant RFP 2016-017 - Questions and Answers","","Questions and Answers document for a Nassau Health Care Corporation request for proposals (RFP) for a Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) consultant. It addresses bidder concerns about exhibits, proposal submission deadlines, and how selection criteria are applied and weighted. The Q&A also clarifies required appendix forms, acceptable ways to provide audited financial statements, distinctions between qualifications and experience, reference lists, budgeting expectations, billing-cost proposal formatting, and expectations for provider contracting and collaboration leadership composition.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/pcmh-consultant-rfp-2016-017-questions-and-answers/242175/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/pcmh-consultant-rfp-2016-017-questions-and-answers/242175.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"McQueen","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-07","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What does the RFP require regarding “hands-on” consult support?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"The response indicates that there are no exhibits referenced in the RFP, including the exhibit that would normally specify the provider base.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Can the proposal submission deadline be extended, and what are the options after extension?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"The deadline was extended to 5:00 pm July 29, 2016. If a proposal was already submitted, the bidder may resubmit, revoke, or keep the original proposal.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How are selection criteria evaluated and weighted?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"The NHCC/NUMC DSRIP Hub will use the original RFP evaluation criteria, and the criteria are weighted equally.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},242175,1790485713,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":79,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":73},5909890329169,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","NASSAU HEALTH CARE CORPORATION a/k/a the NuHealth System Request for Proposals for  \nPATIENT CENTERED MEDICAL HOME (PCMH) CONSULTANT RFP 2016-017  \nQuestions and Answers  \n1. Page 4 of the RFP indicates,“Provide direct “hands-on” consult support to NUMC, Hub partners and contracted providers to a specific provider base as indicated in Exhibit 1”.  \nAnswer: We have no exhibits to the RFP.  \n2. Would NHCC consider an extension to the due date of the proposal, considering that much of our proposal content will be predicated on the information in Exhibit 1 of the RFP and the responses to these questions, as well as the need to send the proposal in hard copy?  \nAnswer: NHCC has extended the deadline for submission to 5:00 pm July 29, 2016. If you have already submitted a proposal you may choose to re-submit, revoke or keep your original proposal as submitted.  \n3. Page 15, VI. Selection Criteria – How will the proposals be evaluated against each other?  \nAnswer: The NHCC/NUMC DSRIP Hub will use the following evaluation criteria as noted in the original RFP:  \n􀁸 Overall proposal suitability: proposed solution(s) must meet the scope and needs included herein and be presented in a clear and organized manner.  \n􀁸 Organizational Experience: Bidders will be evaluated on their experience as it pertains to the scope of this project.  \n􀁸 Previous work: Bidders will be evaluated on experience based on client testimonials and references.  \n􀁸 Value and cost: Bidders will be evaluated on the cost of their solution(s) based on the work to be performed in accordance with the scope of this project.  \n􀁸 Ability to begin the engagement once the winning bidder is announced.  \n4. Can NHCC provide any evaluation points or weights associated with the individual elements listed in RFP section “VI. Selection Criteria”?  \nAnswer: Criteria will be weighted equally.  \n5. Page 12, II. Contents of Proposals, J. Information Required in Appendix I to this RFP – Can NHCC confirm that the forms referenced as “Appendix I” include and are limited to the following?  \n Statement of non-collusion (page 25)  \n Disclosure of Contacts Form (page 26)  \n Disclosure of Prior Non-Responsibility Determinations Form (page 27)  \n MWBE Utilization Plan (pages 28-29)  \nAnswer: Please refer to RFP  \n6. Page 10, 6.a and 6.b-The RFP requires that bidders attach their most recent annual audited financial statement, as well as financial statements for the past two years, and quarterly statements since the most recent financial statement. As a publicly traded company, each of our annual reports is more than 100 pages. In an effort to keep our environmental footprint to a minimum, would NHCC accept a link to the forms (available 24/7 on our website) in the 5 paper copies, and the electronic versions of the forms on the CD copy?  \nAnswer: Links are not sufficient however it is permissible to send a CD with each paper copy.  \n7. Section II. Contents of Proposals, Section C.5 and D.– Both Section C.5 and D request that bidders provide qualifications / experience. Please clarify the difference in the information that bidders should provide in their response to Section C.5 and D.  \nAnswer: NHCC views qualifications as your organization’s capacity to manage the project contained within this RFP. We view experience as relevant work performed under similar circumstances.  \n8. Please clarify the difference between the three references requested in Section C.7 and the references requested in Section D. Section II. Contents of Proposals, Section C.7 and D.– Both Section C.7 and D request that bidders identify client individuals (and provide contact information) who may be contacted (i.e., references) .  \nAnswer: Bidders may use the same list of references for sections C.7 and D.  \n9. Please indicate the budget that has been allocated or approved for this project.  \nAnswer: NHCC has not set a budget minimum or maximum for this project and will evaluate proposals based on the criteria stated in the R","cbCaiePy6GPrDNI1","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiePy6GPrDNI1","pdf",148316,"English","# Questions and Answers","[{\"question\":\"What does the RFP require regarding “hands-on” consult support?\",\"answer\":\"The response indicates that there are no exhibits referenced in the RFP, including the exhibit that would normally specify the provider base.\"},{\"question\":\"Can the proposal submission deadline be extended, and what are the options after extension?\",\"answer\":\"The deadline was extended to 5:00 pm July 29, 2016. If a proposal was already submitted, the bidder may resubmit, revoke, or keep the original proposal.\"},{\"question\":\"How are selection criteria evaluated and weighted?\",\"answer\":\"The NHCC/NUMC DSRIP Hub will use the original RFP evaluation criteria, and the criteria are weighted equally.\"}]","PCMH Consultant RFP 2016-017 - Questions and Answers | PDF",1789187425]