[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-219775-105":53,"doc-detail-219775-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","organizing-practices-of-university-industry-and-government-that-facilitate-or-impede-the-transition-to-a-hybrid-triple-helix-model-of-innovation","Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate or impede the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation","","Drawing on the contemporary turn to discursive practices, the study examines how organizing practices among industry, university, and government facilitate or impede developing countries’ transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Using an emphasis on everyday situated practices of institutional agents, their interactions, and collaborative relationships, three practice domains are identified: advanced research capabilities and external partnerships, quantification of scientific knowledge and outputs, and collective entrepreneurship. The work also highlights contextual effects of differing interpretive schemata on innovation organization across the actors.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":46,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/paper-templates/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/organizing-practices-of-university-industry-and-government-that-facilitate-or-impede-the-transition-to-a-hybrid-triple-helix-model-of-innovation/219775/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/organizing-practices-of-university-industry-and-government-that-facilitate-or-impede-the-transition-to-a-hybrid-triple-helix-model-of-innovation/219775.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Theodore","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-16","2026-09-08",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",8,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What main topic does the document address?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"How organizing practices of industry, universities, and government facilitate or impede developing countries’ transition to a hybrid triple helix innovation model.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Which three domains of organizing practices are identified?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"Advanced research capabilities and external partnerships; quantification of scientific knowledge and outputs; and collective entrepreneurship.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Why does the document argue the transition question matters theoretically and empirically?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"It emphasizes bottom-up, agent- and practice-centered causation, explaining why countries can be successful or unsuccessful and how taken-for-granted practices enable or constrain knowledge-based action.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},219775,1790522393,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":45,"category_name":46,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":142},7971461740886,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","David Sarpong1, Email: \u0013 HYPERLINK \"mailto:David2.Sarpong@uwe.ac.uk\" \u0014David2.Sarpong@uwe.ac.uk\u0015\nAzley AbdRazak2, Email: \u0013 HYPERLINK \"mailto:Azley.AbdRazak@uwe.ac.uk\" \u0014Azley.AbdRazak@uwe.ac.uk\u0015\nElizabeth Alexander3, Email: \u0013 HYPERLINK \"mailto:Elizabeth2.Alexander@uwe.ac.uk\" \u0014Elizabeth2.Alexander@uwe.ac.uk\u0015\nDirk Meissner4, Email: \u0013 HYPERLINK \"mailto:dmeissner@hse.ru\" \u0014dmeissner@hse.ru\u0015\nAuthors Affiliation123:\nBristol Business School\nUniversity of the West of England\nBristol, BS16 1QY\nUnited Kingdom\nAuthors Affliation4 :\nResearch Lab for Science and Technology Studies\nInstitute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge\nNational Research University - Higher School of Economics\nMyasnitskaya st., 20\nOrganizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation\nAbstract\nDrawing on the contemporary turn to discursive practices we examine how the organizing practices of industry, university and government facilitate (or impede) developing countries transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Placing emphasis on the everyday situated practices of institutional agents, their interactions, and collaborative relationships, we identified three domains of practices (advanced research capabilities and external partnerships, the quantification of scientific knowledge and outputs, and collective entrepreneurship) that constitutively facilitate (or impede) partnership and in turn the successful transition to a hybrid triple helix model. Our study also highlights the contextual influence of differential schemata of interpretations on how to organize innovation by the three institutional actors in developing countries.\nKeywords: Discursive practices, innovation, Malaysia, organizing practices, triple helix\nIntroduction\nIn parallel with the emergence of the knowledge based economy, research into national systems of innovation has flourished over the past 50 years (e.g. [1-5]). Indeed, national and regional innovation scholars have dedicated considerable effort and attention to understanding how and when linkages between governments, economic actors, universities, and other institutions may lead to the identification of opportunities for innovation that deliver value to all stakeholders (e.g. [6-9]). As institutional collaboration becomes increasingly wide-spread, the capacities for such partnerships to stimulate innovation and generate inclusive economies has attracted a lot of research interests [8,10]. At the centre of these developments is the evolutionary triple helix model which advocates strategic interactions and collaboration between universities, industry and government [10-12].\nRecurrent themes in recent theory have therefore focussed on the evolution of the triple helix model of innovation in developing countries, particularly those in East Asia, regarded as having developed institutional infrastructure and appropriate technologies to support innovation and production hubs [13-15]. This interest has also been extended to the exploration of the potential of triple helix in contribution to technology commercialization, new venture creation, and its consequences for policy initiatives in transition economies [16-19]. As this research suggest, triple helix plays a crucial role in integrating relevant institutions to boost national innovative activities and technology development [20]. Promising flexible and desirable outcomes from close interactions and optimal collaborations’ between universities, industry, and government, triple helix enable nations to anticipate how they could create wealth and build knowledge based society. Yet, as research indicates, there are no ready-made recipes to guide countries in transitioning to the triple helix model. In this regard, some researchers have criticized the triple helix model for paying scant attention to social context [21], and lacking ‘socio-cognitive’ micro-foundations to drive its empiri","cbCaib7wIDJaRRJc","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaib7wIDJaRRJc","docx",136930,29,"English","# Abstract\n# Keywords\n# Introduction\n## Knowledge-based economy and national systems of innovation\n## The triple helix model and developing-country focus\n## Critiques and micro-foundations\n## Research question and organizing practices concept\n## Approach and triadic influence framework","[{\"question\":\"What main topic does the document address?\",\"answer\":\"How organizing practices of industry, universities, and government facilitate or impede developing countries’ transition to a hybrid triple helix innovation model.\"},{\"question\":\"Which three domains of organizing practices are identified?\",\"answer\":\"Advanced research capabilities and external partnerships; quantification of scientific knowledge and outputs; and collective entrepreneurship.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the document argue the transition question matters theoretically and empirically?\",\"answer\":\"It emphasizes bottom-up, agent- and practice-centered causation, explaining why countries can be successful or unsuccessful and how taken-for-granted practices enable or constrain knowledge-based action.\"}]","Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate or impede the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation | DOCX",1788893951,10]